Yu Jiandong, Swietek Bogumila, Proddutur Archana, Santhakumar Vijayalakshmi
Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, PR China; Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Neurobiol Dis. 2016 May;89:23-35. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
Altered inhibition is a salient feature of hippocampal network reorganization in epilepsy. Hippocampal pyramidal cells and dentate granule cells show specific reduction in cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R)-sensitive GABAergic inputs in experimental epilepsy. In the dentate gyrus, CB1Rs regulate synaptic release from accommodating interneurons (AC-INs) with adapting firing characteristics and axonal projections in the molecular layer, but not from fast-spiking basket cells (FS-BCs). However, it is not known whether the intrinsic physiology and synaptic inhibition of AC-INs responsible for CB1R-sensitive inhibition is altered in epilepsy. Using the pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus (SE) model of epilepsy, we find that the basic physiological characteristics of AC-INs in epileptic rats are not different from age-matched controls. In paired interneuronal recordings, the amplitude of unitary inhibitory synaptic currents (uIPSCs) between AC-INs doubled after SE. Non-stationary noise analysis revealed that the post-SE strengthening of synapses between AC-INs resulted from an increase in postsynaptic receptors. Baseline synaptic release and CB1R antagonist enhancement of release at synapses between AC-INs were not different between control and post-SE rats. Additionally, uIPSC amplitude in FS-BCs to AC-INs pairs was unchanged after SE indicating input-specific microcircuit alterations in inhibitory inputs to AC-INs. At the network level, AC-INs showed no reduction in spontaneous and miniature inhibitory synaptic current (sIPSC or mIPSC) frequency or amplitude after SE. However, AC-IN mIPSC amplitude was persistently enhanced in post-SE and epileptic rats. CB1R agonist reduced the amplitude and suppressed a greater proportion of sIPSCs in AC-INs from post-SE and epileptic rats demonstrating a novel, cell-type specific increase in CB1R-sensitive inhibition of AC-INs after SE. This unique post-SE strengthening of inhibition between AC-INs could lead to activity-dependent suppression of AC-IN firing and compromise dentate CB1R-sensitive inhibition in epilepsy.
抑制改变是癫痫中海马网络重组的一个显著特征。在实验性癫痫中,海马锥体细胞和齿状颗粒细胞显示出1型大麻素受体(CB1R)敏感的GABA能输入的特异性减少。在齿状回中,CB1R调节来自具有适应性放电特征和分子层轴突投射的适应性中间神经元(AC-INs)的突触释放,但不调节快速放电篮状细胞(FS-BCs)的突触释放。然而,尚不清楚负责CB1R敏感抑制的AC-INs的内在生理学和突触抑制在癫痫中是否发生改变。使用毛果芸香碱诱导的癫痫持续状态(SE)模型,我们发现癫痫大鼠中AC-INs的基本生理特征与年龄匹配的对照无差异。在成对的中间神经元记录中,SE后AC-INs之间的单突触抑制性突触电流(uIPSCs)幅度增加了一倍。非平稳噪声分析表明,SE后AC-INs之间突触的增强是由于突触后受体增加所致。对照大鼠和SE后大鼠之间,AC-INs之间突触的基线突触释放和CB1R拮抗剂对释放的增强没有差异。此外,SE后FS-BCs与AC-INs对之间的uIPSC幅度没有变化,表明AC-INs的抑制性输入存在输入特异性微电路改变。在网络水平上,SE后AC-INs的自发和微小抑制性突触电流(sIPSC或mIPSC)频率或幅度没有降低。然而,SE后和癫痫大鼠中AC-INs的mIPSC幅度持续增强。CB1R激动剂降低了SE后和癫痫大鼠AC-INs中sIPSCs的幅度并抑制了更大比例的sIPSCs,表明SE后AC-INs的CB1R敏感抑制有新的、细胞类型特异性增加。AC-INs之间这种独特的SE后抑制增强可能导致AC-INs放电的活动依赖性抑制,并损害癫痫中齿状回CB1R敏感抑制。