• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用线性吻合器治疗中线切口疝的微创方法:吻合器修复技术

Minimally Invasive Approach Utilizing Linear Stapler for Midline Incisional Hernia: Stapler Repair Technique.

作者信息

Ueda Sho, Saito Takuya, Yasui Kohei, Shinohara Kentaro, Fukami Yasuyuki, Kaneko Kenitiro, Sano Tsuyoshi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Aichi Medical University Aichi Japan.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Apr 21;9(5):1086-1092. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70026. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/ags3.70026
PMID:40922918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12414582/
Abstract

AIM

We successfully established the stapler repair technique (SRT), a straightforward laparoscopic Rives-Stoppa approach utilizing a linear stapler. This study retrospectively evaluated its short-term outcomes to determine its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

The surgical outcomes of 87 patients who underwent laparoscopic median incisional hernia repair at our hospital were reviewed between August 2017 and May 2024. Patients were treated with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM), laparoscopic trans-abdominal retromuscular (TARM), or SRT.

RESULTS

Among these patients, 37 were treated with IPOM, 16 with TARM, and 34 with SRT, with no significant differences in patient characteristics. The median surgical time (range) was 96 min (50-211) for IPOM, 256 min (196-300) for TARM, and 112 min (60-289) for SRT, respectively. The median mesh areas (ranges) were 210 cm (80-500) for IPOM, 500 cm (270-780) for TARM, and 379 cm (176-864) for SRT, respectively. The SRT group had significantly shorter operative times ( < 0.001) and smaller mesh areas ( = 0.005) than the TARM group. Compared to the IPOM group, there was no significant difference in operative time in the SRT group ( = 0.444), but the mesh area was significantly larger ( < 0.001). The SRT group had no significant intraoperative complications or conversions to open surgery.

CONCLUSION

SRT offers a comparable operative time to IPOM and a significantly shorter time than TARM. Additionally, SRT can be performed extraperitoneally with no significant intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery. These findings suggest that SRT is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach in median laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

摘要

目的

我们成功建立了吻合器修复技术(SRT),这是一种使用线性吻合器的简单腹腔镜里夫斯 - 斯托帕手术方法。本研究回顾性评估其短期疗效,以确定其安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾了2017年8月至2024年5月在我院接受腹腔镜正中切口疝修补术的87例患者的手术结果。患者接受腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)、腹腔镜经腹肌肉后补片修补术(TARM)或SRT治疗。

结果

在这些患者中,37例接受IPOM治疗,16例接受TARM治疗,34例接受SRT治疗,患者特征无显著差异。IPOM的中位手术时间(范围)为96分钟(50 - 211分钟),TARM为256分钟(196 - 300分钟),SRT为112分钟(60 - 289分钟)。IPOM的中位补片面积(范围)为210平方厘米(80 - 500平方厘米),TARM为500平方厘米(270 - 780平方厘米),SRT为379平方厘米(176 - 864平方厘米)。SRT组的手术时间明显短于TARM组(<0.001),补片面积也明显小于TARM组(=0.005)。与IPOM组相比,SRT组的手术时间无显著差异(=0.444),但补片面积明显更大(<0.001)。SRT组无明显术中并发症或转为开放手术的情况。

结论

SRT的手术时间与IPOM相当,比TARM明显更短。此外,SRT可在腹膜外进行,无明显术中并发症或转为开放手术的情况。这些发现表明,SRT是腹腔镜正中切口疝修补术中一种安全有效的微创方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/5d0a7fcfa933/AGS3-9-1086-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/2c900ce28946/AGS3-9-1086-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/af43b610048b/AGS3-9-1086-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/cddc114730b2/AGS3-9-1086-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/48a86c6a30c7/AGS3-9-1086-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/5d0a7fcfa933/AGS3-9-1086-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/2c900ce28946/AGS3-9-1086-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/af43b610048b/AGS3-9-1086-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/cddc114730b2/AGS3-9-1086-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/48a86c6a30c7/AGS3-9-1086-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ea/12414582/5d0a7fcfa933/AGS3-9-1086-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Approach Utilizing Linear Stapler for Midline Incisional Hernia: Stapler Repair Technique.利用线性吻合器治疗中线切口疝的微创方法:吻合器修复技术
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Apr 21;9(5):1086-1092. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70026. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
3
Drain versus no drain in elective open incisional hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis using the ACHQC database.择期开放性切口疝修补术中引流与不引流的比较:使用ACHQC数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 29;29(1):261. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03439-z.
4
Only-Glue Fixation in Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair of Midline Ventral Hernias: Technical Aspects and Short-Term Results of 40 Patients.仅胶水固定在腹腔镜中线腹疝腹膜内补片修补术中的应用:40例患者的技术要点及短期结果
Cureus. 2025 Jun 4;17(6):e85324. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85324. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Comparison of extended view totally extraperitoneal with intraperitoneal onlay mesh for primary ventral hernia surgery: A randomised controlled study from a tertiary university hospital.扩展视野完全腹膜外修补术与腹腔内补片修补术治疗原发性腹疝的比较:一项来自三级大学医院的随机对照研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_52_25.
6
Clinical outcomes and costs of retromuscular and intraperitoneal onlay mesh techniques in robotic incisional hernia repair.机器人切口疝修补术中后肌膜和腹腔内覆盖网技术的临床结果和成本。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2850-2856. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10776-0. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
7
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
8
Short-term outcomes after robot-assisted retromuscular versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of small-to-medium ventral hernias: a prospective, multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis.机器人辅助肌后修补与腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补中、小型腹疝的短期疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、倾向评分匹配分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 23;29(1):257. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03431-7.
9
Long-term mesh-related complications from minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh for small to medium-sized ventral hernias.微创经腹腔内置补片修补术治疗小至中型腹外疝的长期网片相关并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10716-y. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
10
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement Versus Primary Suture for Abdominal Wall Closure after Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Midline Laparotomy Incision: Updated Systematic Review Including Time-To-Event Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.预防性补片加固与直接缝合在经腹直肌切口行择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后腹壁关闭中的应用:包括时间事件荟萃分析和随机对照试验序贯分析的更新系统评价。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;109:149-161. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.026. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the pre-operative application of botulinum toxin for ventral hernia repair.系统评价和荟萃分析术前应用肉毒毒素治疗腹疝修补术。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):807-818. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02816-w. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
2
Inguinal single-port approach of endoscopic component separation for abdominal wall defects: A case series.腹股沟单孔法内镜下腹壁缺损组织分离术:病例系列
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Sep 9;82:104611. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104611. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of technical aspects and clinical outcomes of botulinum toxin prior to abdominal wall reconstruction.
腹壁重建前应用肉毒毒素的技术方面和临床结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1413-1425. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02499-1. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair.一种使用增强型完全腹膜外(eTEP)技术的腹腔镜肌后疝修补的新方法。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1525-1532. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5840-2. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
5
Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review.腹疝管理:基于系统评价的专家共识
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):80-89. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701.
6
Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique (EMILOS)-a new technique for ventral hernia repair.内镜下迷你/小切口腹膜前修补技术(EMILOS)——一种腹疝修补新技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1522-0. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
7
Transabdominal midline reconstruction by minimally invasive surgery: technique and results.经腹中线微创重建手术:技术与结果
Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):257-65. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1457-y. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
8
Retro-rectus repair of complex incisional hernia leads to low recurrence rate.
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jul;87(7-8):591-594. doi: 10.1111/ans.13402. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术中筋膜缺损的闭合与非闭合:文献综述
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):764-73. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience.1326例采用常规缝合理念的腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术的长期疗效:单中心经验
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y. Epub 2015 Jun 21.