Toogood J H, Baskerville J, Jennings B, Lefcoe N M, Johansson S A
Department of Medicine, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Nov;84(5 Pt 1):688-700. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90297-2.
We determined the relative antiasthmatic and systemic glucocorticoid potencies of inhaled budesonide (BUD) versus morning-dose oral prednisone (PRED) in 34 adult patients with asthma over a dose range extending from conventional to high and potentially toxic levels, 3.2 mg of BUD or 40 mg of PRED per day. Changes in symptom frequency and severity, FEV1, and peak expiratory flow rate were measured during a double-blind, double-dummy controlled, crossover protocol. The drugs proved equally effective, provided a sufficient dosage was administered. The dose required to eliminate recurrently disabling asthma relapses in these patients was about 2.0 mg of BUD per day or greater than 40 mg of PRED per day. On the average, BUD doses greater than or equal to 1.84 mg/day/70 kg adult (26.3 micrograms/kg/day) exhibited systemic effects on the 8 AM serum cortisol level and blood eosinophil count equivalent to greater than or equal to 15 mg of PRED per day. The latter doses are known to be associated with steroid-induced complications, such as osteoporosis. However, the level of systemic glucocorticoid activity produced by any particular dose of BUD in these patients was consistently much lower than that produced by the dose of PRED needed to achieve an equivalent level of antiasthmatic response. Thus, the use of high-dose inhaled BUD appears clinically reasonable and ethically acceptable in patients with severe asthma in whom the alternative is their continuing dependency on PRED.
我们在34名成年哮喘患者中,确定了吸入布地奈德(BUD)与晨起口服泼尼松(PRED)相比的相对抗哮喘及全身糖皮质激素效力,剂量范围从常规水平延伸至高剂量及潜在毒性水平,即每天3.2毫克BUD或40毫克PRED。在一项双盲、双模拟对照的交叉试验方案中,测量了症状频率和严重程度、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)及呼气峰值流速的变化。结果证明,只要给予足够剂量,两种药物同样有效。在这些患者中,消除反复发作的致残性哮喘复发所需的剂量约为每天2.0毫克BUD或大于40毫克PRED。平均而言,BUD剂量大于或等于1.84毫克/天/70千克成人(26.3微克/千克/天)时,对上午8点的血清皮质醇水平和血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数产生的全身效应相当于每天大于或等于15毫克PRED。已知后一剂量会引发类固醇诱导的并发症,如骨质疏松症。然而,在这些患者中,任何特定剂量的BUD产生的全身糖皮质激素活性水平始终远低于达到同等抗哮喘反应水平所需的PRED剂量所产生的水平。因此,对于重度哮喘患者,如果他们别无选择只能继续依赖PRED,那么使用高剂量吸入BUD在临床和伦理上似乎都是合理且可接受的。