• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在欧洲蓬勃发展:一种用于定义幸福的新概念框架的应用

Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being.

作者信息

Huppert Felicia A, So Timothy T C

机构信息

Well-Being Institute & Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Box 189, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ UK.

出版信息

Soc Indic Res. 2013 Feb;110(3):837-861. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
PMID:23329863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3545194/
Abstract

Governments around the world are recognising the importance of measuring subjective well-being as an indicator of progress. But how should well-being be measured? A conceptual framework is offered which equates high well-being with positive mental health. Well-being is seen as lying at the opposite end of a spectrum to the common mental disorders (depression, anxiety). By examining internationally agreed criteria for depression and anxiety (DSM and ICD classifications), and defining the opposite of each symptom, we identify ten features of positive well-being. These combine feeling and functioning, i.e. hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being: competence, emotional stability, engagement, meaning, optimism, positive emotion, positive relationships, resilience, self esteem, and vitality. An operational definition of flourishing is developed, based on psychometric analysis of indicators of these ten features, using data from a representative sample of 43,000 Europeans. Application of this definition to respondents from the 23 countries which participated in the European Social Survey (Round 3) reveals a four-fold difference in flourishing rate, from 41% in Denmark to less than 10% in Slovakia, Russia and Portugal. There are also striking differences in country profiles across the 10 features. These profiles offer fresh insight into cultural differences in well-being, and indicate which features may provide the most promising targets for policies to improve well-being. Comparison with a life satisfaction measure shows that valuable information would be lost if well-being was measured by life satisfaction. Taken together, our findings reinforce the need to measure subjective well-being as a multi-dimensional construct in future surveys.

