• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于医疗助理的小基层医疗实践中高危患者的护理管理:一项集群随机临床试验。

Medical Assistant-Based Care Management for High-Risk Patients in Small Primary Care Practices: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 1;164(5):323-30. doi: 10.7326/M14-2403. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

DOI:10.7326/M14-2403
PMID:26833209
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple chronic conditions are at high risk for potentially avoidable hospitalizations, which may be reduced by care coordination and self-management support. Medical assistants are an increasingly available resource for patient care in primary care practices.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether protocol-based care management delivered by medical assistants improves care in patients at high risk for future hospitalization in primary care.

DESIGN

Two-year cluster randomized clinical trial. (Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN56104508).

SETTING

115 primary care practices in Germany.

PATIENTS

2076 patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or chronic heart failure and a likelihood of hospitalization in the upper quartile of the population, as predicted by an analysis of insurance data.

INTERVENTION

Protocol-based care management, including structured assessment, action planning, and monitoring delivered by medical assistants, compared with usual care.

MEASUREMENTS

All-cause hospitalizations at 12 months (primary outcome) and quality-of-life scores (12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12] and EuroQol instrument [EQ-5D]).

RESULTS

Included patients had an average of 4 co-occurring chronic conditions. All-cause hospitalizations did not differ between groups at 12 months (risk ratio [RR], 1.01 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.18]) and 24 months (RR, 0.98 [CI, 0.85 to 1.12]). Quality of life (differences, 1.16 [CI, 0.24 to 2.08] on SF-12 physical component and 1.68 [CI, 0.60 to 2.77] on SF-12 mental component) and general health (difference on EQ-5D, 0.03 [CI, 0.00 to 0.05]) improved significantly at 24 months. Intervention costs totaled $10 per patient per month.

LIMITATION

Small number of primary care practices and low intensity of intervention.

CONCLUSION

This low-intensity intervention did not reduce all-cause hospitalizations but showed positive effects on quality of life at reasonable costs in high-risk multimorbid patients.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

AOK Baden-Württemberg and AOK Bundesverband.

摘要

背景

患有多种慢性病的患者存在潜在可避免住院的高风险,通过护理协调和自我管理支持可能会降低这种风险。医疗助理是初级保健实践中患者护理的日益可用资源。

目的

确定由医疗助理提供的基于协议的护理管理是否可以改善高风险患者未来在初级保健中的护理。

设计

为期两年的群组随机临床试验。(当前对照试验:ISRCTN56104508)。

设置

德国 115 个初级保健诊所。

患者

2076 名患有 2 型糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或慢性心力衰竭的患者,以及根据保险数据分析预测的住院可能性处于人口上四分位数的患者。

干预措施

基于协议的护理管理,包括由医疗助理提供的结构化评估、行动计划和监测,与常规护理相比。

测量

12 个月时的全因住院率(主要结局)和生活质量评分(12 项短表单健康调查 [SF-12] 和欧洲五维健康量表 [EQ-5D])。

结果

纳入的患者平均有 4 种共病。12 个月和 24 个月时,全因住院率在两组之间没有差异(风险比 [RR],1.01 [95%CI,0.87 至 1.18])和 24 个月(RR,0.98 [CI,0.85 至 1.12])。生活质量(差异,SF-12 生理成分上为 1.16 [CI,0.24 至 2.08],SF-12 心理成分上为 1.68 [CI,0.60 至 2.77])和一般健康(EQ-5D 上的差异,0.03 [CI,0.00 至 0.05])在 24 个月时显著改善。干预成本为每位患者每月 10 美元。

