• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恐怖爆炸事件后大规模伤亡事件医疗管理中应避免的陷阱:医院视角

Pitfalls to avoid in the medical management of mass casualty incidents following terrorist bombings: the hospital perspective.

作者信息

Ashkenazi I, Turégano-Fuentes F, Einav S, Kessel B, Alfici R, Olsha O

机构信息

Surgery Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, P.O.Box 169, 38100, Hadera, Israel.

Emergency Surgery Department, Gregorio Marañon Medical Center, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Aug;40(4):445-50. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0403-x. Epub 2014 May 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-014-0403-x
PMID:26816239
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The unique patterns of injury following explosions together with the involvement of numerous physicians, most of whom are not experienced in trauma, may create problems in the medical management of mass casualty incidents.

METHODS

Four hundred patient files admitted in 19 mass casualty events following bombing incidents were reviewed and possible areas which could impact survival were defined.

RESULTS

Forty-nine (9.3 %) patients had an Injury Severity Score ≥16. Of 205 patients in whom triage decisions were available, 5 of 25 severely injured patients were undertriaged by the triage officers at the door of the hospital. Following primary evaluation inside the emergency department critical injuries in two patients were missed due to distracting, less serious injuries. Of 68 (16.1 %) patients who were operated, 28 were in need of either immediate, urgent or high-priority operations. Except for neurosurgical cases which needed to be transferred to other hospitals, there was no delay in surgery. One patient underwent negative laparotomy. There were 15 in-hospital deaths, 6 of which were deemed as either anticipated or unanticipated mortality with possibility for improvement.

CONCLUSION

Medical management should be evaluated following MCIs as this may illustrate possible problems which many need to be addressed in contingency planning.

摘要

背景

爆炸后独特的损伤模式以及众多医生的参与,其中大多数医生没有创伤治疗经验,这可能会给大规模伤亡事件的医疗管理带来问题。

方法

回顾了19起爆炸事件后大规模伤亡事件中收治的400份患者档案,并确定了可能影响生存的潜在领域。

结果

49名(9.3%)患者的损伤严重程度评分≥16。在205名有分诊决策的患者中,25名重伤患者中有5名在医院门口被分诊人员分诊不足。在急诊科进行初步评估后,由于存在分散注意力的不太严重的损伤,两名患者的严重损伤被漏诊。在68名(16.1%)接受手术的患者中,28名需要立即、紧急或优先手术。除了需要转往其他医院的神经外科病例外,手术没有延迟。一名患者接受了阴性剖腹探查术。有15例院内死亡,其中6例被认为是预期或意外死亡,有可能改善。

