Letsch Harald, Gottsberger Brigitte, Ware Jessica L
Department für Botanik und Biodiversitätsforschung, Universität Wien, Rennweg 14, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Biology, Rutgers University, 195 University Ave, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2016 Mar;25(6):1340-53. doi: 10.1111/mec.13562. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
Ecological diversification of aquatic insects has long been suspected to have been driven by differences in freshwater habitats, which can be classified into flowing (lotic) waters and standing (lentic) waters. The contrasting characteristics of lotic and lentic freshwater systems imply different ecological constraints on their inhabitants. The ephemeral and discontinuous character of most lentic water bodies may encourage dispersal by lentic species in turn reducing geographical isolation among populations. Hence, speciation probability would be lower in lentic species. Here, we assess the impact of habitat use on diversification patterns in dragonflies (Anisoptera: Odonata). Based on the eight nuclear and mitochondrial genes, we inferred species diversification with a model-based evolutionary framework, to account for rate variation through time and among lineages and to estimate the impact of larval habitat on the potentially nonrandom diversification among anisopteran groups. Ancestral state reconstruction revealed lotic fresh water systems as their original primary habitat, while lentic waters have been colonized independently in Aeshnidae, Corduliidae and Libellulidae. Furthermore, our results indicate a positive correlation of speciation and lentic habitat colonization by dragonflies: speciation rates increased in lentic Aeshnidae and Libellulidae, whereas they remain mostly uniform among lotic groups. This contradicts the hypothesis of inherently lower speciation in lentic groups and suggests species with larger ranges are more likely to diversify, perhaps due to higher probability of larger areas being dissected by geographical barriers. Furthermore, larger range sizes may comprise more habitat types, which could also promote speciation by providing additional niches, allowing the coexistence of emerging species.
长期以来,人们一直怀疑水生昆虫的生态多样化是由淡水栖息地的差异驱动的,淡水栖息地可分为流动(流水)水域和静止(静水)水域。流水和静水淡水系统的不同特征意味着对其栖息生物有不同的生态限制。大多数静水水体会短暂且不连续,这可能会促使静水物种扩散,进而减少种群之间的地理隔离。因此,静水物种的物种形成概率会更低。在这里,我们评估栖息地利用对蜻蜓(差翅亚目:蜻蜓目)多样化模式的影响。基于八个核基因和线粒体基因,我们使用基于模型的进化框架推断物种多样化,以解释随时间和谱系的速率变化,并估计幼虫栖息地对差翅亚目群体间潜在非随机多样化的影响。祖先状态重建显示流水淡水系统是它们最初的主要栖息地,而静水水域在蜓科、大蜓科和蜻科中是独立定殖的。此外,我们的结果表明蜻蜓的物种形成与静水栖息地定殖呈正相关:静水蜓科和蜻科的物种形成速率增加,而流水类群中的物种形成速率大多保持一致。这与静水类群中物种形成本质上较低的假设相矛盾,并表明分布范围更广的物种更有可能多样化,这可能是因为更大面积被地理屏障分割的可能性更高。此外,更大的分布范围可能包含更多的栖息地类型,这也可能通过提供额外的生态位来促进物种形成,使新出现的物种能够共存。