• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盆底功能障碍疾病登记处:目的与发展

The Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry: Purpose and Development.

作者信息

Bradley Catherine S, Visco Anthony G, Weber LeBrun Emily E, Barber Matthew D

机构信息

From the *Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; †Duke University, Durham, NC; ‡University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and §Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000254.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000254
PMID:26829344
Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem that negatively impacts women's quality of life. A variety of surgeries exist for POP treatment, including procedures performed with and without mesh augmentation. The growing use of mesh in prolapse surgeries in the 2000s was associated with increasing reports of complications, resulting in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Safety Notifications, and in 2012, the FDA ordered transvaginal mesh manufacturers to conduct prospective studies to evaluate longer-term outcomes. These requirements provided incentives and an environment conducive to collaboration. American Urogynecologic Society leaders collaborated with device manufacturers, the FDA, and other professional organizations to establish the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry (PFDR), a collection of interrelated registries, which could meet manufacturers' needs but also allow surgeons to track individual and aggregate outcomes for quality improvement. The PFDR was developed and launched by American Urogynecologic Society with objectives of (1) collecting, storing, and analyzing clinical data related to POP treatment; (2) establishing common data elements and quality metrics; and (3) providing a framework for external stakeholders to conduct POP research. The PFDR includes industry-sponsored studies, as well as 2 options for volunteer registry participation, the PFDR-Quality Improvement and PFDR-Research. The PFDR promotes quality improvement and national benchmarking and will provide real-world comparative safety and effectiveness data for prolapse surgeries. The PFDR can serve as a model for collaboration between medical practitioners, researchers, industry, and federal agencies and may allow progress toward our similar goal of high-quality surgical care of women with prolapse.

摘要

盆腔器官脱垂(POP)是一个常见问题,会对女性的生活质量产生负面影响。针对POP的治疗有多种手术方式,包括使用和不使用网片增强的手术。21世纪,网片在脱垂手术中的使用日益增加,与此同时并发症报告也越来越多,这导致美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布了安全通知。2012年,FDA命令经阴道网片制造商开展前瞻性研究,以评估长期结果。这些要求提供了激励措施,并营造了有利于合作的环境。美国妇科泌尿学会的领导人与设备制造商、FDA及其他专业组织合作,建立了盆底功能障碍登记处(PFDR),这是一个相互关联的登记处集合,既能满足制造商的需求,又能让外科医生追踪个体和总体结果以改进质量。PFDR由美国妇科泌尿学会开发并推出,其目标包括:(1)收集、存储和分析与POP治疗相关的临床数据;(2)建立通用数据元素和质量指标;(3)为外部利益相关者开展POP研究提供框架。PFDR包括行业赞助的研究,以及志愿者登记参与的两种选择,即PFDR质量改进和PFDR研究。PFDR促进质量改进和全国基准化,并将为脱垂手术提供真实世界的比较安全性和有效性数据。PFDR可以作为医生、研究人员、行业和联邦机构之间合作的典范,并可能有助于我们朝着为脱垂女性提供高质量手术护理的类似目标取得进展。

相似文献

1
The Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry: Purpose and Development.盆底功能障碍疾病登记处:目的与发展
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000254.
2
Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry: Study Design and Outcome Measures.盆底功能障碍疾病登记处:研究设计与结果测量
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):70-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000237.
3
Restriction of Surgical Options for Pelvic Floor Disorders.限制盆底功能障碍的手术选择。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 May 1;30(5):467-475. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001507. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
Registries as Tools for Clinical Excellence and the Development of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry.作为实现卓越临床及盆底功能障碍疾病注册系统发展工具的注册系统。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016 Mar;43(1):121-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.006.
5
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in Academic Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Urology Practice in the Setting of the Food and Drug Administration Public Health Notifications.在食品药品监督管理局发布公共卫生通知的背景下,学术性女性盆底医学与重建外科泌尿外科实践中的盆腔器官脱垂手术
Urology. 2016 May;91:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.057. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].[三种手术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的比较结果及生殖器脱垂复发危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100.
7
Prospective study of transobturator mesh kit (Prolift™) in pelvic reconstructive surgery with vaginal hysterectomy after 3 years' follow-up.经阴道子宫切除术后 3 年随访的经闭孔网片吊带(普罗力®)在盆底重建手术中的前瞻性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Aug;288(2):355-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2713-3. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
8
Clinical epidemiological studies of women undergoing surgery for urogynaecological disorders.接受泌尿妇科疾病手术治疗的女性的临床流行病学研究。
Dan Med J. 2015 Oct;62(10):B5154.
9
One-year outcome of concurrent anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh surgery for treatment of advanced urogenital prolapse: case series.同期经阴道前路和后路网片手术治疗中重度女性泌尿生殖系统脱垂的 1 年疗效:病例系列。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 May 23.
10
Transvaginal mesh: a historical review and update of the current state of affairs in the United States.经阴道网片:美国的历史回顾与当前状况更新
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Apr;28(4):527-535. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3092-7. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic organ prolapse procedures.女性盆腔器官脱垂手术后患者报告结局测量的评估和可接受性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09540-2.
2
Evaluation of the acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures.评估女性盆底手术后患者报告结局测量的可接受性。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2213-2221. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03099-x. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Long-term active surveillance of implantable medical devices: an analysis of factors determining whether current registries are adequate to expose safety and efficacy problems.
植入式医疗设备的长期主动监测:对决定当前注册系统是否足以揭示安全性和有效性问题的因素的分析。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019 Jul 3;1(1):e000011. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000011. eCollection 2019.
4
Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.盆底重建术后网片并发症中的宿主-生物材料相互作用
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Dec;18(12):725-738. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00511-y. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Generic Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Seeking Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.寻求盆腔器官脱垂治疗的患者的一般健康相关生活质量。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;27(6):337-343. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001069.
6
Outcomes collected in female pelvic floor surgical procedure registries and databases: a scoping review.女性盆底外科手术登记和数据库中收集的结果:范围综述。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec;32(12):3113-3130. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04839-2. Epub 2021 May 26.
7
Landscape of Cardiovascular Device Registries in the United States.美国心血管设备注册研究现状
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jun 4;8(11):e012756. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012756. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
8
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Pelvic Floor Disorders.盆底功能障碍患者报告结局量表
Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Mar 27;20(5):22. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0888-2.
9
An evaluation of the Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience database that inspired the United States Food and Drug Administration's Reclassification of transvaginal mesh.评估制造商和用户设施设备体验数据库,该数据库启发了美国食品和药物管理局对阴道网片的重新分类。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Mar;59(2):126-132. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.2.126. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
10
Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process.经阴道网状装置治疗盆腔器官脱垂的试验:美国食品药品监督管理局批准过程的系统数据库回顾
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 6;7(12):e017125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017125.