对澳大利亚心理健康研究中最常用的自我报告测量方法的批判性解释性综述。
A critical interpretive synthesis of the most commonly used self-report measures in Australian mental health research.
作者信息
Bibb Jennifer, Baker Felicity A, Skewes McFerran Katrina
机构信息
PhD Candidate, National Music Therapy Research Unit, Melbourne Conservatorium of Music, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
Professor, National Music Therapy Research Unit, Melbourne Conservatorium of Music, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
出版信息
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;24(5):453-8. doi: 10.1177/1039856215626646. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
OBJECTIVE
To critically examine the self-report measures most commonly used in Australian mental health research in the last 10 years.
METHOD
A critical interpretive synthesis was conducted using seven outcome measures that were identified as most popular in 43 studies from three mental health journals.
RESULTS
Results suggest that the amount and type of language used in outcome measures is important in both increasing the accuracy of the data collected and fostering positive experiences of data collection for participants.
CONCLUSIONS
Results indicate that many of the measures most often used in Australian mental health research may not align with the current contemporary philosophy of mental health clinical practice in Australia.
目的
批判性地审视过去10年澳大利亚心理健康研究中最常用的自我报告测量方法。
方法
采用批判性解释性综合法，对从三本心理健康期刊的43项研究中确定为最常用的七种结果测量方法进行分析。
结果
结果表明，结果测量方法中使用的语言数量和类型对于提高所收集数据的准确性以及促进参与者积极的数据收集体验都很重要。
结论
结果表明，澳大利亚心理健康研究中最常使用的许多测量方法可能与澳大利亚当前心理健康临床实践的当代理念不一致。
Zotero 插件