Poß-Doering Regina, Koetsenruijter Jan, Litke Nicola Alexandra, Weis Aline, Köppen Martina, Kümmel Stephanie, Szecsenyi Joachim, Wensing Michel
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, University Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Section for Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arch Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;82(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01400-7.
In recent years, health systems worldwide have been confronted with several crises such as natural disasters or the COVID-19 pandemic, that affected lives and health of many people. In light of waves of infections and heat, climate change is considered to be the biggest health threat of the 21st century. Strengthening individual and organizational crisis resilience in healthcare settings thus becomes a crucial factor in maintaining care quality and protecting vulnerable patients during such crises. The RESILARE project therefore aimed to develop and evaluate quality indicators that support primary care practices in preparing for and adapting to crisis-related challenges.
In a three-phased process, indicator development was based on systematic literature research and qualitative data, a two-stage expert panel process, and pilot testing in a maximum of n = 35 ambulatory practices during an outreach visit. Practice-individual indicator-related status and benchmarking information were provided via feedback reports to complete the audit and feedback program. A mixed-methods process evaluation used semistructured interviews with participating General practitioners and nonphysician health professionals to explore support and challenges for the implementation of the derived set of quality indicators. Two online surveys were conducted to evaluate all indicators and the two-part feedback report. Qualitative data were analyzed inductively using a thematic analysis approach. Survey data were analyzed descriptively.
A total of n = 32 indicators covered four domains: (1) individual resilience, (2) crisis prevention, (3) organizational resilience, and (4) climate resilience. N = 34 practices participated in the piloting and the process evaluation. Participants generally attributed a high relevance to the domains, and considered the indicator set suitable for implementation into existing quality management systems. Planning and implementation of measures that strengthen crisis resilience in practices were triggered or intensified by piloting the indicators and by the two-part feedback report. The identified challenges involved the volume of indicators and practice-individual implementation of renewable energy sources on rented premises. Participants expressed their desire for peer exchange regarding proven concepts for crisis resilience.
近年来,全球卫生系统面临着诸如自然灾害或新冠疫情等多重危机,这些危机影响了许多人的生命和健康。鉴于感染浪潮和高温天气,气候变化被认为是21世纪最大的健康威胁。因此,增强医疗机构中个人和组织的危机适应能力,成为在此类危机期间维持医疗质量和保护脆弱患者的关键因素。RESILARE项目旨在开发和评估质量指标,以支持基层医疗实践应对与危机相关的挑战并进行调整。
在一个分三个阶段的过程中,指标开发基于系统的文献研究和定性数据、两阶段的专家小组流程,以及在外展访问期间在最多n = 35个门诊实践中进行的试点测试。通过反馈报告提供与实践个体指标相关的状态和基准信息,以完成审核和反馈计划。一个混合方法的过程评估采用了对参与的全科医生和非医师卫生专业人员进行半结构化访谈,以探讨实施所推导的质量指标集所面临的支持和挑战。进行了两项在线调查,以评估所有指标和两部分反馈报告。定性数据采用主题分析方法进行归纳分析。调查数据进行描述性分析。
总共n = 32个指标涵盖四个领域:(1)个人适应能力,(2)危机预防,(3)组织适应能力,以及(4)气候适应能力。n = 34个实践参与了试点和过程评估。参与者普遍认为这些领域具有高度相关性,并认为该指标集适合纳入现有的质量管理系统。通过试点指标和两部分反馈报告,触发或加强了在实践中加强危机适应能力的措施的规划和实施。所确定的挑战包括指标数量以及在租赁场所实施可再生能源的实践个体情况。参与者表达了他们希望就经过验证的危机适应能力概念进行同行交流的愿望。