• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦某医院住院患者四肢皮肤撕裂伤的发生率。

Prevalence of skin tears in the extremities in inpatients at a hospital in Denmark.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Copenhagen Wound Healing Centre, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2018 Apr;15(2):212-217. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12847. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.12847
PMID:29464916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7950313/
Abstract

The aims of the study were to determine the prevalence of skin tears in the extremities and to explore factors associated with development of skin tears in inpatients at a Danish hospital. The study was designed as a point prevalence survey and included 202 patients in the age range 19-99 (mean: 70·7, SD: 16·5). The patients were assessed for presence of skin tears, numbers, locations and previous skin tears. Data were collected using a data collection sheet developed for a previous study. The survey team consisted of four specialist nurses. Data were collected over a period of 24 hours spread over 3 days. Of the 202 patients, 23 had skin tears, yielding a prevalence of 11·4%. In total, 40 skin tears were observed. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that previous skin tears (odds ratio (OR): 9·3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2·6-33·4, P < 0·001), ecchymosis (OR: 5·6, CI: 1·4-23·2, P < 0·017) and risk of falling (OR: 3·8, CI: 1·2-12·0, P < 0·021) were significantly associated with development of skin tears. The prevalence of skin tears in this study (11·4%) matches other international observations. The following risk factors were recognised: previous skin tear, ecchymosis and risk of falling. These factors could be used to identify patients requiring prevention of skin tears.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定丹麦医院住院患者四肢皮肤撕裂伤的发生率,并探讨与皮肤撕裂伤发生相关的因素。本研究设计为现况调查,纳入了年龄在 19-99 岁之间的 202 名患者(平均年龄:70.7,标准差:16.5)。对患者进行皮肤撕裂伤的有无、数量、部位和既往皮肤撕裂伤情况评估。使用为之前的研究制定的数据收集表收集数据。调查小组由 4 名专科护士组成。数据收集在 3 天内持续 24 小时进行。在 202 名患者中,有 23 名患者发生皮肤撕裂伤,发生率为 11.4%。共观察到 40 处皮肤撕裂伤。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,既往皮肤撕裂伤(比值比(OR):9.3,95%置信区间(CI):2.6-33.4,P<0.001)、瘀斑(OR:5.6,CI:1.4-23.2,P<0.017)和跌倒风险(OR:3.8,CI:1.2-12.0,P<0.021)与皮肤撕裂伤的发生显著相关。本研究中皮肤撕裂伤的发生率(11.4%)与其他国际观察结果一致。确定了以下危险因素:既往皮肤撕裂伤、瘀斑和跌倒风险。这些因素可用于识别需要预防皮肤撕裂伤的患者。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of skin tears in the extremities in inpatients at a hospital in Denmark.丹麦某医院住院患者四肢皮肤撕裂伤的发生率。
Int Wound J. 2018 Apr;15(2):212-217. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12847. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Prevalence of skin tears in the extremities among elderly residents at a nursing home in Denmark.丹麦一家养老院老年居民四肢皮肤撕裂的患病率。
J Wound Care. 2017 Feb;26(Sup2):S32-S36. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup2.S32.
3
Malnutrition is independently associated with skin tears in hospital inpatient setting-Findings of a 6-year point prevalence audit.营养不良与住院患者皮肤撕裂独立相关——一项 6 年时点患病率的审计研究结果。
Int Wound J. 2018 Aug;15(4):527-533. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12893. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
The prevalence of skin tears in the acute care setting in Singapore.新加坡急性护理环境中皮肤撕裂伤的患病率。
Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):977-83. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12572. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
5
Skin tear prevalence in an Australian acute care hospital: A 10-year analysis.澳大利亚一家急症医院皮肤撕裂伤的发生率:一项 10 年分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Oct;19(6):1418-1427. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13735. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
6
Incidence of skin tears in the extremities among elderly patients at a long-term medical facility in Japan: A prospective cohort study.日本一家长期医疗机构中老年患者四肢皮肤撕裂的发生率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Aug;15(8):1058-63. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12405. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
7
The prevalence and associated factors of skin tears in Belgian nursing homes: A cross-sectional observational study.比利时养老院皮肤撕裂的患病率及相关因素:一项横断面观察性研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2019 May;28(2):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
8
Risk scoring tool for forearm skin tears in Japanese older adults: A prospective cohort study.用于日本老年人前臂皮肤撕裂的风险评分工具:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2021 May;30(2):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
9
A risk model for the prediction of skin tears in aged care residents: A prospective cohort study.老年人皮肤撕裂风险预测模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2019 Feb;16(1):52-63. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12985. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
10
Identification of risk factors associated with the development of skin tears in hospitalised older persons: a case-control study.住院老年人皮肤撕裂伤发生相关危险因素的识别:一项病例对照研究。
Int Wound J. 2016 Dec;13(6):1246-1251. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12490. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors of skin tear in older persons: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人皮肤撕裂的危险因素:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 16;14(9):e080106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080106.
