• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鸟类对大西洋森林碎片化反应的时间滞后:恢复机遇与紧迫性

Time-Lag in Responses of Birds to Atlantic Forest Fragmentation: Restoration Opportunity and Urgency.

作者信息

Uezu Alexandre, Metzger Jean Paul

机构信息

Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas, Nazaré Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.

Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147909. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0147909
PMID:26820548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4731062/
Abstract

There are few opportunities to evaluate the relative importance of landscape structure and dynamics upon biodiversity, especially in highly fragmented tropical landscapes. Conservation strategies and species risk evaluations often rely exclusively on current aspects of landscape structure, although such limited assumptions are known to be misleading when time-lag responses occur. By relating bird functional-group richness to forest patch size and isolation in ten-year intervals (1956, 1965, 1978, 1984, 1993 and 2003), we revealed that birds with different sensitivity to fragmentation display contrasting responses to landscape dynamics in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For non-sensitive groups, there was no time-lag in response: the recent degree of isolation best explains their variation in richness, which likely relates to these species' flexibility to adapt to changes in landscape structure. However, for sensitive bird groups, the 1978 patch area was the best explanatory variable, providing evidence for a 25-year time-lag in response to habitat reduction. Time-lag was more likely in landscapes that encompass large patches, which can support temporarily the presence of some sensitive species, even when habitat cover is relatively low. These landscapes potentially support the most threatened populations and should be priorities for restoration efforts to avoid further species loss. Although time-lags provide an opportunity to counteract the negative consequences of fragmentation, it also reinforces the urgency of restoration actions. Fragmented landscapes will be depleted of biodiversity if landscape structure is only maintained, and not improved. The urgency of restoration action may be even higher in landscapes where habitat loss and fragmentation history is older and where no large fragment remained to act temporarily as a refuge.

