Hu Junguo, Zhou Jian, Zhou Guomo, Luo Yiqi, Xu Xiaojun, Li Pingheng, Liang Junyi
Information Engineering College of Zhejiang A & F University, Linan, PR China.
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Forestry Intelligent Monitoring and Information Technology Research, Linan, PR China.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0146589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146589. eCollection 2016.
Soil respiration inherently shows strong spatial variability. It is difficult to obtain an accurate characterization of soil respiration with an insufficient number of monitoring points. However, it is expensive and cumbersome to deploy many sensors. To solve this problem, we proposed employing the Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME) algorithm, using soil temperature as auxiliary information, to study the spatial distribution of soil respiration. The BME algorithm used the soft data (auxiliary information) effectively to improve the estimation accuracy of the spatiotemporal distribution of soil respiration. Based on the functional relationship between soil temperature and soil respiration, the BME algorithm satisfactorily integrated soil temperature data into said spatial distribution. As a means of comparison, we also applied the Ordinary Kriging (OK) and Co-Kriging (Co-OK) methods. The results indicated that the root mean squared errors (RMSEs) and absolute values of bias for both Day 1 and Day 2 were the lowest for the BME method, thus demonstrating its higher estimation accuracy. Further, we compared the performance of the BME algorithm coupled with auxiliary information, namely soil temperature data, and the OK method without auxiliary information in the same study area for 9, 21, and 37 sampled points. The results showed that the RMSEs for the BME algorithm (0.972 and 1.193) were less than those for the OK method (1.146 and 1.539) when the number of sampled points was 9 and 37, respectively. This indicates that the former method using auxiliary information could reduce the required number of sampling points for studying spatial distribution of soil respiration. Thus, the BME algorithm, coupled with soil temperature data, can not only improve the accuracy of soil respiration spatial interpolation but can also reduce the number of sampling points.
土壤呼吸本质上具有很强的空间变异性。监测点数量不足时,很难准确表征土壤呼吸。然而,部署许多传感器既昂贵又麻烦。为了解决这个问题,我们提出采用贝叶斯最大熵(BME)算法,将土壤温度作为辅助信息,来研究土壤呼吸的空间分布。BME算法有效地利用了软数据(辅助信息),提高了土壤呼吸时空分布的估计精度。基于土壤温度与土壤呼吸之间的函数关系,BME算法将土壤温度数据令人满意地整合到了上述空间分布中。作为对比手段,我们还应用了普通克里金法(OK)和协同克里金法(Co-OK)。结果表明,第一天和第二天的均方根误差(RMSE)和偏差绝对值,BME方法都是最低的,从而证明了其更高的估计精度。此外,我们在同一研究区域比较了结合辅助信息(即土壤温度数据)的BME算法和无辅助信息的OK方法在9个、21个和37个采样点时的性能。结果表明,当采样点数量分别为9个和37个时,BME算法的RMSE(分别为0.972和1.193)小于OK方法(分别为1.146和1.539)。这表明使用辅助信息的前一种方法可以减少研究土壤呼吸空间分布所需的采样点数。因此,结合土壤温度数据的BME算法不仅可以提高土壤呼吸空间插值的精度,还可以减少采样点数。