• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用户对执行全面药物评估的电子决策支持工具的看法——一项针对医生和护士的焦点小组研究

User perspectives on an electronic decision-support tool performing comprehensive medication reviews - a focus group study with physicians and nurses.

作者信息

Koskela Tuomas, Sandström Saana, Mäkinen Joonas, Liira Helena

机构信息

University of Tampere, Department of General Practice, Lääkärinkatu 1, 33014, Tampereen yliopisto, Finland.

Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd, PO Box 874, 00101, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jan 22;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0245-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-016-0245-z
PMID:26801630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4724080/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although a number of studies have evaluated the effectiveness of computerized decision-support systems (CDSS), there is lack of data on user perspectives, barriers, and facilitators to the implementation of CDSSs in real-life surroundings. The aim of this study was to assess individually perceived barriers, facilitators and ideas influencing the CDSS implementation and usability.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, five focus groups were carried out with physicians and nurses separately at the Tampere City Health Center, Finland. The participants were end-users of the EBMeDS computerized decision support system. An explorative data content analysis was applied.

RESULTS

The most important barrier to benefitting from CDSS was the lack of structured and coded diagnosis documentation and outdated medication information in the electronic health records. This led to false alerts and distrust towards the system. Among the major facilitators found were e.g. the beneficial reminders that helped practitioners take into account matters otherwise ignored; automatic glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculations; medication safety checks; and the summaries in the single medication review at a glance.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' and nurses' are keen to use the CDSS and it may enhance their inter-professional collaboration. Documenting patient information in a structured, uniform and easy manner is the essential starting point for electronic decision support. When implementing CDSS, managers need to focus on common practices in documenting structured data in their organizations in order to prevent undermining trust in the system.

摘要

背景

尽管已有多项研究评估了计算机化决策支持系统(CDSS)的有效性,但缺乏关于用户观点、在现实环境中实施CDSS的障碍和促进因素的数据。本研究的目的是评估个体感知到的影响CDSS实施和可用性的障碍、促进因素及想法。

方法

在这项定性研究中,分别在芬兰坦佩雷市卫生中心与医生和护士进行了5次焦点小组讨论。参与者是EBMeDS计算机化决策支持系统的终端用户。采用探索性数据内容分析。

结果

从CDSS中获益的最重要障碍是电子健康记录中缺乏结构化和编码的诊断文档以及过时的用药信息。这导致了错误警报和对系统的不信任。发现的主要促进因素包括例如有助于从业者考虑到否则会被忽略的事项的有益提醒;自动肾小球滤过率(GFR)计算;用药安全检查;以及单次用药审查中的一目了然的总结。

