Chang Yee Y, Carville Keryln, Tay Ai C
Nursing Division, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Silver Chain Group and School of Nursing Midwifery, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):977-83. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12572. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
Skin tears appear to be a hidden and extensive problem despite an increased focus in the literature on skin tear epidemiology, prevention strategies and management modalities. Currently, there has been no report of skin tear epidemiology published in Singapore. The aim of the present study was to pilot the methodology by WoundWest at one of the tertairy hospitals in Singapore. The secondary objective was to determine the prevalence and current nursing management of skin tears within two selected acute medical wards in the hospital. A point prevalence survey was conducted within the two medical wards. Six registered nurses acted as the surveyors and underwent pre-survey education. Inter-rater reliability testing was conducted. Surveyors were paired and performed skin examinations on all available patients in the two wards. Data were collected on age, gender, skin tear anatomical locations, their Skin Tear Audit Research categories, dressings used on identified skin tears and related documentation. A total of 144 (98%) patients consented to skin inspections. Findings demonstrated a skin tear prevalence of 6·2%; all skin tears were found to be hospital-acquired and located on the extremities. Most (78%) were in the age range of 70-89 years. There was a dearth in nursing documentation of the skin tears identified and their management. The findings suggested that nurses were lacking in the knowledge of skin tears, and documentation, if available, was not consistent. There is an urgent clinical need for the implementation of a validated skin tear classification tool; standardised protocols for skin tear prevention and management; and a comprehensive skin tear educational programme for hospital care staff. Quarterly hospital-wide skin tear prevalence surveys are also needed to evaluate improvement strategies.
尽管文献中对皮肤撕裂的流行病学、预防策略和管理方式的关注有所增加,但皮肤撕裂似乎是一个隐藏且广泛存在的问题。目前,新加坡尚未发表关于皮肤撕裂流行病学的报告。本研究的目的是在新加坡的一家三级医院试用WoundWest的方法。次要目标是确定该医院两个选定的急性内科病房中皮肤撕裂的患病率及当前的护理管理情况。在这两个内科病房进行了现况调查。六名注册护士担任调查员,并接受了调查前培训。进行了评估者间信度测试。调查员两两配对,对两个病房所有可及的患者进行皮肤检查。收集了患者的年龄、性别、皮肤撕裂的解剖位置、其皮肤撕裂审核研究类别、已识别皮肤撕裂所使用的敷料及相关记录。共有144名(98%)患者同意进行皮肤检查。结果显示皮肤撕裂患病率为6.2%;所有皮肤撕裂均为医院获得性,且位于四肢。大多数(78%)患者年龄在70 - 89岁之间。已识别的皮肤撕裂及其管理在护理记录方面存在不足。研究结果表明护士缺乏皮肤撕裂方面的知识,且现有记录不一致。临床迫切需要实施经过验证的皮肤撕裂分类工具;皮肤撕裂预防和管理的标准化方案;以及针对医院护理人员的全面皮肤撕裂教育计划。还需要每季度进行全院范围的皮肤撕裂患病率调查,以评估改进策略。