2
The Turkish version of the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES): Validity and reliability study.皮肤撕裂知识评估工具(OASES)的土耳其语版本:效度与信度研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Aug;21(8):e70013. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70013.
3
Knowledge status of skin tear prevention and its demographic and occupational influencing factors: A National cross-sectional survey among nurses.皮肤撕裂预防的知识现状及其人口统计学和职业影响因素:一项针对护士的全国性横断面调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1412-1422. doi: 10.1111/jan.16353. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Skin tears in older patients in intensive care units: A multicentre point prevalence study.重症监护病房老年患者的皮肤撕裂:一项多中心现况调查研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e13131. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13131. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
5
Skin tear prevalence in an Australian acute care hospital: A 10-year analysis.澳大利亚一家急症医院皮肤撕裂伤的发生率:一项 10 年分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Oct;19(6):1418-1427. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13735. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
6
Models for predicting skin tears: A comparison.预测皮肤撕裂的模型:比较。
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):823-830. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13340. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
7
ISTAP classification for skin tears: Validation for Brazilian Portuguese.ISTAP 分类法在皮肤撕脱伤中的应用:巴西葡萄牙语验证。
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):310-316. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13271. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
8
Standardizing the classification of skin tears: validity and reliability testing of the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel Classification System in 44 countries.标准化皮肤撕裂伤分类:国际皮肤撕伤病咨询小组分类系统在 44 个国家的有效性和可靠性测试。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jul;183(1):146-154. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18604. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
9
Swedish translation and validation of the international skin tear advisory panel skin tear classification system.国际皮肤撕脱咨询小组皮肤撕脱分类系统的瑞典语翻译和验证。
Int Wound J. 2019 Feb;16(1):13-18. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12975. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of skin tears in the extremities among elderly residents at a nursing home in Denmark.丹麦一家养老院老年居民四肢皮肤撕裂的患病率。
J Wound Care. 2017 Feb;26(Sup2):S32-S36. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup2.S32.
2
The prevalence of skin tears in the acute care setting in Singapore.新加坡急性护理环境中皮肤撕裂伤的患病率。
Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):977-83. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12572. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
3
Danish translation and validation of the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel Skin Tear Classification System.国际皮肤撕裂咨询小组皮肤撕裂分类系统的丹麦语翻译与验证
J Wound Care. 2015 Aug;24(8):388-92. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.8.388.
4
Identification of risk factors associated with the development of skin tears in hospitalised older persons: a case-control study.住院老年人皮肤撕裂伤发生相关危险因素的识别:一项病例对照研究。
Int Wound J. 2016 Dec;13(6):1246-1251. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12490. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
5
[Skin tear prevalence and associated factors: a systematic review].[皮肤撕裂伤的患病率及相关因素:一项系统综述]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015 Aug;49(4):674-80. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000400019.
6
Incidence of skin tears in the extremities among elderly patients at a long-term medical facility in Japan: A prospective cohort study.日本一家长期医疗机构中老年患者四肢皮肤撕裂的发生率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Aug;15(8):1058-63. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12405. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
7
Exploring the prevalence of skin tears and skin properties related to skin tears in elderly patients at a long-term medical facility in Japan.在日本一家长期医疗机构中,探究老年患者皮肤撕裂的发生率以及与皮肤撕裂相关的皮肤特性。
Int Wound J. 2016 Apr;13(2):189-97. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12251. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
International Skin Tear Advisory Panel: a tool kit to aid in the prevention, assessment, and treatment of skin tears using a Simplified Classification System ©.国际皮肤撕脱咨询小组:使用简化分类系统辅助预防、评估和治疗皮肤撕脱的工具包©。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013 Oct;26(10):459-76; quiz 477-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000434056.04071.68.
9
[Prevalence of skin tears among hospitalized patients with cancer].
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2012 Oct;46 Spec No:44-50. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342012000700007.
10
Skin tear prevention and management among patients in the acute aged care and rehabilitation units in the Australian Capital Territory: a best practice implementation project.澳大利亚首都领地急性老年护理和康复病房中患者的皮肤撕裂预防和管理:最佳实践实施项目。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):429-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00234.x.