• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹中线微创重建手术:技术与结果

Transabdominal midline reconstruction by minimally invasive surgery: technique and results.

作者信息

Costa T N, Abdalla R Z, Santo M A, Tavares R R F M, Abdalla B M Z, Cecconello I

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, GAstroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo, Medical School, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):257-65. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1457-y. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-016-1457-y
PMID:26801185
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of the minimally invasive approach changed the way abdominal surgery was carried out. Open suture and mesh reinforcement in ventral hernia repair used to be the surgeon's choice of procedure. Although the laparoscopic approach, with defect bridging and mesh fixation, has been described since 1993, the procedure remains largely unchanged. Evidence shows that defect closure and retro-muscular mesh positioning have the best outcomes and are the best surgical practice. We therefore aimed to develop and demonstrate a procedure which combined the good results of open surgery using the Rives-Stoppa principles, particularly in terms of recurrence, with all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

METHODS

Between October 2012 and February 2014, 15 post-bariatric surgery patients underwent laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair. The peritoneal cavity was accessed through a 5-mm optical view cannula at the superior left quadrant. A suprapubic and two right and left lower quadrant cannulas were inserted for inferior access and dissection. The defect adhesions were released. The whole midline was closed with an endoscopic linear stapler, including the defect, from the lower abdomen, 4 cm below the umbilicus, until the epigastric region, including posterior sheath mechanical suturing and cutting in the same movement. A retrorectus space was created in which a retro-muscular mesh was deployed. Fixation was done using a hernia stapler against the posterior sheath from the peritoneal cavity to the abdominal wall muscles. Selection was based on xifo-umbilical incisional midline hernias post open bariatric surgery. Pregnant women, cancer patients, or patients with clinical contraindications were excluded.

RESULTS

The patients mean age was 51.2 years (range 39-67). Four patients were men and eleven women. Two had well-compensated fibromyalgia, four had diabetes, and five had hypertension. The mean BMI was 29.5 kg/m2 (range 23-31.6). Surgery was performed successfully in all cases through four ports; the number of incisional hernias was 3 ± 2, with a mean maximum width of 3.75 cm (range 2.1-9) and maximum length of 14 cm (7.5-20.5). The mean surgical time was 114.3 min (range 85-170), and the median hospital stay was 1.4 days. No intra-operative or immediate post-operative complication or death occurred. One patient had a seroma treated conservatively 1 week after surgery and another had a retro-muscular infection treated with percutaneous drainage. CT-Scans made before and after the procedure, showed total closure of the defect. QOL questionnaire showed satisfaction, acceptance, and no complaints.

CONCLUSION

Although the study involved a small number of patients, it has proved the technique to be feasible, easy to perform, and have the combined benefits of laparoscopic and open surgery. The results, shown by CT-scan, peri-operative, and QOL findings, were good.

摘要

背景

微创方法的引入改变了腹部手术的实施方式。过去,开放缝合和网状物加固是腹疝修补术中外科医生的首选手术方式。尽管自1993年以来就已描述了采用缺损桥接和网状物固定的腹腔镜手术方式,但该手术方式在很大程度上仍未改变。有证据表明,缺损闭合和肌后网状物定位具有最佳效果,是最佳的外科手术操作。因此,我们旨在开发并展示一种手术方法,该方法结合了采用里夫斯 - 斯托帕原则的开放手术的良好效果,尤其是在复发方面,同时具备微创手术的所有优点。

方法

在2012年10月至2014年2月期间,15例减肥手术后的患者接受了腹腔镜中线切口疝修补术。通过左上象限的一个5毫米光学观察套管进入腹腔。插入一个耻骨上套管以及左右下象限的两个套管用于低位进入和解剖。松解缺损粘连。使用内镜直线缝合器从脐下4厘米处的下腹部直至上腹部区域闭合整个中线,包括缺损,同时进行后鞘的机械缝合和切割。创建一个腹直肌后间隙,在其中放置一个肌后网状物。使用疝吻合器从腹腔向腹壁肌肉固定在腹后鞘上。入选标准为减肥手术后的脐周切口中线疝患者。排除孕妇、癌症患者或有临床禁忌证的患者。

