• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于保乳手术后手术切缘和切除体积的全国性病理学研究:仍有很大的收获空间。

A nationwide pathology study on surgical margins and excision volumes after breast-conserving surgery: There is still much to be gained.

作者信息

Haloua M H, Volders J H, Krekel N M A, Barbé E, Sietses C, Jóźwiak K, Meijer S, van den Tol M P

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP Ede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast. 2016 Feb;25:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2015.11.003
PMID:26801411
Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

The current study aims to assess margin status in relation to amount of healthy breast tissue resected in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) on a nationwide scale.

METHODS

Using PALGA (a nationwide network and registry of histology and cytopathology in the Netherlands), all patients who underwent BCS for primary invasive carcinoma in 2012-13 were selected (10,058 excerpts). 9276 pathology excerpts were analyzed for a range of criteria including oncological margin status and distance to closest margin, specimen weight/volume, greatest tumor diameter, and with or without localization method. Calculated resection ratios (CRR) were assessed to determine excess healthy breast tissue resection.

RESULTS

Margins for invasive carcinoma and in situ carcinoma combined were tumor-involved in 498 (5.4%) and focally involved in 1021 cases (11.0%) of cases. Unsatisfactory resections including (focally) involved margins and margins ≤ 1 mm were reported in 33.8% of patients. The median lumpectomy volume was 46 cc (range 1-807 cc; SD 49.18) and median CRR 2.32 (range 0.10-104.17; SD 3.23), indicating the excision of 2.3 the optimal resection volume.

CONCLUSION

The unacceptable rate of tumor-involved margins as well as margins ≤ 1 mm in one third of all patients is also achieved at the expense of healthy breast tissue resection, which may carry the drawback of high rates of cosmetic failure. These data clearly suggest the need for improvement in current breast conserving surgical procedures to decrease tumor-involved margin rates while reducing the amount of healthy breast tissue resected.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在在全国范围内评估保乳手术(BCS)中切缘状态与切除的健康乳腺组织量之间的关系。

方法

利用PALGA(荷兰全国性的组织学和细胞病理学网络及登记处),选取了2012 - 13年因原发性浸润性癌接受保乳手术的所有患者(10,058份摘录)。对9276份病理摘录进行了一系列标准分析,包括肿瘤切缘状态和距最近切缘的距离、标本重量/体积、最大肿瘤直径以及是否采用定位方法。计算切除率(CRR)以确定健康乳腺组织切除过量的情况。

结果

浸润性癌和原位癌合并的切缘在498例(5.4%)病例中被肿瘤累及,在1021例(11.0%)病例中局灶性累及。33.8%的患者报告了不满意的切除情况,包括(局灶性)累及切缘和切缘≤1毫米。乳房肿块切除术的中位体积为46立方厘米(范围1 - 807立方厘米;标准差49.18),中位CRR为2.32(范围0.10 - 104.17;标准差3.23),表明切除了2.3倍的最佳切除体积。

结论

三分之一的患者中出现不可接受的肿瘤累及切缘率以及切缘≤1毫米的情况,这也是以切除健康乳腺组织为代价的,这可能带来高美容失败率的缺点。这些数据清楚地表明,需要改进当前的保乳手术程序,以降低肿瘤累及切缘率,同时减少切除的健康乳腺组织量。

相似文献

1
A nationwide pathology study on surgical margins and excision volumes after breast-conserving surgery: There is still much to be gained.一项关于保乳手术后手术切缘和切除体积的全国性病理学研究:仍有很大的收获空间。
Breast. 2016 Feb;25:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
2
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast-conserving surgery - Consequences on margin status and excision volumes: A nationwide pathology study.保乳手术中的新辅助化疗——对切缘状态和切除体积的影响:一项全国性病理学研究
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;42(7):986-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.252. Epub 2016 May 4.
3
Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.术中切缘评估能否改善切缘状态及再次切除率?一项基于人群的导管原位癌保乳手术结局分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;118(7):1205-1211. doi: 10.1002/jso.25248. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
4
Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?术中触摸准备细胞学检查;它在再切除乳房肿块切除术中起作用吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
5
Optimising surgical accuracy in palpable breast cancer with intra-operative breast ultrasound--feasibility and surgeons' learning curve.术中乳腺超声在可触及乳腺癌中优化手术准确性——可行性和外科医生的学习曲线。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;37(12):1044-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.08.127. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
6
Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.保乳手术后手术切缘的预测因素:一项基于大样本人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):627-633. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5532-5. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
7
Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.超声引导下保乳手术后,切缘阳性患者的再次切除率较低。
Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
8
The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.术前乳腺粗针穿刺活检结果对切除组织体积、切缘状态及美容效果的重要性。
J BUON. 2013 Jul-Sep;18(3):601-7.
9
Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival.保乳手术后对于切缘局部阳性不进行再次切除不会损害无病生存率和总生存率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;164(1):157-167. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4232-6. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Involved anterior margins after breast conserving surgery: is re-excision required?保乳手术后涉及前边缘:需要再次切除吗?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;38(4):302-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of neoadjuvant systemic therapy on surgical and radiotherapy outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer: a cross-sectional retrospective single-center study.新辅助全身治疗对早期乳腺癌患者手术和放疗结果的影响:一项横断面回顾性单中心研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1046. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14438-9.
2
The misunderstanding of the R Classification-a survey amongst medical specialties treating breast cancer.R 分类的误解——一项针对乳腺癌治疗的医学专业调查。
Virchows Arch. 2024 Sep;485(3):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-03876-8. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
3
Resection Ratios and Tumor Eccentricity in Breast-Conserving Surgery Specimens for Surgical Accuracy Assessment.
保乳手术标本中的切除率和肿瘤偏心度用于手术准确性评估
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 9;16(10):1813. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101813.
4
Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.不可触及乳腺病变定位方法的演变:从转化医学角度的文献综述
Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 15;5:12. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-23-49. eCollection 2024.
5
Wire- and magnetic-seed-guided localization of impalpable breast lesions: iBRA-NET localisation study.导丝和磁定位引导触诊阴性乳腺病变的定位:iBRA-NET 定位研究。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 24;109(3):274-282. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab443.
6
Optical tissue measurements of invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ for surgical guidance.光学组织测量浸润性癌和导管原位癌以指导手术。
Breast Cancer Res. 2021 May 22;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01436-5.
7
Preoperative non-palpable breast lesion localization, innovative techniques and clinical outcomes in surgical practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.术前不可触及的乳腺病变定位,手术实践中的创新技术和临床结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast. 2021 Aug;58:93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining.临床相关的双探头差异标本成像(DDSI)方案,用于新鲜切除的乳腺癌标本染色。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08179-8.
9
Mapping of multifocal breast cancer to achieve negative margins: A new step in the evolution of conservative breast surgery(A cohort study).多灶性乳腺癌切缘阴性的手术规划:保乳手术进展中的新举措(一项队列研究)
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jun 4;56:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.030. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care.重复乳房手术作为乳腺癌护理质量指标的价值
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):340-352. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08704-2. Epub 2020 Jun 10.