结论

医生和护士热衷于使用CDSS,它可能会增强他们的跨专业协作。以结构化、统一且简便的方式记录患者信息是电子决策支持的关键起点。在实施CDSS时,管理者需要关注其组织中记录结构化数据的常见做法,以防止破坏对系统的信任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143d/4724080/e7eeb10ae8b7/12911_2016_245_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143d/4724080/064ed77dcd69/12911_2016_245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143d/4724080/e7eeb10ae8b7/12911_2016_245_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143d/4724080/064ed77dcd69/12911_2016_245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143d/4724080/e7eeb10ae8b7/12911_2016_245_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
User perspectives on an electronic decision-support tool performing comprehensive medication reviews - a focus group study with physicians and nurses.用户对执行全面药物评估的电子决策支持工具的看法——一项针对医生和护士的焦点小组研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jan 22;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0245-z.
2
What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians.哪些因素可能有助于或阻碍计算机化决策支持系统(CDSSs)的实施:一项针对医生的焦点小组研究
Fam Pract. 2008 Jun;25(3):162-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn020. Epub 2008 May 25.
3
Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers.基层医疗中多领域覆盖计算机化决策支持系统的实施:一项关于感知障碍的焦点小组研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Oct 12;15:82. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0205-z.
4
User Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Electronic Health Records in Behavioral Hospitals: Qualitative Study.行为医院实施电子健康记录的障碍与促进因素的用户观点:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 8;5(4):e18764. doi: 10.2196/18764.
5
How to improve vital sign data quality for use in clinical decision support systems? A qualitative study in nine Swedish emergency departments.如何提高用于临床决策支持系统的生命体征数据质量?一项针对瑞典九个急诊科的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jun 4;16:61. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0305-4.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the use of computer-based intensive insulin therapy.使用基于计算机的强化胰岛素治疗的障碍和促进因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Dec;80(12):863-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
7
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Drug Allergy Checking: Systematic Review.用于药物过敏检查的临床决策支持系统:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 7;20(9):e258. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8206.
8
Factors influencing implementation of a computerized, individualized, culturally tailored lupus decision aid in lupus clinics: a qualitative semi-structured interview study.影响狼疮诊所中使用计算机化、个体化、文化适应的狼疮决策辅助工具的因素:一项定性半结构式访谈研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;38(10):2793-2801. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04643-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Prescriber perceptions of medication-related computerized decision support systems in hospitals: A synthesis of qualitative research.医疗机构中药物相关计算机化决策支持系统的处方医师认知:定性研究综合分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.024. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
10
[Computerized decision support systems: EBM at the bedside].[计算机化决策支持系统:床边的循证医学]
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Nov;107(11):589-591. doi: 10.1701/2484.25970.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitator and Barrier to Health Information System Use from Health Professionals Perspective: A Scoping Review.从卫生专业人员角度看健康信息系统使用的促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 7;18:3901-3920. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S515295. eCollection 2025.
2
Identifying Medication Review Topics to Be Documented in a Structured Form in Electronic Health Record Systems: Delphi Consensus Survey.确定要在电子健康记录系统中以结构化形式记录的药物审查主题:德尔菲共识调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e70133. doi: 10.2196/70133.
3
Optimizing Clinical Decision Support System Functionality by Leveraging Specific Human-Computer Interaction Elements: Insights From a Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Polypharmacy in chronic diseases-Reduction of Inappropriate Medication and Adverse drug events in older populations by electronic Decision Support (PRIMA-eDS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.慢性病中的多重用药——通过电子决策支持减少老年人群不适当用药和药物不良事件(PRIMA-eDS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Jan 29;17:57. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1177-8.
2
Nurses' use of clinical decision support: a literature review.护士对临床决策支持系统的应用:一项文献综述。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2014 Dec;32(12):562-8. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000110.
3
Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of computerized clinical decision support systems in specialty hospitals: protocol for a qualitative cross-sectional study.
通过利用特定人机交互元素优化临床决策支持系统功能:系统评价的见解
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 6;12:e69333. doi: 10.2196/69333.
4
Barriers to Adoption of a Child-Abuse Clinical Decision Support System in Emergency Departments.急诊科采用儿童虐待临床决策支持系统的障碍。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;25(6):1011-1019. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18501.
5
General practitioners' user experience of the nationwide digital decision support system in primary care.全科医生对全国基层医疗数字决策支持系统的用户体验
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241271816. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271816. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
We Ask and Listen: A Group-Wide Retrospective Survey on Satisfaction with Digital Medication Software.我们询问与倾听:一项关于数字药物软件满意度的全集团回顾性调查。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Mar 2;17:923-936. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S446896. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.探讨专业身份在临床决策支持系统实施中的作用——叙事性综述。
Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 12;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01339-x.
8
Barriers and facilitators of health professionals in adopting digital health-related tools for medication appropriateness: A systematic review.医疗专业人员采用数字健康相关工具促进用药合理性的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 17;10:20552076231225133. doi: 10.1177/20552076231225133. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Opportunities for clinical decision support targeting medication safety in remote primary care management of chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study in Northern Australia.在慢性肾脏病远程初级保健管理中针对药物安全的临床决策支持机会:澳大利亚北部的一项定性研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Jun;31(5):656-666. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231204545. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
10
Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review.运用慢性病照护模式考察基层医疗环境中的护理流程:一项伞式综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 4;24(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3.
专科医院采用计算机化临床决策支持系统的障碍与促进因素:一项定性横断面研究方案
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 28;9:105. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0105-0.
4
Theory of planned behaviour can help understand processes underlying the use of two emergency medicine diagnostic imaging rules.计划行为理论有助于理解两种急诊医学诊断成像规则使用背后的过程。
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 7;9:88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0088-x.
5
The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机化医嘱录入在减少医院环境中可预防的药物不良事件和用药错误方面的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 4;3:56. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-56.
6
Overrides of medication-related clinical decision support alerts in outpatients.门诊患者中药物相关临床决策支持警报的覆盖。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):487-91. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001813. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
7
Clinical decision support must be useful, functional is not enough: a qualitative study of computer-based clinical decision support in primary care.临床决策支持必须有用,仅仅具有功能性是不够的:初级保健中基于计算机的临床决策支持的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct 8;12:349. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-349.
8
Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review.临床决策支持系统的效果:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):29-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450.
9
Family physicians' perceptions and use of electronic clinical decision support during the first year of implementation.家庭医生在实施电子临床决策支持系统的第一年中的认知和使用情况。
J Med Syst. 2012 Dec;36(6):3677-84. doi: 10.1007/s10916-012-9841-3. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
10
Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis.电子健康记录中初级保健医生收到的通知:分类和时间分析。
Am J Med. 2012 Feb;125(2):209.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.029.