摘要

世界各国政府都认识到衡量主观幸福感作为进步指标的重要性。但幸福感应如何衡量呢?本文提供了一个概念框架,将高幸福感等同于积极的心理健康。幸福感被视为与常见精神障碍(抑郁症、焦虑症)处于连续谱的相反一端。通过研究国际公认的抑郁症和焦虑症标准(DSM和ICD分类),并定义每种症状的相反面,我们确定了积极幸福感的十个特征。这些特征结合了感受和功能,即幸福感的享乐主义和自我实现方面:能力、情绪稳定性、投入度、意义、乐观主义、积极情绪、积极人际关系、恢复力、自尊和活力。基于对这十个特征指标的心理测量分析,利用来自43000名欧洲人的代表性样本数据,制定了繁荣的操作性定义。将这个定义应用于参与欧洲社会调查(第三轮)的23个国家的受访者,结果显示繁荣率存在四倍的差异,从丹麦的41%到斯洛伐克、俄罗斯和葡萄牙的不到10%。在这十个特征方面,各国的情况也存在显著差异。这些情况为幸福感的文化差异提供了新的见解,并指出哪些特征可能为改善幸福感的政策提供最有希望的目标。与生活满意度测量的比较表明,如果用生活满意度来衡量幸福感,将会丢失有价值的信息。综上所述,我们的研究结果强化了在未来调查中需要将主观幸福感作为一个多维结构来衡量的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be0/3545194/24e55927eb7d/11205_2011_9966_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be0/3545194/f60c84bba401/11205_2011_9966_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be0/3545194/24e55927eb7d/11205_2011_9966_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be0/3545194/f60c84bba401/11205_2011_9966_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be0/3545194/24e55927eb7d/11205_2011_9966_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being.在欧洲蓬勃发展:一种用于定义幸福的新概念框架的应用
Soc Indic Res. 2013 Feb;110(3):837-861. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
2
The longitudinal relationship between flourishing mental health and incident mood, anxiety and substance use disorders.心理健康蓬勃发展与情绪、焦虑及物质使用障碍发病之间的纵向关系。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Jun 1;27(3):563-568. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw202.
3
Measurement of flourishing: a scoping review.蓬勃发展的衡量:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 1;15:1293943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293943. eCollection 2024.
4
Flourishing: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.蓬勃发展:一项进化概念分析。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Nov;38(11):915-923. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1355945. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
5
Validation of the Flourishing Scale in a sample of people with suboptimal levels of mental well-being.验证在心理幸福感水平欠佳的人群样本中使用幸福度量表的有效性。
BMC Psychol. 2016 Mar 17;4:12. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0116-5.
6
[Acute schizophrenia concept and definition: investigation of a French psychiatrist population].[急性精神分裂症的概念与定义:对法国精神科医生群体的调查]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82367-x.
7
A two-dimensional conceptual framework for understanding mental well-being.理解心理健康的二维概念框架。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0214045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214045. eCollection 2019.
8
Profiles and Transitions of Dual-Factor Mental Health among Chinese Early Adolescents: The Predictive Roles of Perceived Psychological Need Satisfaction and Stress in School.中国青少年双因素心理健康的特征和转变:学校中感知心理需求满足和压力的预测作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Oct;49(10):2090-2108. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01253-7. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Social Exclusion and Subjective Well-being Among Older Adults in Europe: Findings From the European Social Survey.社会排斥与欧洲老年人的主观幸福感:来自欧洲社会调查的发现。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):425-434. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa172.
10
Measuring subjective well-being for policy purposes: The example of well-being indicators in the WHO "Health 2020" framework.为政策目的衡量主观幸福感:以世界卫生组织“健康2020”框架中的幸福感指标为例。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Mar;46(2):279-286. doi: 10.1177/1403494817724952. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Does "Lying Flat" Lead to Greater Life Satisfaction? Evidence from Empirical Research.“躺平”会带来更高的生活满意度吗?实证研究证据。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;15(8):1067. doi: 10.3390/bs15081067.
2
The impact of an artificial intelligence enhancement program on healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and workplace flourishing.人工智能强化计划对医疗保健提供者的知识、态度和工作场所繁荣的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 7;13:1639333. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1639333. eCollection 2025.
3
Physiological attunement and flourishing: understanding the influence of relationships on health.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being.超越金钱:走向幸福经济。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Jul;5(1):1-31. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x. Epub 2004 Jul 1.
2
Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981-2007).发展、自由与幸福感提升:全球视野(1981-2007)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;3(4):264-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x.
3
A New Approach to Reducing Disorder and Improving Well-Being.一种减少混乱和提升幸福感的新方法。
生理协调与蓬勃发展:理解人际关系对健康的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 1;16:1614379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1614379. eCollection 2025.
4
Individual vitality changes over 20 years among aging adults, using predefined and data-driven patterns: the Doetinchem Cohort Study.采用预定义和数据驱动模式研究20年间老年成年人的个体活力变化:多廷赫姆队列研究
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Aug 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00878-6.
5
A Digital Tool for Assessing Well-Being at the Workplace and in Personal Life: Development and Validation of the Quan Well-Being Index.一种用于评估工作场所和个人生活幸福感的数字工具:全人幸福感指数的开发与验证
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 8;9:e73713. doi: 10.2196/73713.
6
Coping with long-COVID stigma: The role of self-compassion and self-coldness.应对长期新冠后遗症的污名化:自我同情与自我冷漠的作用。
Health Psychol Open. 2025 Jul 26;12:20551029251349409. doi: 10.1177/20551029251349409. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
A systematic review on the impact of social support on college students' wellbeing and mental health.关于社会支持对大学生幸福感和心理健康影响的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0325212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325212. eCollection 2025.
8
Daily Stressor-Related Negative Mood and its Associations with Flourishing and Daily Curiosity.与日常应激源相关的负面情绪及其与蓬勃发展和日常好奇心的关联。
J Happiness Stud. 2022 Feb;23(2):423-438. doi: 10.1007/s10902-021-00404-2. Epub 2021 May 8.
9
The Relationship Between Personal Wellbeing, Choice and NDIS Individualised Planning and Support for People With Intellectual Disabilities.个人幸福感、选择与智力残疾人士的国家残疾保险计划个性化规划及支持之间的关系
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jul;38(4):e70085. doi: 10.1111/jar.70085.
10
Local Landscapes, Evolving Minds: Mechanisms of Neighbourhood Influence on Dual-State Mental Health Trajectories in Adolescence.当地环境与心智发展:邻里环境对青少年双相心理健康轨迹的影响机制
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 17;22(6):951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060951.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;4(1):108-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01100.x.
4
How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?主观幸福感的衡量标准如何用于为公共政策提供信息?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):71-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x.
5
Income, health, and well-being around the world: evidence from the Gallup World Poll.世界各地的收入、健康与幸福:盖洛普世界民意调查的证据
J Econ Perspect. 2008 Spring;22(2):53-72. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.2.53.
6
Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey.沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)的内部结构效度:一项使用苏格兰健康教育人口调查数据的拉施分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Feb 19;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-15.
7
Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies.积极的心理健康与死亡率:前瞻性观察性研究的定量综述
Psychosom Med. 2008 Sep;70(7):741-56. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818105ba. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
8
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation.沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS):编制与英国适用性验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
9
Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a complementary strategy for improving national mental health.促进和保护心理健康以实现蓬勃发展:改善国家心理健康的补充策略。
Am Psychol. 2007 Feb-Mar;62(2):95-108. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95.
10
The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life.心理健康连续体:从生活中的萎靡状态到蓬勃状态。
J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Jun;43(2):207-22.