摘要

评估景观结构和动态变化对生物多样性的相对重要性的机会很少,尤其是在高度破碎化的热带景观中。保护策略和物种风险评估通常仅依赖于景观结构的当前状况,尽管已知当出现时间滞后效应时,这种有限的假设会产生误导。通过将鸟类功能群丰富度与森林斑块大小和隔离度以十年为间隔(1956年、1965年、1978年、1984年、1993年和2003年)进行关联,我们发现,对破碎化敏感度不同的鸟类对巴西大西洋森林景观动态变化呈现出不同的响应。对于不敏感的鸟类群体,响应不存在时间滞后:近期的隔离程度最能解释它们丰富度的变化,这可能与这些物种适应景观结构变化的灵活性有关。然而,对于敏感的鸟类群体,1978年的斑块面积是最佳解释变量,这为响应栖息地减少存在25年的时间滞后提供了证据。在包含大片斑块的景观中,时间滞后效应更有可能出现,即使栖息地覆盖率相对较低,大片斑块也能暂时支持一些敏感物种的生存。这些景观可能支撑着最受威胁的种群,应成为恢复工作的重点,以避免进一步的物种丧失。尽管时间滞后效应为抵消破碎化的负面影响提供了机会,但它也强化了恢复行动的紧迫性。如果仅维持而非改善景观结构,破碎化的景观将丧失生物多样性。在栖息地丧失和破碎化历史较长且没有大片斑块可作为临时避难所的景观中,恢复行动的紧迫性可能更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/4731062/7820453bbe9e/pone.0147909.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/4731062/af13b576b0d9/pone.0147909.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/4731062/54052c352f34/pone.0147909.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/4731062/7820453bbe9e/pone.0147909.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/4731062/af13b576b0d9/pone.0147909.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/4731062/54052c352f34/pone.0147909.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/4731062/7820453bbe9e/pone.0147909.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Time-Lag in Responses of Birds to Atlantic Forest Fragmentation: Restoration Opportunity and Urgency.鸟类对大西洋森林碎片化反应的时间滞后:恢复机遇与紧迫性
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147909. eCollection 2016.
2
Direct and cascading effects of landscape structure on tropical forest and non-forest frugivorous birds.景观结构对热带森林和非森林果蝠的直接和级联效应。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Dec;28(8):2024-2032. doi: 10.1002/eap.1791. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Patterns and predictors of β-diversity in the fragmented Brazilian Atlantic forest: a multiscale analysis of forest specialist and generalist birds.巴西大西洋森林碎片化区域中β多样性的模式与预测因子:森林特有鸟类和泛化鸟类的多尺度分析
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):240-50. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12448. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
4
Associations of forest cover, fragment area, and connectivity with neotropical understory bird species richness and abundance.森林覆盖、片段面积和连通性与新热带林下鸟类物种丰富度和丰度的关联。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Dec;26(6):1100-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01940.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
5
Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: new insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research.人类改造的热带景观中的多种演替途径:来自森林演替、森林破碎化和景观生态学研究的新见解。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):326-340. doi: 10.1111/brv.12231. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
Birds in Anthropogenic Landscapes: The Responses of Ecological Groups to Forest Loss in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.人为景观中的鸟类:巴西大西洋森林生态群落对森林丧失的响应
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0128923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128923. eCollection 2015.
7
Threshold effect of habitat loss on bat richness in cerrado-forest landscapes.塞拉多森林景观中栖息地丧失对蝙蝠丰富度的阈值效应。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Sep;26(6):1854-1867. doi: 10.1890/15-1757.1.
8
Loss of species and functions in a deforested megadiverse tropical forest.森林砍伐导致热带生物多样性巨大多样性丧失物种和功能
Conserv Biol. 2024 Aug;38(4):e14250. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14250. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
9
Bird-community responses to habitat creation in a long-term, large-scale natural experiment.鸟类群落对长期大规模自然实验中栖息地创造的响应。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Apr;32(2):345-354. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12983. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
10
Thresholds of species loss in Amazonian deforestation frontier landscapes.亚马逊森林砍伐前沿景观中物种丧失的阈值。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):440-51. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12446. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of Multi-Land Use Decisions on Temperate Forest Habitat Quality in the Changbai Mountain Region, Northeast China.中国东北长白山地区多土地利用决策对温带森林栖息地质量的影响
Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar 27;15(4):e71123. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71123. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Planktonic functional diversity changes in synchrony with lake ecosystem state.浮游生物功能多样性与湖泊生态系统状态同步变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Feb;29(3):686-701. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16485. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
3
Habitat amount or landscape configuration: Emerging HotSpot analysis reveals the importance of habitat amount for a grassland bird in South Dakota.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: ecological findings and conservation initiatives.来自巴西大西洋森林的经验:生态研究结果与保护举措。
New Phytol. 2014 Nov;204(3):459-473. doi: 10.1111/nph.12989. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
2
Unraveling the drivers of community dissimilarity and species extinction in fragmented landscapes.揭示破碎化景观中群落差异和物种灭绝的驱动因素。
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2560-9. doi: 10.1890/11-2054.1.
3
The mechanisms causing extinction debts.导致灭绝债务的机制。
生境数量或景观配置:新兴热点分析揭示了生境数量对南达科他州一种草原鸟类的重要性。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 26;17(9):e0274808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274808. eCollection 2022.
4
How do habitat amount and habitat fragmentation drive time-delayed responses of biodiversity to land-use change?生境数量和生境破碎化如何驱动生物多样性对土地利用变化的时滞响应?
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jan 13;288(1942):20202466. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2466. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Fluctuating asymmetry and feather growth bars as biomarkers to assess the habitat quality of shade coffee farming for avian diversity conservation.波动不对称性和羽毛生长纹作为生物标志物,用于评估遮荫咖啡种植园的栖息地质量以保护鸟类多样性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Aug 14;6(8):190013. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190013. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
Targeted habitat restoration can reduce extinction rates in fragmented forests.目标性生境恢复可以降低森林破碎化导致的物种灭绝速率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):9635-9640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705834114. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Jun;28(6):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
4
Associations of forest cover, fragment area, and connectivity with neotropical understory bird species richness and abundance.森林覆盖、片段面积和连通性与新热带林下鸟类物种丰富度和丰度的关联。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Dec;26(6):1100-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01940.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
5
Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes.超越片段化阈值假说:破碎景观中生物多样性的状态转换。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 27;5(10):e13666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013666.
6
Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation.灭绝债务:生物多样性保护面临的一项挑战。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Oct;24(10):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
7
Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species.最小可行集合种群规模、灭绝债务与一个衰退物种的保护
Ecol Appl. 2007 Jul;17(5):1460-73. doi: 10.1890/06-1032.1.
8
Species richness changes lag behind climate change.物种丰富度变化滞后于气候变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 22;273(1593):1465-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3484.
9
Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments.亚马逊森林碎片的物种丧失率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):14069-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2336195100. Epub 2003 Nov 12.
10
Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments.食虫鸟类从热带森林碎片中消失。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):263-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012616199.