Suppr超能文献

创伤机制在老年重伤员分诊中的价值

The Value of the Trauma Mechanism in the Triage of Severely Injured Elderly.

作者信息

Nijboer Johanna M M, van der Sluis Corry K, Dijkstra Pieter U, Ten Duis Hendrik-Jan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Feb;35(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-7069-1. Epub 2008 Mar 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The triage of trauma patients is currently based on the trauma mechanism. However, it is known that elderly patients can sustain severe injuries due to insignificant trauma mechanisms. As such, triage methods might be questionable.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether current trauma triage criteria are appropriate in severely injured elderly patients.

METHODS

To analyze the effect of the trauma mechanism on triage and treatment, consecutive patients ≥ 55 years of age, with an injury severity score > 15, treated from 2002 to 2005 were divided into those who sustained a high-energy trauma (HET) versus a low energy trauma (LET). Pre-hospital and in-hospital data, injury characteristics, and data on mortality and disablement one year postinjury (sickness impact profile) were analyzed for HET and LET groups.

RESULTS

Age, sex and co-morbidity rate were similar in 84 HET patients and 107 LET patients. HET patients (mean ISS 28) received more sophisticated trauma care than LET patients (mean ISS 22), although mortality was similar (38 vs. 34%). Long-term disablement was also similar (median SIP scores 4 vs. 6). Severe head injuries and the Revised Trauma Score were related to mortality. Physical disablement was related to preexisting co-morbidities. No variables were related to psychosocial disablement.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly people a low energy trauma may lead to severe consequences. Not only the trauma mechanism, but also age, co-morbidity, and the likelihood of a brain injury should be leading in the triage and subsequent management of severely injured elderly.

摘要

背景

目前创伤患者的分诊基于创伤机制。然而,众所周知,老年患者可能因轻微的创伤机制而遭受严重损伤。因此,分诊方法可能存在问题。

目的

评估当前的创伤分诊标准对严重受伤的老年患者是否适用。

方法

为分析创伤机制对分诊和治疗的影响,将2002年至2005年期间连续收治的年龄≥55岁、损伤严重度评分>15的患者分为高能量创伤(HET)组和低能量创伤(LET)组。分析了HET组和LET组的院前和院内数据、损伤特征以及伤后一年的死亡率和残疾情况(疾病影响概况)。

结果

84例HET患者和107例LET患者的年龄、性别和合并症发生率相似。HET组患者(平均ISS 28)比LET组患者(平均ISS 22)接受了更复杂的创伤治疗,尽管死亡率相似(38%对34%)。长期残疾情况也相似(SIP评分中位数4对6)。严重颅脑损伤和修订创伤评分与死亡率相关。身体残疾与既往合并症相关。没有变量与心理社会残疾相关。

结论

在老年人中,低能量创伤可能导致严重后果。在对严重受伤的老年人进行分诊和后续管理时,不仅创伤机制,而且年龄、合并症和脑损伤的可能性都应作为主要考虑因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验