Costa T N, Abdalla R Z, Santo M A, Tavares R R F M, Abdalla B M Z, Cecconello I
Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, GAstroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo, Medical School, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):257-65. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1457-y. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
The introduction of the minimally invasive approach changed the way abdominal surgery was carried out. Open suture and mesh reinforcement in ventral hernia repair used to be the surgeon's choice of procedure. Although the laparoscopic approach, with defect bridging and mesh fixation, has been described since 1993, the procedure remains largely unchanged. Evidence shows that defect closure and retro-muscular mesh positioning have the best outcomes and are the best surgical practice. We therefore aimed to develop and demonstrate a procedure which combined the good results of open surgery using the Rives-Stoppa principles, particularly in terms of recurrence, with all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.
Between October 2012 and February 2014, 15 post-bariatric surgery patients underwent laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair. The peritoneal cavity was accessed through a 5-mm optical view cannula at the superior left quadrant. A suprapubic and two right and left lower quadrant cannulas were inserted for inferior access and dissection. The defect adhesions were released. The whole midline was closed with an endoscopic linear stapler, including the defect, from the lower abdomen, 4 cm below the umbilicus, until the epigastric region, including posterior sheath mechanical suturing and cutting in the same movement. A retrorectus space was created in which a retro-muscular mesh was deployed. Fixation was done using a hernia stapler against the posterior sheath from the peritoneal cavity to the abdominal wall muscles. Selection was based on xifo-umbilical incisional midline hernias post open bariatric surgery. Pregnant women, cancer patients, or patients with clinical contraindications were excluded.
The patients mean age was 51.2 years (range 39-67). Four patients were men and eleven women. Two had well-compensated fibromyalgia, four had diabetes, and five had hypertension. The mean BMI was 29.5 kg/m2 (range 23-31.6). Surgery was performed successfully in all cases through four ports; the number of incisional hernias was 3 ± 2, with a mean maximum width of 3.75 cm (range 2.1-9) and maximum length of 14 cm (7.5-20.5). The mean surgical time was 114.3 min (range 85-170), and the median hospital stay was 1.4 days. No intra-operative or immediate post-operative complication or death occurred. One patient had a seroma treated conservatively 1 week after surgery and another had a retro-muscular infection treated with percutaneous drainage. CT-Scans made before and after the procedure, showed total closure of the defect. QOL questionnaire showed satisfaction, acceptance, and no complaints.
Although the study involved a small number of patients, it has proved the technique to be feasible, easy to perform, and have the combined benefits of laparoscopic and open surgery. The results, shown by CT-scan, peri-operative, and QOL findings, were good.
微创方法的引入改变了腹部手术的实施方式。过去,开放缝合和网状物加固是腹疝修补术中外科医生的首选手术方式。尽管自1993年以来就已描述了采用缺损桥接和网状物固定的腹腔镜手术方式,但该手术方式在很大程度上仍未改变。有证据表明,缺损闭合和肌后网状物定位具有最佳效果,是最佳的外科手术操作。因此,我们旨在开发并展示一种手术方法,该方法结合了采用里夫斯 - 斯托帕原则的开放手术的良好效果,尤其是在复发方面,同时具备微创手术的所有优点。
在2012年10月至2014年2月期间,15例减肥手术后的患者接受了腹腔镜中线切口疝修补术。通过左上象限的一个5毫米光学观察套管进入腹腔。插入一个耻骨上套管以及左右下象限的两个套管用于低位进入和解剖。松解缺损粘连。使用内镜直线缝合器从脐下4厘米处的下腹部直至上腹部区域闭合整个中线,包括缺损,同时进行后鞘的机械缝合和切割。创建一个腹直肌后间隙,在其中放置一个肌后网状物。使用疝吻合器从腹腔向腹壁肌肉固定在腹后鞘上。入选标准为减肥手术后的脐周切口中线疝患者。排除孕妇、癌症患者或有临床禁忌证的患者。
患者的平均年龄为51.2岁(范围39 - 67岁)。4例为男性,11例为女性。2例患有病情得到良好控制的纤维肌痛,4例患有糖尿病,5例患有高血压。平均体重指数为29.5 kg/m²(范围23 - 31.6)。所有病例均通过四个端口成功完成手术;切口疝的数量为3 ± 2个,平均最大宽度为3.75厘米(范围2.1 - 9厘米),最大长度为14厘米(7.5 - 20.5厘米)。平均手术时间为114.3分钟(范围85 - 170分钟),中位住院时间为1.4天。未发生术中或术后即刻并发症或死亡。1例患者术后1周出现血清肿,经保守治疗;另1例患者出现肌后感染,经经皮引流治疗。手术前后的CT扫描显示缺损完全闭合。生活质量问卷显示患者满意、接受且无抱怨。
尽管该研究涉及的患者数量较少,但已证明该技术可行、易于实施,并具有腹腔镜手术和开放手术的综合优点。CT扫描、围手术期及生活质量检查结果均显示效果良好。