• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯预测投影在变量选择中的价值:以选择年轻成年人幸福感的生活方式预测因素为例。

The value of Bayesian predictive projection for variable selection: an example of selecting lifestyle predictors of young adult well-being.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10690-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-10690-3
PMID:33836714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8033696/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Variable selection is an important issue in many fields such as public health and psychology. Researchers often gather data on many variables of interest and then are faced with two challenging goals: building an accurate model with few predictors, and making probabilistic statements (inference) about this model. Unfortunately, it is currently difficult to attain these goals with the two most popular methods for variable selection methods: stepwise selection and LASSO. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the use predictive projection feature selection - a novel Bayesian variable selection method that delivers both predictive power and inference. We apply predictive projection to a sample of New Zealand young adults, use it to build a compact model for predicting well-being, and compare it to other variable selection methods.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 791 young adults (ages 18 to 25, 71.7% female) living in Dunedin, New Zealand who had taken part in the Daily Life Study in 2013-2014. Participants completed a 13-day online daily diary assessment of their well-being and a range of lifestyle variables (e.g., sleep, physical activity, diet variables). The participants' diary data was averaged across days and analyzed cross-sectionally to identify predictors of average flourishing. Predictive projection was used to select as few predictors as necessary to approximate the predictive accuracy of a reference model with all 28 predictors. Predictive projection was also compared to other variable selection methods, including stepwise selection and LASSO.

RESULTS

Three predictors were sufficient to approximate the predictions of the reference model: higher sleep quality, less trouble concentrating, and more servings of fruit. The performance of the projected submodel generalized well. Compared to other variable selection methods, predictive projection produced models with either matching or slightly worse performance; however, this performance was achieved with much fewer predictors.

CONCLUSION

Predictive projection was used to efficiently arrive at a compact model with good predictive accuracy. The predictors selected into the submodel - felt refreshed after waking up, had less trouble concentrating, and ate more servings of fruit - were all theoretically meaningful. Our findings showcase the utility of predictive projection in a practical variable selection problem.

摘要

背景

变量选择是公共卫生和心理学等许多领域的重要问题。研究人员通常会收集许多感兴趣的变量的数据,然后面临两个具有挑战性的目标:用少数预测因子建立一个准确的模型,以及对这个模型进行概率推断(推断)。不幸的是,目前使用两种最流行的变量选择方法(逐步选择和 LASSO)很难实现这些目标。本研究的目的是展示预测投影特征选择的使用 - 一种新颖的贝叶斯变量选择方法,它提供了预测能力和推断。我们将预测投影应用于新西兰年轻成年人的样本中,用它来建立一个预测幸福感的紧凑模型,并将其与其他变量选择方法进行比较。

方法

该样本包括 791 名年龄在 18 至 25 岁之间的年轻成年人(71.7%为女性),他们参加了 2013-2014 年在达尼丁进行的日常生活研究。参与者完成了为期 13 天的在线日常日记评估他们的幸福感和一系列生活方式变量(例如,睡眠、体育活动、饮食变量)。参与者的日记数据按天平均,进行横断面分析,以确定平均繁荣的预测因子。预测投影用于选择尽可能少的预测因子,以近似具有所有 28 个预测因子的参考模型的预测精度。预测投影也与其他变量选择方法进行了比较,包括逐步选择和 LASSO。

结果

需要三个预测因子才能近似参考模型的预测:更高的睡眠质量、更少的注意力不集中和更多的水果份量。预测子模型的性能很好地概括了。与其他变量选择方法相比,预测投影产生的模型具有匹配或略差的性能;然而,这是通过使用更少的预测因子来实现的。

