Gu Guizhen, Yu Shanfa, Zhou Wenhui, Chen Guoshun, Wu Hui
Henan Provincial Institute for Occupational Health, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;33(10):738-42.
To explore depressive symptoms and influencing factors in employees from 13 enterprises.
A total of 6711 workers from 13 enterprises were investigated by cluster sampling, and data were collected anonymously between November 2008 and June 2009. Job satisfaction, occupational stressors, strains, coping strategy, and social support were measured using occupational stress instruments, job content questionnaire, and effort-reward imbalance questionnaire.
Median and P25P75 values of depression score were 14 and 921, respectively. The depression score of male workers (16.31 ± 10.12) was significantly higher than that of female workers(14.50 ± 9.08) (Z=4.09, P<0.01). The depression score of managers was lowest (12.89 ± 8.70), and the front-line workers scored highest (16.02 ± 9.94), with a significant difference between the two groups (χ² =9.90, P<0.01). The depression score of shift workers (16.79 ± 9.974) was significantly higher than that of non-shift workers (14.81 ± 9.63) (Z=53.43, P<0.01). The depression scores of workers with weekly job times of ≤ 40 h, ~50 h, ~59 h, and ≥ 60 h were (14.70 ± 9.94), (15.76 ± 9.84), (15.46 ± 9.91), and (19.70 ± 10.67), respectively (χ² = 31.79, P <0.01). Correlation analysis revealed that depression score was negatively correlated with the scores of job control (r=-0.236, P <0.01), reward (r=-0.443, P<0.01), job satisfaction (r=-0.418, P<0.01), positive affectivity (r=-0.307, P <0.01), superior support (r=-0.287, P<0.01), colleague support (r=-0.235, P<0.01), and coping strategy (r=-0.208, P<0.01), but positively correlated with the scores of external effort (r=0.225, P<0.01), inherent effort (r=0.248, P<0.01), psychological demands (r = 0.246, P <0.01), physical demands (r=0.246, P<0.01), and negative affectivity (r=0.525, P<0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of depressive symptoms in workers with high negative affectivity was about four times as high as that in workers with low negative affectivity. The risks of depressive symptoms in workers with low reward, having disease in the past six months, and with high inherent effort were 1.62, 1.50, and 1.48 times, respectively, as high as those for their counterparts.
Occupational stress, individual factors, health status, and shift work affect the depressive symptoms of workers. Reducing negative affectivity and increasing rewards are main measures to relieve depressive symptoms.
探讨13家企业员工的抑郁症状及影响因素。
采用整群抽样法对13家企业的6711名工人进行调查,于2008年11月至2009年6月期间匿名收集数据。使用职业压力量表、工作内容问卷和付出-回报失衡问卷对工作满意度、职业压力源、压力反应、应对策略和社会支持进行测量。
抑郁得分的中位数及P25P75值分别为14和921。男性工人的抑郁得分(16.31±10.12)显著高于女性工人(14.50±9.08)(Z=4.09,P<0.01)。管理人员的抑郁得分最低(12.89±8.70),一线工人得分最高(16.02±9.94),两组间差异有统计学意义(χ²=9.90,P<0.01)。倒班工人的抑郁得分(16.79±9.974)显著高于非倒班工人(14.81±9.63)(Z=53.43,P<0.01)。每周工作时间≤40小时、50小时、59小时和≥60小时的工人抑郁得分分别为(14.70±9.94)、(15.76±9.84)、(15.46±9.91)和(19.70±10.67)(χ²=31.79,P<0.01)。相关分析显示,抑郁得分与工作控制得分(r=-0.236,P<0.01)、回报得分(r=-0.443,P<0.01)、工作满意度得分(r=-0.418,P<0.01)、积极情感得分(r=-0.307,P<0.01)、上级支持得分(r=-0.287,P<0.01)、同事支持得分(r=-0.235,P<0.01)和应对策略得分(r=-0.208,P<0.01)呈负相关,但与外部付出得分(r=0.225,P<0.01)、内在付出得分(r=0.248,P<0.01)、心理需求得分(r=0.246,P<0.01)、生理需求得分(r=0.246,P<0.01)和消极情感得分(r=0.525,P<0.01)呈正相关。多因素logistic回归分析显示,消极情感高的工人出现抑郁症状的风险约为消极情感低的工人的4倍。回报低、过去6个月内患病和内在付出高的工人出现抑郁症状的风险分别是相应人群的1.62倍、1.50倍和1.48倍。
职业压力、个体因素、健康状况及倒班工作影响工人的抑郁症状。降低消极情感和增加回报是缓解抑郁症状的主要措施。