Toaimah Fatihi Hassan Soliman, Mohammad Hala Mohammad Fathi
From the *Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha; and †Department of Clinical Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, Al Rayyan, Qatar; and ‡Department of Pediatrics, Zagazig University Hospital, Zagazig; and §Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Feb;32(2):131-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000708.
Rapid intravenous (IV) rehydration is commonly used for the management of pediatric gastroenteritis in the emergency department. The current practice shows wide variation in the volume and rate of rapid IV hydration. The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of rapid IV rehydration compared with standard method in children with gastroenteritis.
MEDLINE (1946-2014), EMBASE (1974-2014), and CENTRAL via the Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2014) were systematically searched to identify eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials of rapid IV rehydration in children with gastroenteritis.
A total of 1513 articles were retrieved, and our inclusion criteria were met by 3 studies, with a total of 464 participants. The percentage of children who were successfully rehydrated and tolerated oral fluids at 2 to 4 hours after starting IV fluid therapy ranged from 69% to 100% in both rapid IV rehydration and standard method. Time to discharge ranged from 2 to 6 hours (rapid rehydration) versus 2 to 5 hours (standard rehydration). Emergency department revisits ranged from 3% to 16% (rapid rehydration) versus 5% to 14% (standard). Summarized results suggested that rapid IV rehydration may be associated with longer time-to-discharge and higher readmission rates. The new evidence fails to demonstrate superiority of large-volume (60 mL/kg/h) over standard (20 mL/kg/h) IV rehydration.
Standard volume IV rehydration for 1 to 4 hours followed by oral hydration or maintenance IV fluids seems sufficient for most children with gastroenteritis requiring IV fluid administration. However, more evidence is needed to establish an optimal IV rehydration regimen.
在急诊科,快速静脉补液常用于小儿胃肠炎的治疗。目前的实践表明,快速静脉补液的量和速度差异很大。本综述的目的是评估与标准方法相比,快速静脉补液对胃肠炎患儿的疗效。
系统检索MEDLINE(1946 - 2014年)、EMBASE(1974 - 2014年)以及通过Cochrane图书馆检索的CENTRAL(2014年第8期),以确定符合条件的研究。纳入标准为关于胃肠炎患儿快速静脉补液的随机对照试验。
共检索到1513篇文章,3项研究符合我们的纳入标准,共有464名参与者。在开始静脉补液治疗后2至4小时,快速静脉补液组和标准方法组中成功补液且能耐受口服液体的儿童百分比在69%至100%之间。出院时间为2至6小时(快速补液)对比2至5小时(标准补液)。急诊科复诊率为3%至16%(快速补液)对比5%至14%(标准补液)。汇总结果表明,快速静脉补液可能与更长的出院时间和更高的再入院率相关。新证据未能证明大容量(60 mL/kg/h)静脉补液优于标准(20 mL/kg/h)静脉补液。
对于大多数需要静脉补液的胃肠炎患儿,先进行1至4小时的标准量静脉补液,随后口服补液或维持静脉补液似乎就足够了。然而,需要更多证据来确定最佳的静脉补液方案。