• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞拉多森林景观中栖息地丧失对蝙蝠丰富度的阈值效应。

Threshold effect of habitat loss on bat richness in cerrado-forest landscapes.

作者信息

Muylaert Renata L, Stevens Richard D, Ribeiro Milton C

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 24A Av., 1515, 13506-900, Rio Claro, Brazil.

Department of Natural Resources Management, Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, 79409, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2016 Sep;26(6):1854-1867. doi: 10.1890/15-1757.1.

DOI:10.1890/15-1757.1
PMID:27755693
Abstract

Understanding how animal groups respond to contemporary habitat loss and fragmentation is essential for development of strategies for species conservation. Until now, there has been no consensus about how landscape degradation affects the diversity and distribution of Neotropical bats. Some studies demonstrate population declines and species loss in impacted areas, although the magnitude and generality of these effects on bat community structure are unclear. Empirical fragmentation thresholds predict an accentuated drop in biodiversity, and species richness in particular, when less than 30% of the original amount of habitat in the landscape remains. In this study, we tested whether bat species richness demonstrates this threshold response, based on 48 sites distributed across 12 landscapes with 9-88% remaining forest in Brazilian cerrado-forest formations. We also examined the degree to which abundance was similarly affected within four different feeding guilds. The threshold value for richness, below which bat diversity declines precipitously, was estimated at 47% of remaining forest. To verify if the response of bat abundance to habitat loss differed among feeding guilds, we used a model selection approach based on Akaike's information criterion. Models accounted for the amount of riparian forest, semideciduous forest, cerrado, tree plantations, secondary forest, and the total amount of forest in the landscape. We demonstrate a nonlinear effect of the contribution of tree plantations to frugivores, and a positive effect of the amount of cerrado to nectarivores and animalivores, the groups that responded most to decreases in amount of forest. We suggest that bat assemblages in interior Atlantic Forest and cerrado regions of southeastern Brazil are impoverished, since we found lower richness and abundance of different groups in landscapes with lower amounts of forest. The relatively higher threshold value of 47% suggests that bat communities have a relatively lower resistance to habitat degradation than other animal groups. Accordingly, conservation and restoration strategies should focus on increasing the amount of native vegetation of landscapes so as to enhance species richness of bats.

摘要

了解动物群体如何应对当代栖息地丧失和破碎化对于制定物种保护策略至关重要。到目前为止,关于景观退化如何影响新热带蝙蝠的多样性和分布尚未达成共识。一些研究表明,受影响地区的蝙蝠种群数量下降和物种丧失,尽管这些影响对蝙蝠群落结构的程度和普遍性尚不清楚。经验性破碎阈值预测,当景观中剩余的栖息地面积不到原始面积的30%时,生物多样性将急剧下降,尤其是物种丰富度。在本研究中,我们基于分布在巴西塞拉多 - 森林地貌的12个景观中的48个地点进行测试,这些景观中剩余森林比例为9% - 88%,以检验蝙蝠物种丰富度是否表现出这种阈值响应。我们还研究了四种不同食性类群内蝙蝠数量受影响的程度。蝙蝠多样性急剧下降的丰富度阈值估计为剩余森林的47%。为了验证蝙蝠数量对栖息地丧失的响应在不同食性类群之间是否存在差异,我们使用了基于赤池信息准则的模型选择方法。模型考虑了河岸森林、半落叶林、塞拉多、人工林、次生林以及景观中森林的总量。我们证明了人工林对食果蝙蝠的贡献具有非线性效应,塞拉多面积对食蜜蝙蝠和食虫蝙蝠具有积极效应,这两类蝙蝠对森林面积减少的响应最为明显。我们认为巴西东南部内陆大西洋森林和塞拉多地区的蝙蝠群落数量减少,因为我们发现在森林面积较少的景观中,不同类群的丰富度和数量较低。相对较高的47%阈值表明,蝙蝠群落对栖息地退化的抵抗力相对低于其他动物群体。因此,保护和恢复策略应侧重于增加景观中的原生植被数量,以提高蝙蝠的物种丰富度。