结论

预测投影被用于有效地获得具有良好预测精度的紧凑模型。选择进入子模型的预测因子 - 醒来后感到神清气爽、注意力不集中较少、吃更多份水果 - 都具有理论意义。我们的研究结果展示了预测投影在实际变量选择问题中的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192c/8033696/ffdacfb7030b/12889_2021_10690_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192c/8033696/2e7ec7e7bd2c/12889_2021_10690_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192c/8033696/0de600e3f8a2/12889_2021_10690_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192c/8033696/ffdacfb7030b/12889_2021_10690_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192c/8033696/2e7ec7e7bd2c/12889_2021_10690_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192c/8033696/0de600e3f8a2/12889_2021_10690_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192c/8033696/ffdacfb7030b/12889_2021_10690_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The value of Bayesian predictive projection for variable selection: an example of selecting lifestyle predictors of young adult well-being.贝叶斯预测投影在变量选择中的价值:以选择年轻成年人幸福感的生活方式预测因素为例。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10690-3.
2
On carrots and curiosity: eating fruit and vegetables is associated with greater flourishing in daily life.论胡萝卜与好奇心:食用果蔬与日常生活中的更蓬勃发展相关。
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 May;20(2):413-27. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12113. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
3
Predictors of Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: New Insight Using Receiver Operating Curve Indices and Bayesian Network Analysis.创伤性脑损伤预后的预测因素:使用受试者工作特征曲线指标和贝叶斯网络分析的新见解
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 7;11(7):e0158762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158762. eCollection 2016.
4
Associations between Health Behaviors and Factors on Markers of Healthy Psychological and Physiological Functioning: a Daily Diary Study.健康行为与健康心理和生理功能标志物相关因素的关联:一项日常日记研究。
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Jan 1;54(1):22-35. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz018.
5
Let them eat fruit! The effect of fruit and vegetable consumption on psychological well-being in young adults: A randomized controlled trial.让他们吃水果!水果和蔬菜消费对年轻人心理健康的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0171206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171206. eCollection 2017.
6
The development and effectiveness of an ecological momentary intervention to increase daily fruit and vegetable consumption in low-consuming young adults.一项旨在增加低果蔬摄入量的年轻成年人每日果蔬消费量的生态瞬时干预措施的开发与效果
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
9
Lifestyle Behavior Changes and Associated Risk Factors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the Canadian COVIDiet Online Cohort Study.生活方式行为改变与 COVID-19 大流行期间的相关风险因素:来自加拿大 COVIDiet 在线队列研究的结果。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 30;9:e43786. doi: 10.2196/43786.
10
Bayesian Techniques in Predicting Frailty among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the Netherlands.荷兰社区居住老年人衰弱预测中的贝叶斯技术
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Feb;105:104836. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104836. Epub 2022 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Feature Ranking on Small Samples: A Bayes-Based Approach.小样本特征排序:一种基于贝叶斯的方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Jul 22;27(8):773. doi: 10.3390/e27080773.
2
From surviving to thriving: How sleep, physical activity, and diet shape well-being in young adults.从生存到蓬勃发展:睡眠、体育活动和饮食如何塑造年轻人的幸福感。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 27;20(8):e0329689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329689. eCollection 2025.
3
Identification of Risk Factors for Relapse in Childhood Leukemia Using Penalized Semi-parametric Mixture Cure Competing Risks Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
The Big Three Health Behaviors and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of Sleep, Exercise, and Diet.年轻人的三大健康行为与心理健康及幸福感:睡眠、运动和饮食的横断面调查
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 10;11:579205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579205. eCollection 2020.
3
The generalizability crisis.普遍性危机。
利用惩罚半参数混合治愈竞争风险模型识别儿童白血病复发的危险因素。
J Res Health Sci. 2024 Jun 1;24(2):e00615. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2024.150.
4
Development and Evaluation of a Digital HIV Risk Assessment Tool Incorporated Within an App-Based Self-Testing Program.开发并评估一款整合于基于 APP 的自检项目中的数字化 HIV 风险评估工具。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2023 Aug 15;93(5):387-394. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003210.
5
Identification of Spatial Proteomic Signatures of Colon Tumor Metastasis: A Digital Spatial Profiling Approach.鉴定结肠肿瘤转移的空间蛋白质组学特征:一种数字空间分析方法。
Am J Pathol. 2023 Jun;193(6):778-795. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
6
Mixed Effects Machine Learning Models for Colon Cancer Metastasis Prediction using Spatially Localized Immuno-Oncology Markers.基于空间本地化免疫肿瘤标志物的结肠癌转移预测的混合效应机器学习模型。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2022;27:175-186.
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 21;45:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20001685.
4
Mediterranean diet and wellbeing: evidence from a nationwide survey.地中海饮食与健康:基于全国性调查的证据。
Psychol Health. 2019 Mar;34(3):321-335. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1525492. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Cross-Validation Approaches for Replicability in Psychology.心理学中可重复性的交叉验证方法。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 2;9:1117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01117. eCollection 2018.
6
Intake of Raw Fruits and Vegetables Is Associated With Better Mental Health Than Intake of Processed Fruits and Vegetables.与摄入加工过的水果和蔬菜相比,摄入生的水果和蔬菜与更好的心理健康状况相关。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 10;9:487. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00487. eCollection 2018.
7
Happiest People Revisited.再探最幸福的人
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):176-184. doi: 10.1177/1745691617697077.
8
An Electronic Ecological Momentary Assessment Study to Examine the Consumption of High-Fat/High-Sugar Foods, Fruits/Vegetables, and Affective States Among Women.电子生态瞬时评估研究考察女性食用高脂肪/高糖食物、水果/蔬菜和情绪状态的情况。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Jun;50(6):626-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
9
Variable selection - A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician.变量选择——给执业统计学家的一篇综述与建议
Biom J. 2018 May;60(3):431-449. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700067. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
10
Initial elevation bias in subjective reports.主观报告中的初始提升偏差。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 2;115(1):E15-E23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712277115. Epub 2017 Dec 18.