Abbatemarco Justin R, Bennett Courtney, Bell Adrian J, Dunne Laura, Matsumura Martin E
SELECT Program, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA.
The Cardiovascular Research Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown PA, USA.
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Jan 8;4:2050312115616136. doi: 10.1177/2050312115616136. eCollection 2016.
Despite robust growth in participation in marathons and endurance sports among older individuals, guidance regarding pre-participation cardiovascular evaluation of these athletes is lacking. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of currently available pre-participation cardiovascular evaluation guidelines as applied to a cohort of older novice endurance athletes.
We applied data from 1457 novice runners and endurance athletes aged 35 years and older to two pre-participation screening tools, the American Heart Association/American College of Sports Medicine Pre-Participation Questionnaire and the 2001 Working Group recommendations for pre-participation screening of masters athletes (2001 Masters).
Application of the American Heart Association/American College of Sports Medicine Pre-Participation Questionnaire identified 42.1% for which pre-participation cardiovascular evaluation was indicated. Of those who met criteria, 51.5% reported completion of a healthcare evaluation. Application of the 2001 Masters guidelines identified 75.2% who qualified for pre-participation electrocardiogram and 34.0% for pre-participation stress testing. Of those who met 2001 Masters criteria for pre-participation testing, 43.7% and 24.6% underwent recommended electrocardiogram and stress testing, respectively. While there was modest concordance with recommendations for pre-participation evaluations based on both American Heart Association/American College of Sports Medicine Pre-Participation Questionnaire and 2001 Masters, only athlete age was independently associated with completion of a pre-participation healthcare evaluation and only athlete age and athlete's participation in marathons were independently associated with pre-participation stress testing.
Among older novice endurance athletes, application of the American Heart Association/American College of Sports Medicine Pre-Participation Questionnaire and 2001 Masters guidelines identifies a significant percentage of athletes for whom pre-participation evaluation and testing are recommended. Concordance with these guidelines was modest and providers were primarily influenced by athlete age and competitive goals when planning pre-participation testing. Given the rarity of cardiovascular events among older participants in endurance events, the cost-effectiveness of the American Heart Association/American College of Sports Medicine Pre-Participation Questionnaire and 2001 Masters guidelines may be unacceptable for general use.
尽管老年人参加马拉松和耐力运动的人数强劲增长,但对于这些运动员赛前心血管评估的指导却很缺乏。本研究的目的是评估目前可用的赛前心血管评估指南应用于一组老年新手耐力运动员的效用。
我们将1457名年龄在35岁及以上的新手跑步者和耐力运动员的数据应用于两种赛前筛查工具,即美国心脏协会/美国运动医学学院赛前问卷和2001年工作组关于老年运动员赛前筛查的建议(2001年老年组)。
应用美国心脏协会/美国运动医学学院赛前问卷,确定42.1%的人需要进行赛前心血管评估。在符合标准的人中,51.5%报告完成了健康评估。应用2001年老年组指南,确定75.2%的人符合赛前心电图检查条件,34.0%的人符合赛前压力测试条件。在符合2001年老年组赛前测试标准的人中,分别有43.7%和24.6%接受了推荐的心电图和压力测试。虽然基于美国心脏协会/美国运动医学学院赛前问卷和2001年老年组的赛前评估建议有适度的一致性,但只有运动员年龄与完成赛前健康评估独立相关,只有运动员年龄和运动员参加马拉松比赛与赛前压力测试独立相关。
在老年新手耐力运动员中,应用美国心脏协会/美国运动医学学院赛前问卷和2001年老年组指南确定了很大比例的运动员需要进行赛前评估和测试。与这些指南的一致性适度,提供者在规划赛前测试时主要受运动员年龄和竞技目标的影响。鉴于老年耐力项目参与者中心血管事件的罕见性,美国心脏协会/美国运动医学学院赛前问卷和2001年老年组指南的成本效益可能不适合普遍使用。