局限性

初级保健实践数量少,干预强度低。

结论

这种低强度干预措施并未降低全因住院率,但在高风险多种慢性病患者中以合理的成本显示出对生活质量的积极影响。

主要资金来源

AOK Baden-Württemberg 和 AOK Bundesverband。

相似文献

1
Medical Assistant-Based Care Management for High-Risk Patients in Small Primary Care Practices: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于医疗助理的小基层医疗实践中高危患者的护理管理:一项集群随机临床试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 1;164(5):323-30. doi: 10.7326/M14-2403. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
2
Primary care practice-based care management for chronically ill patients (PraCMan): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN56104508].基层医疗实践为基础的慢性病患者管理(PraCMan):一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案 [ISRCTN56104508]。
Trials. 2011 Jun 29;12:163. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-163.
3
Evaluating a collaborative smoking cessation intervention in primary care (ENTER): study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.评估初级保健中的协作戒烟干预措施(ENTER):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Oct 9;16:447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0977-6.
4
A comprehensive care management program to prevent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalizations: a randomized, controlled trial.一项预防慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院的综合护理管理计划:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):673-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00003.
5
Diabetes Care Protocol: effects on patient-important outcomes. A cluster randomized, non-inferiority trial in primary care.糖尿病护理方案:对患者重要结局的影响。初级保健中的一项集群随机、非劣效性试验。
Diabet Med. 2010 Apr;27(4):442-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02968.x.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Rev Med Suisse. 2016 Apr 13;12(514):765.
7
A self-management approach using self-initiated action plans for symptoms with ongoing nurse support in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and comorbidities: the COPE-III study protocol.一种自我管理方法,在持续的护士支持下,让慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和合并症患者使用自我启动的行动计划来处理症状:COPE-III 研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool in patients with asthma, COPD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and heart failure: A pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental study in the Netherlands.评估慢性疾病负担(ABCC)工具在哮喘、COPD、2 型糖尿病和心力衰竭患者中的有效性:荷兰一项实用的聚类准实验研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2343364. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2343364. Epub 2024 May 13.
9
Hospital cost effect of a heart failure disease management program: the Specialized Primary and Networked Care in Heart Failure (SPAN-CHF) trial.心力衰竭疾病管理项目的医院成本效益:心力衰竭专科初级和网络护理(SPAN-CHF)试验
Am Heart J. 2006 May;151(5):1013-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.06.039.
10
Patterns of multimorbidity in primary care patients at high risk of future hospitalization.初级保健中未来有住院高风险患者的多病共存模式。
Popul Health Manag. 2012 Apr;15(2):119-24. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0026. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and economic outcomes of multidisciplinary team members in primary care: a scoping review.基层医疗中多学科团队成员的临床和经济成果:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 5;25(1):1025. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13243-1.
2
Breaking the chains in plato's cave: acute care in general practice.打破柏拉图洞穴中的枷锁:全科医疗中的急症护理
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jun 9;26(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02901-2.
3
Exploring Physician and Patient Perspectives on Expectations and Role Models Towards Chronic Pain Treatment in General Practice: A Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study.
探索全科医疗中医生和患者对慢性疼痛治疗的期望及榜样的看法:一项定性横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 18;13(2):187. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020187.
4
Strengthening crisis resilience in German primary care by using quality indicators: findings of a process evaluation in the RESILARE project.通过使用质量指标增强德国初级保健的危机恢复力:RESILARE项目的过程评估结果
Arch Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;82(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01400-7.
5
Development of the China's list of ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs): a study protocol.中国门诊医疗敏感条件(ACSCs)清单的制定:一项研究方案。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Mar 19;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00350-5.
6
[Effectiveness of the clinical assistant in the control of hypertensive and diabetic patients in primary care].[临床助手在基层医疗中对高血压和糖尿病患者的管理效果]
Aten Primaria. 2024 Jun;56(6):102853. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102853. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Efficacy of sustained knowledge translation (KT) interventions in chronic disease management in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of complex interventions.持续性知识转化(KT)干预措施在老年人慢性病管理中的效果:复杂干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Jul 24;21(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02966-9.
8
Optimizing Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in German Primary Care: Results of the Regional Intervention Study CHANGE-3 and the Nested cRCT.优化德国初级医疗中急性呼吸道感染的抗生素处方:区域干预研究CHANGE-3及嵌套式随机对照试验的结果
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 4;12(5):850. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050850.
9
Primary care team and its association with quality of care for people with multimorbidity: a systematic review.基层医疗团队及其与多病共存患者护理质量的关联:系统评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 19;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01968-z.
10
The Association of Teamlets and Teams with Physician Burnout and Patient Outcomes.团队和团队成员与医生倦怠和患者结局的关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1384-1392. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07894-7. Epub 2022 Nov 28.