Janssen Christian, Ommen Oliver, Neugebauer Edmund, Lefering Rolf, Pfaff Holger
Department of Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, Institute and Polyclinic for Occupational and Social Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, Institute and Polyclinic for Occupational and Social Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Strasse 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008 Jun;34(3):277-86. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-7054-8. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
Due to remarkable improvements in emergency and intensive care medicine in the recent past, the mortality rate for severely injured patients is decreasing. Outcome research therefore should no longer focus only on questions of survival, but also on aspects of the quality of life after severe trauma. This study examined the long-term effect of different sociodemographic, economic, trauma, and hospital-related factors on the health-related quality of life (SF-36) of severely injured patients.
A written questionnaire was sent to 121 trauma patients who received treatment in two hospitals in Cologne/Northrhine-Westfalia between 1996 and 2001. The inclusion criteria were more than one injury and a sum of abbreviated injury score of the two worst injuries ≥ 6. The response rate after using the total-design-method was 77.6% (n = 90).
Severely injured patients showed significant reductions for all subscales of the SF-36, on average 4 years after discharge on average, in comparison to a German norm population. Specifically, aspects of the physical-component scale were dramatically reduced. Linear regressions controlling for time after discharge suggested that higher age, lower socioeconomic status, living together with a partner, and the severity of trauma and injury of extremities were significant predictors for a reduced quality of life, while satisfaction with the hospital stay had a positive effect.
All in all, it is important to identify trauma- patients who will suffer a reduced quality of life. In so doing, it will be possible to take into account the specific circumstances of their recovery during medical treatment, care, and rehabilitation.
由于近年来急诊和重症医学取得了显著进步,重伤患者的死亡率正在下降。因此,结果研究不应再仅关注生存问题,还应关注严重创伤后生活质量的各个方面。本研究考察了不同的社会人口统计学、经济、创伤及医院相关因素对重伤患者健康相关生活质量(SF-36)的长期影响。
向1996年至2001年间在科隆/北莱茵-威斯特法伦州的两家医院接受治疗的121名创伤患者发送了一份书面问卷。纳入标准为多处受伤且两处最严重损伤的简明损伤评分总和≥6。采用全设计方法后的回复率为77.6%(n = 90)。
与德国正常人群相比,重伤患者在出院平均4年后,SF-36所有子量表得分均显著降低。具体而言,身体成分量表方面大幅下降。对出院后时间进行控制的线性回归分析表明,年龄较大、社会经济地位较低、与伴侣同住、创伤严重程度以及四肢损伤是生活质量降低的显著预测因素,而对住院治疗的满意度则有积极影响。
总体而言,识别出生活质量将会降低的创伤患者很重要。这样做将有可能在医疗、护理和康复过程中考虑到他们康复的具体情况。