结论

大规模伤亡事件后应评估医疗管理情况,因为这可能会揭示应急计划中许多需要解决的潜在问题。

相似文献

1
Pitfalls to avoid in the medical management of mass casualty incidents following terrorist bombings: the hospital perspective.恐怖爆炸事件后大规模伤亡事件医疗管理中应避免的陷阱:医院视角
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Aug;40(4):445-50. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0403-x. Epub 2014 May 1.
2
The Impact of Age upon Contingency Planning for Multiple-casualty Incidents Based on a Single Center's Experience.基于单一中心经验探讨年龄对多伤亡事件应急规划的影响
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Oct;31(5):492-7. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000613. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
3
Medical consequences of suicide bombing mass casualty incidents: the impact of explosion setting on injury patterns.自杀式爆炸大规模伤亡事件的医学后果:爆炸设置对伤害模式的影响。
Injury. 2009 Jul;40(7):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.037. Epub 2009 May 5.
4
Terrorist bombings. Lessons learned from Belfast to Beirut.恐怖主义爆炸事件。从贝尔法斯特到贝鲁特的经验教训。
Ann Surg. 1988 Nov;208(5):569-76. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198811000-00005.
5
Precision of in-hospital triage in mass-casualty incidents after terror attacks.恐怖袭击后大规模伤亡事件中院内分诊的准确性
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):20-3. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00003277.
6
Terrorist suicide bombings: lessons learned in Metropolitan Haifa from September 2000 to January 2006.恐怖分子自杀式爆炸袭击:2000年9月至2006年1月在海法市学到的教训
Am J Disaster Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;4(4):233-48.
7
Mass casualty management after a suicidal terrorist attack on a religious procession in Quetta, Pakistan.巴基斯坦奎达一场针对宗教游行的自杀式恐怖袭击后的大规模伤亡管理。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006 Apr;16(4):253-6.
8
Rural hospital mass casualty response to a terrorist shooting spree.农村医院对恐怖分子枪击事件的大规模应急反应。
Br J Surg. 2013 Aug;100(9):1198-204. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9203.
9
The United States twenty-year experience with bombing incidents: implications for terrorism preparedness and medical response.美国二十年爆炸事件经验:对恐怖主义防范和医疗应对的启示
J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197853.49084.3c.
10
Functions and principles in the management of bombing mass casualty incidents: lessons learned at the Tel-Aviv Souraski Medical Center.爆炸大规模伤亡事件管理中的功能与原则:特拉维夫索罗卡医疗中心的经验教训
Eur J Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(6):329-34. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200412000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons learned from terror attacks: thematic priorities and development since 2001-results from a systematic review.从恐怖袭击中吸取的教训:2001 年以来的主题优先事项和发展——系统评价的结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2613-2638. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01858-y. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
Terrorist incidents: strategic treatment objectives, tactical diagnostic procedures and the estimated need of blood and clotting products.恐怖袭击事件:战略治疗目标、战术诊断程序以及血液和凝血产品的预估需求。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):695-707. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01399-w. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Qualitative Analysis of Surveyed Emergency Responders and the Identified Factors That Affect First Stage of Primary Triage Decision-Making of Mass Casualty Incidents.

本文引用的文献

1
The twin terrorist attacks in Norway on July 22, 2011: the trauma center response.2011 年 7 月 22 日挪威发生的两次恐怖袭击事件:创伤中心的应对措施。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jul;73(1):269-75. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a787f.
2
Injury patterns from major urban terrorist bombings in trains: the Madrid experience.马德里火车重大城市恐怖爆炸事件的损伤模式:马德里的经验。
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):1168-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9557-1.
3
The 2004 Madrid train bombings: an analysis of pre-hospital management.2004年马德里火车爆炸案:院前管理分析
对受访应急响应人员及影响大规模伤亡事件初级分诊决策第一阶段的已识别因素的定性分析。
PLoS Curr. 2016 Aug 19;8:ecurrents.dis.d69dafcfb3ad8be88b3e655bd38fba84. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.d69dafcfb3ad8be88b3e655bd38fba84.
4
Introduction to the 5th focus-on issue devoted to disaster and military surgery.第五届灾害与军事外科重点关注问题介绍。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Aug;40(4):419-20. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0428-1. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
Disasters. 2008 Mar;32(1):41-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01026.x.
4
Reduction in critical mortality in urban mass casualty incidents: analysis of triage, surge, and resource use after the London bombings on July 7, 2005.城市大规模伤亡事件中关键死亡率的降低:对2005年7月7日伦敦爆炸案后分诊、激增和资源使用情况的分析
Lancet. 2006 Dec 23;368(9554):2219-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69896-6.
5
Medical response to the 2005 terrorist bombings in London.对2005年伦敦恐怖爆炸事件的医疗应对措施。
Lancet. 2006 Dec 23;368(9554):2188-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69871-1.
6
Precision of in-hospital triage in mass-casualty incidents after terror attacks.恐怖袭击后大规模伤亡事件中院内分诊的准确性
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):20-3. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00003277.
7
Casualties treated at the closest hospital in the Madrid, March 11, terrorist bombings.3月11日马德里恐怖爆炸事件中,伤员在最近的医院接受治疗。
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;33(1 Suppl):S107-12. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000151072.17826.72.
8
Evacuation priorities in mass casualty terror-related events: implications for contingency planning.大规模伤亡恐怖相关事件中的疏散优先级:对应急预案的启示
Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):304-10. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114013.19114.57.
9
Suicide bombing attacks: update and modifications to the protocol.自杀式爆炸袭击:协议的更新与修改
Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):295-303. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114014.63423.55.
10
Medical consequences of terrorism. The conventional weapon threat.恐怖主义的医学后果。常规武器威胁。
Surg Clin North Am. 1999 Dec;79(6):1537-52. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70091-8.