Suppr超能文献

庆大霉素用于社区环境中治疗新生儿败血症的可行性和疗效:一项系统评价

Feasibility and efficacy of gentamicin for treating neonatal sepsis in community-based settings: a systematic review.

作者信息

Jaiswal Nishant, Singh Meenu, Kondel Ritika, Kaur Navjot, Thumburu Kiran K, Kumar Ajay, Kaur Harpreet, Chadha Neelima, Gupta Neeraj, Agarwal Amit, Malhotra Samir, Shafiq Nusrat

机构信息

ICMR Advanced Centre for Evidence Based Child Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

World J Pediatr. 2016 Nov;12(4):408-414. doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0005-2. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of neonatal deaths in developing countries. The current recommended in-hospital treatment is parenteral ampicillin (or penicillin) and gentamicin in young infants for 10- 14 days; however, very few could access and afford. The current review is to evaluate the feasibility of gentamicin in community based settings.

METHODS

Both observational and randomized controlled trials were included. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Central Trial Register of India were searched until September 2013. We assessed the risk of bias by Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool.

RESULTS

Two observational studies indicated feasibility ensuring coverage of population, decrease in case fatality rate in the group treated by community health workers. In an RCT, no significant difference was observed in the treatment failure rates [odds ratio (OR)=0.88], and the mortality in the first and second week (OR=1.53; OR=2.24) between gentamicin and ceftriaxone groups. Within the gentamicin group, the combination of penicillin and gentamicin showed a lower rate of treatment failure (OR=0.44) and mortality at second week of life (OR=0.17) as compared to the combination of gentamicin and oral cotrimoxazole.

CONCLUSION

Gentamicin for the treatment of neonatal sepsis is both feasible and effective in community-based settings and can be used as an alternative to the hospitalbased care in resource compromised settings. But there was less evidence in the management of neonatal sepsis in hospitals as was seen in this review in which we included only one RCT and three observational studies.

摘要

背景

新生儿败血症是发展中国家新生儿死亡的主要原因。目前推荐的住院治疗方案是对幼儿采用胃肠外注射氨苄西林(或青霉素)和庆大霉素,疗程为10 - 14天;然而,很少有人能够获得并负担得起这种治疗。本综述旨在评估庆大霉素在社区环境中的可行性。

方法

纳入观察性研究和随机对照试验。检索了截至2013年9月的Medline、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和印度中央试验注册库。我们使用Cochrane协作网的“偏倚风险”工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

两项观察性研究表明,在社区卫生工作者治疗的人群中,庆大霉素在确保人群覆盖、降低病死率方面具有可行性。在一项随机对照试验中,庆大霉素组和头孢曲松组在治疗失败率[比值比(OR)=0.88]以及第一周和第二周的死亡率(OR = 1.53;OR = 2.24)方面未观察到显著差异。在庆大霉素组中,与庆大霉素和口服复方新诺明联合使用相比,青霉素和庆大霉素联合使用的治疗失败率(OR = 0.44)和出生后第二周的死亡率(OR = 0.17)更低。

结论

在社区环境中,庆大霉素治疗新生儿败血症既可行又有效,在资源有限的环境中可作为住院治疗的替代方案。但正如本综述所见,在医院管理新生儿败血症方面的证据较少,本综述仅纳入了一项随机对照试验和三项观察性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验