Fan Lin, Yu Xiao, Zan Pengfei, Liu Jin, Ji Tongxiang, Li Guodong
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Nan Jing Medical University, Nangjing, People's Republic of China.
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1361-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.028. Epub 2015 Dec 20.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually associated with severe postoperative pain, which can prevent rehabilitation of patients' knee function and influence the satisfaction of surgery. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) as a new method to managing postoperative pain has been applied in clinical practice recently. However, the safety and efficacy of LIA compared with femoral nerve block (FNB) in postoperative pain management of TKA still remains controversial. Thus, we conducted an original clinical trial to compare LIA and FNB.
One hundred fifty-seven patients undergoing TKA were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, single-center study. The patients received either FNB (group A) or periarticular infiltration of local anesthetic (group B). The morphine consumption used in patient-controlled analgesia after surgery, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Knee Society Score, and range of motion before and after surgery in both groups were analyzed, as well as the adverse effects.
Group A consisted 78 patients, and group B contained 79 patients. The patients' characteristics including age and body mass index had no significant difference (P > .05). Morphine consumption, VAS at rest, range of motion, and Knee Society Score were similar between the 2 groups. Our study showed group B, the local anesthetic group had less VAS with movement on postoperative day 1 (P = .01) than that of group A, which means a better pain control. Because of the study design, the surgery time showed no significant difference. Eighteen patients in group A and 21 patients in group B experienced mild-to-medium nausea or vomiting. One patient in group B had dizziness and one patient in group A suffered a neuropraxic injury to the femoral nerve. No urinary retention case was seen during inpatient days. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups about side effects.
Our research showed that no significant differences were observed between the 2 treatment groups. LIA could provide a similar analgesic effect to FNBs with a low incidence of complications.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)通常伴有严重的术后疼痛,这可能会妨碍患者膝关节功能的恢复,并影响手术满意度。局部浸润镇痛(LIA)作为一种管理术后疼痛的新方法,最近已应用于临床实践。然而,在TKA术后疼痛管理中,与股神经阻滞(FNB)相比,LIA的安全性和有效性仍存在争议。因此,我们开展了一项原始临床试验来比较LIA和FNB。
157例行TKA的患者纳入一项随机、双盲、单中心研究。患者接受FNB(A组)或关节周围局部麻醉药浸润(B组)。分析两组患者术后自控镇痛中吗啡的用量、术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)、膝关节协会评分以及手术前后的活动范围,以及不良反应。
A组78例患者,B组79例患者。患者的年龄和体重指数等特征无显著差异(P>.05)。两组之间的吗啡用量、静息时VAS、活动范围和膝关节协会评分相似。我们的研究表明,B组(局部麻醉药组)术后第1天活动时的VAS低于A组(P=.01),这意味着疼痛控制更好。由于研究设计,手术时间无显著差异。A组18例患者和B组21例患者出现轻至中度恶心或呕吐。B组1例患者头晕,A组1例患者股神经发生神经失用性损伤。住院期间未观察到尿潴留病例。两组之间的副作用无显著差异。
我们的研究表明,两个治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。LIA可提供与FNB相似的镇痛效果,且并发症发生率较低。