Suppr超能文献

新西兰成年人多样化样本中生活方式行为与最佳健康状况之间的关联。

Associations between lifestyle behaviours and optimal wellbeing in a diverse sample of New Zealand adults.

作者信息

Prendergast Kate B, Schofield Grant M, Mackay Lisa M

机构信息

Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 22;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2755-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In positive psychology optimal wellbeing is considered a broad, multi-dimensional construct encompassing both feelings and functioning. Yet, this notion of wellbeing has not been translated into public health. The purpose of this study is to integrate public health and positive psychology to determine associations between lifestyle behaviours and optimal wellbeing in a diverse sample of New Zealand adults.

METHODS

A web-based survey design was employed to collect data. Participants reported on their wellbeing and lifestyle behaviours including nutrition, exercise, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Optimal wellbeing was calculated using a multi-dimensional scale designed to mirror the internationally recognised diagnostic criteria for mental disorders. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate associations between 10 lifestyle behaviours and optimal wellbeing.

RESULTS

Of the total sample (n = 9514), 24 % met the criteria for optimal wellbeing. Compared to reference groups, the association with optimal wellbeing was greater for those who reported exercising ≥ 7 times/week (odds ratio: 1.61, 95 % confidence interval: 1.22-2.13, p < 0.01) and sitting "almost none of the time" (1.87, 1.01-3.29, p < 0.01). Optimal wellbeing was lower for those reporting restless sleep "almost all of the time" (0.24, 95 % CI: 0.17-0.32 p < 0.01) and consuming sugary drinks 5-6 times/week (0.73, 95 % CI: 0.53-0.95, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Public health and positive psychology were integrated to provide support for a relationship between lifestyle behaviours and a multi-dimensional measure of optimal wellbeing. It is likely this relationship between lifestyle behaviours and optimal wellbeing is bidirectional giving rise to the debate that holistic approaches are needed to promote positive health.

摘要

背景

在积极心理学中,最佳幸福感被视为一个广泛的、多维度的概念,涵盖了情感和功能。然而,这种幸福感的概念尚未转化为公共卫生领域的应用。本研究的目的是将公共卫生与积极心理学相结合,以确定新西兰成年人多样化样本中生活方式行为与最佳幸福感之间的关联。

方法

采用基于网络的调查设计来收集数据。参与者报告了他们的幸福感和生活方式行为,包括营养、运动、久坐行为和睡眠。使用一个多维度量表来计算最佳幸福感,该量表旨在反映国际认可的精神障碍诊断标准。二元逻辑回归用于计算10种生活方式行为与最佳幸福感之间的关联。

结果

在总样本(n = 9514)中,24%符合最佳幸福感的标准。与参照组相比,每周锻炼≥7次的人(优势比:1.61,95%置信区间:1.22 - 2.13,p < 0.01)和“几乎从不”久坐的人(1.87,1.01 - 3.29,p < 0.01)与最佳幸福感的关联更大。“几乎总是”睡眠不安稳的人(0.24,95% CI:0.17 - 0.32,p < 0.01)和每周饮用含糖饮料5 - 6次的人(0.73,95% CI:0.53 - 0.95,p < 0.05)的最佳幸福感较低。

结论

公共卫生与积极心理学相结合,为生活方式行为与多维度最佳幸福感测量之间的关系提供了支持。生活方式行为与最佳幸福感之间的这种关系可能是双向的,引发了关于需要采用整体方法来促进积极健康的争论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a485/4722793/61a00d5f204d/12889_2016_2755_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验