结果

患者的平均年龄为51.2岁(范围39 - 67岁)。4例为男性,11例为女性。2例患有病情得到良好控制的纤维肌痛,4例患有糖尿病,5例患有高血压。平均体重指数为29.5 kg/m²(范围23 - 31.6)。所有病例均通过四个端口成功完成手术;切口疝的数量为3 ± 2个,平均最大宽度为3.75厘米(范围2.1 - 9厘米),最大长度为14厘米(7.5 - 20.5厘米)。平均手术时间为114.3分钟(范围85 - 170分钟),中位住院时间为1.4天。未发生术中或术后即刻并发症或死亡。1例患者术后1周出现血清肿,经保守治疗;另1例患者出现肌后感染,经经皮引流治疗。手术前后的CT扫描显示缺损完全闭合。生活质量问卷显示患者满意、接受且无抱怨。

结论

尽管该研究涉及的患者数量较少,但已证明该技术可行、易于实施,并具有腹腔镜手术和开放手术的综合优点。CT扫描、围手术期及生活质量检查结果均显示效果良好。

相似文献

1
Transabdominal midline reconstruction by minimally invasive surgery: technique and results.经腹中线微创重建手术:技术与结果
Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):257-65. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1457-y. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
2
Extended Totally Extraperitoneal (eTEP) Approach for Ventral Hernia Repair: Initial Results.经扩展的完全腹膜外(eTEP)入路在腹外疝修补术中的初步应用效果。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 May;98(5):260-266. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA technique): a step forward in minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction for ventral hernia repair (LVHR).腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘重建术(LIRA 技术):微创腹壁重建治疗腹疝修补术(LVHR)的新进展。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3502-3508. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6070-y. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
4
Robotic-assisted repair of incisional hernia-early experiences of a university robotic hernia program and comparison with open and minimally invasive sublay technique (eMILOS).机器人辅助切口疝修补术-大学机器人疝项目的早期经验及与开放和微创经腹腔入路腹膜前修补术(eMILOS)的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 12;408(1):396. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03129-3.
5
e-TEP repair for midline primary and incisional hernia: technical considerations and initial experience.电子经皮内固定技术(e-TEP)修复中线原发性和切口疝:技术考虑和初步经验。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1635-1646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02397-6. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Endoscopic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retromuscular approach for ventral hernia repair.内镜增强视野完全腹膜外肌后入路治疗腹外疝。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3749-3756. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06669-2. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Minimal Invasive Linea Alba Reconstruction for the Treatment of Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias with Coexisting Rectus Abdominis Diastasis.白线微创重建术治疗合并腹直肌分离的脐疝和上腹部疝
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1223-1228. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0018. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
8
Peritoneal flap technique for abdominal wall expansion in the management of complex ventral hernias: a multicentre study from India.经腹膜瓣技术进行腹壁扩张在复杂腹壁疝治疗中的应用:来自印度的多中心研究。
Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):863-869. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02993-2. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
9
Initial UK experience with transversus abdominis muscle release for posterior components separation in abdominal wall reconstruction of large or complex ventral hernias: a combined approach by general and plastic surgeons.英国首次应用腹横肌松解术进行大型或复杂腹侧疝腹壁重建中后入路成分分离:普通外科医生与整形外科医生联合开展的方法
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Apr;99(4):265-270. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0241. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
10
Unidirectional barbed sutures as a novel technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.单向倒刺缝线作为腹腔镜腹疝修补的新技术。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):764-769. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4275-x. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Approach Utilizing Linear Stapler for Midline Incisional Hernia: Stapler Repair Technique.利用线性吻合器治疗中线切口疝的微创方法:吻合器修复技术
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Apr 21;9(5):1086-1092. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70026. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Switching from robotic-assisted extended transabdominal preperitoneal (eTAPP) to totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia repair for umbilical and epigastric hernias.从机器人辅助经腹前外侧(eTAPP)到完全腹膜外(eTEP)疝修补术治疗脐疝和上腹部疝。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52165-6.
3
