Cai Tongjian, Luo Wenjing, Ruan Diyun, Wu Yi-Jun, Fox Donald A, Chen Jingyuan
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Hazard Assessment and Control in Special Operational Environment, School of Public Health, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Jun;124(6):722-32. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409566. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
Rapid economic development in China has produced serious ecological, environmental, and health problems. Neurotoxicity has been recognized as a major public health problem. The Chinese government, research institutes, and scientists conducted extensive studies concerning the source, characteristics, and mechanisms of neurotoxicants.
This paper presents, for the first time, a comprehensive history and review of major sources of neurotoxicants, national bodies/legislation engaged, and major neurotoxicology research in China.
Peer-reviewed research and pollution studies by Chinese scientists from 1991 to 2015 were examined. PubMed, Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were the major search tools.
The central problem is an increased exposure to neurotoxicants from air and water, food contamination, e-waste recycling, and manufacturing of household products. China formulated an institutional framework and standards system for management of major neurotoxicants. Basic and applied research was initiated, and international cooperation was achieved. The annual number of peer-reviewed neurotoxicology papers from Chinese authors increased almost 30-fold since 2001.
Despite extensive efforts, neurotoxicity remains a significant public health problem. This provides great challenges and opportunities. We identified 10 significant areas that require major educational, environmental, governmental, and research efforts, as well as attention to public awareness. For example, there is a need to increase efforts to utilize new in vivo and in vitro models, determine the potential neurotoxicity and mechanisms involved in newly emerging pollutants, and examine the effects and mechanisms of mixtures. In the future, we anticipate working with scientists worldwide to accomplish these goals and eliminate, prevent and treat neurotoxicity.
Cai T, Luo W, Ruan D, Wu YJ, Fox DA, Chen J. 2016. The history, status, gaps, and future directions of neurotoxicology in China. Environ Health Perspect 124:722-732; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409566.
中国经济的快速发展带来了严重的生态、环境和健康问题。神经毒性已被公认为一个主要的公共卫生问题。中国政府、研究机构和科学家针对神经毒物的来源、特性及作用机制开展了广泛研究。
本文首次全面介绍了中国神经毒物的主要来源、相关国家机构/法规以及主要神经毒理学研究的历史并进行综述。
对1991年至2015年期间中国科学家发表的同行评议研究和污染研究进行了审查。主要检索工具为PubMed、科学网和中国知网。
核心问题是空气、水、食品污染、电子垃圾回收及家用产品制造导致的神经毒物暴露增加。中国制定了主要神经毒物管理的制度框架和标准体系。开展了基础和应用研究,并实现了国际合作。自2001年以来,中国作者发表的同行评议神经毒理学论文数量每年增长近30倍。
尽管付出了巨大努力,神经毒性仍是一个重大的公共卫生问题。这带来了巨大挑战和机遇。我们确定了10个需要在教育、环境、政府和研究方面付出重大努力以及提高公众意识的重要领域。例如,需要加大力度利用新的体内和体外模型,确定新出现污染物的潜在神经毒性及相关机制,并研究混合物的影响和机制。未来,我们期望与全球科学家合作实现这些目标,消除、预防和治疗神经毒性。
蔡涛,罗文,阮迪,吴亚军,福克斯·达纳,陈静。2016年。中国神经毒理学的历史、现状、差距及未来方向。《环境健康展望》124:722 - 732;http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409566 。