• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾血管整块结扎是安全的,并且可缩短手术时间。

En bloc ligation of renal vessels is safe and reduces duration of surgery.

作者信息

Azawi Nessn Htum, Hult Mariam Annalisa Skibsted, Dahl Claus, Fode Mikkel

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).

PMID:26836796
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Conventionally, individual ligation of the renal vessels with clips is performed during laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN). Concomitant ligation of the vessels is not a standard procedure due to an expected risk of stapler dysfunction and the development of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). Using the EndoGIA stapler 45/2.5 mm, we compared en bloc ligation with individual ligation during LN and nephroureterectomy (LNU) with a special focus on the development of AVF and technique safety.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all patients undergoing LN or LNU at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark, between January 2010 and April 2014. The follow-up period was minimum six months.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients underwent LN and 56 patients underwent LNU. In the LN group, 77 patients underwent en bloc ligation. The mean surgical time was significantly reduced to 89 minutes in the en bloc group compared to 109 minutes in the conventional group (p = 0.0001). The difference remained significant with multivariate analysis. In the LNU group, seven patients underwent en bloc ligation. There was no significant difference between conventional ligation and en bloc ligation with respect to surgical time in either the univariate or the multivariate analyses. None of the patients needed blood transfusion. With a mean follow-up of 13.5 months, no AVF were found.

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc ligation appears to be safe and can reduce the surgical time during LN without increased risk of blood transfusion and without development of AVF. Further studies are needed to assess any advantages associated with use of the method during LNU.

FUNDING

none.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not relevant.

摘要

引言

传统上,腹腔镜肾切除术(LN)期间需用夹子对肾血管进行逐一结扎。由于吻合器功能障碍和动静脉瘘(AVF)形成的预期风险,同时结扎血管并非标准操作。我们使用45/2.5毫米的EndoGIA吻合器,比较了LN和肾输尿管切除术(LNU)期间整块结扎与逐一结扎的效果,特别关注AVF的发生情况和技术安全性。

方法

这是一项对2010年1月至2014年4月期间在丹麦罗斯基勒医院泌尿外科接受LN或LNU的所有患者进行的回顾性研究。随访期至少为6个月。

结果

共有228例患者接受了LN,56例患者接受了LNU。在LN组中,77例患者接受了整块结扎。整块结扎组的平均手术时间显著缩短至89分钟,而传统组为109分钟(p = 0.0001)。多因素分析时差异仍然显著。在LNU组中,7例患者接受了整块结扎。单因素和多因素分析中,传统结扎与整块结扎在手术时间方面均无显著差异。所有患者均无需输血。平均随访13.5个月,未发现AVF。

结论

整块结扎似乎是安全的,可减少LN期间的手术时间,且不会增加输血风险和AVF的发生。需要进一步研究以评估该方法在LNU中使用的任何优势。

资金来源

无。

试验注册

不相关。

相似文献

1
En bloc ligation of renal vessels is safe and reduces duration of surgery.肾血管整块结扎是安全的,并且可缩短手术时间。
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
2
Prospective radiographic followup after en bloc ligation of the renal hilum.肾门整块结扎术后的前瞻性影像学随访。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1888-91; discussion 1891. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.042. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
3
Efficacy and safety of en bloc ligation of renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy.腹腔镜肾切除术中肾门整块结扎的疗效与安全性
Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):226-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.046. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
4
Does the stapler for en bloc resection of renal pedicles during kidney removal surgery increase the risk of arteriovenous fistula?在肾切除术的整块切除肾蒂手术中,订书机是否会增加动静脉瘘的风险?
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Mar;82(3):221-224. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000032.
5
Advantages of en bloc hilar ligation during laparoscopic extirpative renal surgery.腹腔镜肾切除术中整块肾门结扎的优势
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1503-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0380.
6
Comparative analysis of pedicular vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy: en bloc stapling or separate ligation?腹腔镜肾切除术期间肾蒂血管控制技术的比较分析:整块缝合钉合还是分别结扎?
Urol Int. 2015;94(1):79-82. doi: 10.1159/000363250. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
7
Safety and Efficacy of En Bloc Renal Hilar Vascular Staple Ligation: A Meta-Analysis.整块肾脏肾门血管吻合钉结扎的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.077. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
8
En bloc stapling of renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy.腹腔镜肾切除术和肾输尿管切除术期间肾蒂的整块缝合钉合术
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.037.
9
En Bloc Stapling of the Renal Hilum During Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Double-institutional Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.腹腔镜肾切除术期间肾门整块缝合钉合术:一项双机构安全性和有效性分析
Urology. 2017 Jul;105:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.051. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Safety of en bloc ligation of the renal hilum during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌时肾门整块结扎的安全性:一项随机对照试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Jun;23(6):489-94. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0444. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy.腹腔镜肾切除术期间肾血管控制技术的比较
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):192-196. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_287_19.