Stapled fascial suture: ex vivo modeling and clinical implications.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of mid-line abdominal wall hernias with the use of endo-stapler for mid-line closure.使用腔内吻合器进行中线闭合治疗腹壁中线疝。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(4):335-7. doi: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000400016.
2
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-part 1.腹腔镜治疗腹壁下和切口疝的指南(国际腹内疝学会 (IEHS)-第 1 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):2-29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
3
Incisional hernia: laparoscopic or open repair?
吻合筋膜缝线:离体模型与临床意义
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8797-8806. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09304-9. Epub 2022 May 16.
4
Effect of Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Umbilical Hernia Repair on Incision Infection, Complication Rate, and Recurrence Rate in Patients with Umbilical Hernia.腹腔镜全腹膜外脐疝修补术对脐疝患者切口感染、并发症发生率和复发率的影响。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 11;2022:7055045. doi: 10.1155/2022/7055045. eCollection 2022.
5
A Detailed History of Retromuscular Repairs for Ventral Hernias: A Story of Surgical Innovation.经腹横纹肌入路修补术治疗腹外疝的详细历史:一场外科创新的故事。
World J Surg. 2022 Feb;46(2):409-415. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06362-3. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
6
Comparison of outcomes in rectus abdominis diastasis repair-which data do we need in a hernia registry?腹直肌分离修复术结局的比较——疝登记处需要哪些数据?
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):891-903. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02466-w. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach (TEA) technique for primary ventral hernia repair.经内镜完全腹膜外途径(TEA)技术治疗原发性腹疝修补术。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3734-3741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07575-8. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Acronyms Use in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Introduction to a New Language.缩写词在腹壁重建中的应用:一种新语言的引入。
World J Surg. 2020 Jan;44(1):78-83. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05221-6.
9
MILOS and EMILOS repair of primary umbilical and epigastric hernias.MILOS 和 EMILOS 修复脐疝和腹上疝。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):935-944. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02056-x. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
10
Classification of Rectus Diastasis-A Proposal by the German Hernia Society (DHG) and the International Endohernia Society (IEHS).腹直肌分离的分类——德国疝学会(DHG)和国际内镜疝学会(IEHS)的提议
Front Surg. 2019 Jan 28;6:1. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00001. eCollection 2019.
切口疝:腹腔镜修补还是开放修补?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Aug;23(4):419-22. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3c33.
4
Does ventral hernia defect length, width, or area predict postoperative quality of life? Answers from a prospective, international study.腹疝缺损的长度、宽度或面积是否能预测术后生活质量?一项前瞻性国际研究的答案。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.034. Epub 2013 May 9.
5
Interposition of the hernia sac as a protective layer in repair of giant incisional hernia with polypropylene mesh.将疝囊作为保护层在聚丙烯补片修补巨大切口疝中应用。
Surg Today. 2014 Feb;44(2):227-32. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0595-4. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
6
Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the first Italian Consensus Conference.腹腔镜下腹部切口疝修补术:第一届意大利共识会议的循证指南。
Hernia. 2013 Oct;17(5):557-66. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1055-1. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Long-term durability and comfort of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术的长期耐用性和舒适性
JSLS. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):380-6.
8
Combined laparoscopic and open technique for the repair of large complicated incisional hernias.腹腔镜联合开放技术治疗大型复杂切口疝。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1778-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2680-y. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
9
Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: A meta-analysis of observational studies.分析腹腔镜疝修补术与开放修补术相比的益处:一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。
J Minim Access Surg. 2012 Oct;8(4):111-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.103107.
10
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of ventral hernia: a step towards physiological repair.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗腹疝:迈向生理性修复的一步。
Indian J Surg. 2011 Dec;73(6):403-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0366-7. Epub 2011 Nov 9.