相似文献

1
Threshold effect of habitat loss on bat richness in cerrado-forest landscapes.塞拉多森林景观中栖息地丧失对蝙蝠丰富度的阈值效应。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Sep;26(6):1854-1867. doi: 10.1890/15-1757.1.
2
Associations of forest cover, fragment area, and connectivity with neotropical understory bird species richness and abundance.森林覆盖、片段面积和连通性与新热带林下鸟类物种丰富度和丰度的关联。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Dec;26(6):1100-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01940.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
3
Functional decay in tree community within tropical fragmented landscapes: Effects of landscape-scale forest cover.热带破碎化景观中树木群落的功能衰退:景观尺度森林覆盖的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 12;12(4):e0175545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175545. eCollection 2017.
4
[Effects of landscape and vegetation structure on the diversity of phyllostomid bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in Oaxaca, Mexico].[景观和植被结构对墨西哥瓦哈卡叶口蝠(翼手目:叶口蝠科)多样性的影响]
Rev Biol Trop. 2014 Mar;62(1):217-39.
5
Bat assemblages in conservation areas of a metropolitan region in Southeastern Brazil, including an important karst habitat.巴西东南部一个大都市地区保护区内的蝙蝠群落,包括一个重要的喀斯特栖息地。
Braz J Biol. 2013 May;73(2):309-19. doi: 10.1590/S1519-69842013000200011.
6
Deforestation Impacts on Bat Functional Diversity in Tropical Landscapes.森林砍伐对热带景观中蝙蝠功能多样性的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 7;11(12):e0166765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166765. eCollection 2016.
7
Bat and bird diversity along independent gradients of latitude and tree composition in European forests.欧洲森林中蝙蝠和鸟类多样性与纬度及树木组成的独立梯度关系
Oecologia. 2016 Oct;182(2):529-37. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3671-9. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree cover in agricultural landscapes.农业景观中不同形式树木覆盖下的动物多样性模式。
Ecol Appl. 2006 Oct;16(5):1986-99. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1986:poadid]2.0.co;2.
9
Birds in Anthropogenic Landscapes: The Responses of Ecological Groups to Forest Loss in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.人为景观中的鸟类:巴西大西洋森林生态群落对森林丧失的响应
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0128923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128923. eCollection 2015.
10
Species mobility and landscape context determine the importance of local and landscape-level attributes.物种的移动性和景观背景决定了局部和景观水平属性的重要性。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Jul;27(5):1541-1554. doi: 10.1002/eap.1546. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative Perception of Bats, Exacerbated by the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic, May Hinder Bat Conservation in Northern Uganda.对蝙蝠的负面认知,因新冠疫情而加剧,可能会阻碍乌干达北部的蝙蝠保护工作。
Sustainability. 2022 Dec 2;14(24). doi: 10.3390/su142416924. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
2
Landscape Composition and Forest Structure Shape Phyllostomid Bat Assemblages in the Atlantic Forest Remnants.景观构成与森林结构塑造大西洋森林遗迹中的叶口蝠群落。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;15(14):2082. doi: 10.3390/ani15142082.
3
Rabies Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies in Free-Ranging Invasive Wild Boars () from Brazil.
巴西野生入侵野猪体内的狂犬病毒中和抗体
Pathogens. 2024 Apr 7;13(4):303. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13040303.
4
Species richness response to human pressure hides important assemblage transformations.物种丰富度对人类压力的响应掩盖了重要的组合转变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 10;119(19):e2107361119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107361119. Epub 2022 May 2.
5
Modularity and specialization in bat-fly interaction networks are remarkably consistent across patches within urbanized landscapes and spatial scales.在城市化景观和空间尺度内的斑块之间,蝙蝠与蝇类相互作用网络的模块化和专业化程度非常一致。
Curr Zool. 2020 Dec 13;67(4):403-410. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoaa072. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Movement syndromes of a Neotropical frugivorous bat inhabiting heterogeneous landscapes in Brazil.栖息于巴西异质景观中的一种新热带食果蝙蝠的运动综合征。
Mov Ecol. 2021 Jul 7;9(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40462-021-00266-6.
7
Anthropogenic Disturbances Eroding the Genetic Diversity of a Threatened Palm Tree: A Multiscale Approach.人为干扰侵蚀受威胁棕榈树的遗传多样性:一种多尺度方法。
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 7;10:1090. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01090. eCollection 2019.
8
Spatial patterns of medium and large size mammal assemblages in várzea and terra firme forests, Central Amazonia, Brazil.巴西亚马逊中部的瓦尔德泽亚和特立尼达森林中大中型哺乳动物组合的空间格局。
PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0198120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198120. eCollection 2018.
9
Conserving relics from ancient underground worlds: assessing the influence of cave and landscape features on obligate iron cave dwellers from the Eastern Amazon.保护古代地下世界的遗迹:评估洞穴和景观特征对来自亚马逊东部专性铁洞穴居民的影响。
PeerJ. 2018 Mar 20;6:e4531. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4531. eCollection 2018.
10
Warning signals of biodiversity collapse across gradients of tropical forest loss.警告信号:热带森林丧失梯度下生物多样性的崩溃。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):1622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19985-9.