Uezu Alexandre, Metzger Jean Paul
Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas, Nazaré Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147909. eCollection 2016.
There are few opportunities to evaluate the relative importance of landscape structure and dynamics upon biodiversity, especially in highly fragmented tropical landscapes. Conservation strategies and species risk evaluations often rely exclusively on current aspects of landscape structure, although such limited assumptions are known to be misleading when time-lag responses occur. By relating bird functional-group richness to forest patch size and isolation in ten-year intervals (1956, 1965, 1978, 1984, 1993 and 2003), we revealed that birds with different sensitivity to fragmentation display contrasting responses to landscape dynamics in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For non-sensitive groups, there was no time-lag in response: the recent degree of isolation best explains their variation in richness, which likely relates to these species' flexibility to adapt to changes in landscape structure. However, for sensitive bird groups, the 1978 patch area was the best explanatory variable, providing evidence for a 25-year time-lag in response to habitat reduction. Time-lag was more likely in landscapes that encompass large patches, which can support temporarily the presence of some sensitive species, even when habitat cover is relatively low. These landscapes potentially support the most threatened populations and should be priorities for restoration efforts to avoid further species loss. Although time-lags provide an opportunity to counteract the negative consequences of fragmentation, it also reinforces the urgency of restoration actions. Fragmented landscapes will be depleted of biodiversity if landscape structure is only maintained, and not improved. The urgency of restoration action may be even higher in landscapes where habitat loss and fragmentation history is older and where no large fragment remained to act temporarily as a refuge.
评估景观结构和动态变化对生物多样性的相对重要性的机会很少,尤其是在高度破碎化的热带景观中。保护策略和物种风险评估通常仅依赖于景观结构的当前状况,尽管已知当出现时间滞后效应时,这种有限的假设会产生误导。通过将鸟类功能群丰富度与森林斑块大小和隔离度以十年为间隔(1956年、1965年、1978年、1984年、1993年和2003年)进行关联,我们发现,对破碎化敏感度不同的鸟类对巴西大西洋森林景观动态变化呈现出不同的响应。对于不敏感的鸟类群体,响应不存在时间滞后:近期的隔离程度最能解释它们丰富度的变化,这可能与这些物种适应景观结构变化的灵活性有关。然而,对于敏感的鸟类群体,1978年的斑块面积是最佳解释变量,这为响应栖息地减少存在25年的时间滞后提供了证据。在包含大片斑块的景观中,时间滞后效应更有可能出现,即使栖息地覆盖率相对较低,大片斑块也能暂时支持一些敏感物种的生存。这些景观可能支撑着最受威胁的种群,应成为恢复工作的重点,以避免进一步的物种丧失。尽管时间滞后效应为抵消破碎化的负面影响提供了机会,但它也强化了恢复行动的紧迫性。如果仅维持而非改善景观结构,破碎化的景观将丧失生物多样性。在栖息地丧失和破碎化历史较长且没有大片斑块可作为临时避难所的景观中,恢复行动的紧迫性可能更高。