Suppr超能文献

重伤患者院前分诊协议的依从性。

Compliance with prehospital triage protocols for major trauma patients.

作者信息

Ma M H, MacKenzie E J, Alcorta R, Kelen G D

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1999 Jan;46(1):168-75. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199901000-00029.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The extent to which severely injured patients receive definitive care at trauma centers is determined by the accuracy of prehospital major trauma criteria in predicting severe injuries and by the level of compliance with these triage instructions by prehospital providers. This study was conducted to evaluate the level of compliance with triage criteria in an established trauma system.

METHODS

The study involved a retrospective analysis of the 1995 Maryland statewide prehospital ambulance data. Prehospital providers in Maryland are instructed to consider transporting patients meeting any of the three nonexclusive major trauma criteria-physiology, injury, and mechanism-to designated trauma centers. Compliance with these criteria was defined as the proportion of patients transported to designated trauma centers among those meeting prehospital triage criteria as documented on the ambulance trip report. Special emphasis was placed on differences in the levels of compliance by age of the trauma patients.

RESULTS

A total of 32,950 transports were analyzed. Patients meeting injury criteria were most likely to be transported to trauma centers (86%), followed by those meeting mechanism criteria (46%), and physiology criteria (34%). When the level of compliance was stratified by age, there was no age difference in the level of compliance for patients meeting injury criteria (90.5% for patients aged 0-54 years vs. 88.7% for patients aged 55+ years; p = 0.197). For older patients meeting physiology criteria only or for those meeting mechanism criteria only, however, compliance was differentially low. For patients meeting physiology criteria only, the compliance was 40.3% for patients aged 0 to 54 years and 23.9% for patients aged 55 years and older (p = 0.0001); for patients meeting mechanism criteria only, compliance was 47.0% for patients aged 0 to 54 years and 39.7% for patients aged 55+ years (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients meeting prehospital major trauma criteria were transported to designated trauma centers. Patients meeting only physiology criteria, however, were much less likely to be transported to trauma centers, and there was a differentially low compliance for elderly trauma patients meeting physiology criteria alone. The causes and consequences of lower compliance with triage instructions for the elderly population deserve further investigation.

摘要

背景

重伤患者在创伤中心接受确定性治疗的程度,取决于院前严重创伤标准预测重伤的准确性以及院前急救人员对这些分诊指示的遵守程度。本研究旨在评估一个既定创伤系统中对分诊标准的遵守程度。

方法

该研究对1995年马里兰州全州院前救护车数据进行了回顾性分析。马里兰州的院前急救人员被指示,考虑将符合三项非排他性主要创伤标准(生理学、损伤和机制)中任何一项的患者转运至指定的创伤中心。对这些标准的遵守程度定义为,在符合救护车行程报告中记录的院前分诊标准的患者中,被转运至指定创伤中心的患者比例。特别强调了创伤患者年龄在遵守程度上的差异。

结果

共分析了32950次转运。符合损伤标准的患者最有可能被转运至创伤中心(86%),其次是符合机制标准的患者(46%)和生理学标准的患者(34%)。当按年龄对遵守程度进行分层时,符合损伤标准的患者在遵守程度上没有年龄差异(0至54岁患者的遵守程度为90.5%,55岁及以上患者为88.7%;p = 0.197)。然而,对于仅符合生理学标准或仅符合机制标准的老年患者,遵守程度差异较低。对于仅符合生理学标准的患者,0至54岁患者的遵守程度为40.3%,55岁及以上患者为23.9%(p = 0.0001);对于仅符合机制标准的患者,0至54岁患者的遵守程度为47.0%,55岁及以上患者为39.7%(p = 0.002)。

结论

大多数符合院前主要创伤标准的患者被转运至指定的创伤中心。然而,仅符合生理学标准的患者被转运至创伤中心的可能性要小得多,而且仅符合生理学标准的老年创伤患者的遵守程度差异较低。老年人群对分诊指示遵守程度较低的原因及后果值得进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验