Suppr超能文献

内镜增强视野完全腹膜外肌后入路治疗腹外疝。

Endoscopic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retromuscular approach for ventral hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of Endoscopic Surgery, Military Medical Academy - Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3749-3756. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06669-2. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary or incisional ventral hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures, addressed to general surgeons. The enhanced view-totally extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) was first described by Deas for inguinal hernias, but lately it has been applied to ventral hernias by Belyansky et al. So far, results are promising and data about the procedure are rising.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative analysis of 27 recruited eTEP procedures and 27 IPOM operations for the period between April 2017 and June 2018 at the department of Endoscopic surgery of Military Medical Academy, Sofia. Baseline characteristics, operative records and perioperative data are provided and compared for both groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included. There were no differences between age, sex, BMI, primary or incisional hernias, co-morbidity, active smoking, EHS-classification and immunosuppression through the patients in different groups. Mean defect area-eTEP is 71 cm with no statistical difference, compared to IPOM-76 cm. Operative time in eTEP is significantly longer with mean time of 186 min and 90 min in IPOM patients. Mean length of stay did not differ between the groups, with 2.9 days after eTEP and 3.4 after IPOM. Median pain score from the intraoperative (the day of surgery) to the seventh postoperative day is lower in the eTEP group. No surgical site infections and/or mesh infections were present. There was one readmission in the IPOM group with ASBO, and it was managed conservatively. There were no reinterventions and perioperative mortality in the sample.

CONCLUSION

We found out that the eTEP/eRS approach is feasible and safe. Our study shows comparable results of eTEP/eRS to the IPOM procedure with reduced video analogue scale pain score to the 7th postoperative day and increased operative time. The study contributes to the upcoming evidence in the field of new minimally invasive techniques for ventral hernia repair.

摘要

背景

原发性或切口腹疝修补术是最常见的外科手术之一,由普通外科医生进行。增强型全腹膜外技术(eTEP)最初由 Deas 用于腹股沟疝,但最近 Belyansky 等人已将其应用于腹疝。到目前为止,结果很有希望,关于该手术的资料也在不断增加。

方法

对 2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 6 月在索非亚军事医学院内镜外科系进行的 27 例 eTEP 手术和 27 例 IPOM 手术进行回顾性对比分析。为两组患者提供并比较了基线特征、手术记录和围手术期数据。

结果

共纳入 54 例患者。两组患者在年龄、性别、BMI、原发性或切口疝、合并症、主动吸烟、EHS 分级和免疫抑制方面无差异。eTEP 的平均缺损面积为 71cm,与 IPOM 的 76cm 无统计学差异。eTEP 的手术时间明显较长,平均时间为 186min,而 IPOM 患者的平均时间为 90min。两组患者的住院时间无差异,eTEP 后为 2.9 天,IPOM 后为 3.4 天。从术中(手术当天)到第 7 天的中位疼痛评分在 eTEP 组较低。没有发生手术部位感染和/或网片感染。IPOM 组有 1 例再入院,ASBO 并经保守治疗。样本中无再次干预和围手术期死亡。

结论

我们发现 eTEP/eRS 方法是可行且安全的。我们的研究表明,eTEP/eRS 与 IPOM 手术的结果相当,术后第 7 天的视觉模拟评分疼痛减轻,手术时间延长。该研究为新的微创技术在腹疝修补领域的发展提供了证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验