• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射技师在解读计算机断层结肠造影方面是重要的贡献者。

Radiographers are valuable contributors in interpreting computed tomography colonography.

作者信息

Thomsen Hanne, Egelund Mark, Strozik Joanna-Edyta, Vuust Morten

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).

PMID:26836797
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is the primary radiological examination for detection of colorectal cancer and premalignant polyps. It is a complex technique that requires special training and experience of both the radiographers performing the colonography and the radiologists who interpret the results. The considerable number of CTC performed means that interpretation of the examinations is a time-consuming task for radiologists. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiographers who received a training programme in colon diagnosing.

METHODS

During the period from December 2014 to May 2015, 126 patients underwent CTC screening or diagnostics. The colon was interpreted by both a radiographer and an experienced radiologist. Subsequently, results were compared and consensus established.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included, six polyps (6-9 mm), one polyp (≥ 10 mm), four cancer suspect areas and four second opinions. The result was nine true positives, three false positives, no false negatives and 84 true negatives corresponding to a negative predictive value of 1.000 and an accuracy of 0.969.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that radiographers can be a valuable contribution in the interpretation of CTC.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Marie Pedersen and Jensine Heiberg's legat, Vendsyssel Hospital, Denmark.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not relevant.

摘要

引言

计算机断层扫描结肠成像(CTC)是检测结直肠癌和癌前息肉的主要影像学检查方法。它是一项复杂的技术,需要进行结肠成像的放射技师以及解读结果的放射科医生都具备特殊的培训和经验。大量的CTC检查意味着对这些检查结果的解读对放射科医生来说是一项耗时的任务。因此,本研究旨在评估接受结肠诊断培训计划的放射技师的诊断性能。

方法

在2014年12月至2015年5月期间,126例患者接受了CTC筛查或诊断。由一名放射技师和一名经验丰富的放射科医生对结肠进行解读。随后,比较结果并达成共识。

结果

共纳入100例患者,发现6个息肉(6 - 9毫米)、1个息肉(≥10毫米)、4个癌症疑似区域以及4个二次诊断意见。结果为9例假阳性、3例假阴性、无假阴性以及84例真阴性,阴性预测值为1.000,准确率为0.969。

结论

本研究表明,放射技师在CTC解读方面可以做出有价值的贡献。

资助

本研究由丹麦文叙瑟勒医院的玛丽·佩德森和延西娜·海贝格遗赠基金资助。

试验注册

不相关。

相似文献

1
Radiographers are valuable contributors in interpreting computed tomography colonography.放射技师在解读计算机断层结肠造影方面是重要的贡献者。
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
2
Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography in a nationwide multicentre trial, and its relation to radiologist expertise.全国多中心试验中计算机断层结肠成像的准确性及其与放射科医生专业水平的关系。
Gut. 2011 May;60(5):658-65. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.225623. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
3
Computed tomographic colonography: how many and how fast should radiologists report?计算机断层结肠成像:放射科医生应该报告多少个息肉以及多快报告?
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):5784-5790. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06175-y. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
Gastroenterologists' interpretation of CTC: a pilot study demonstrating feasibility and similar accuracy compared with radiologists' interpretation.胃肠病学家对 CTC 的解读:一项与放射科医生解读相比具有可行性和相似准确性的初步研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec;104(12):2926-31. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.452. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
5
CT colonography: accuracy of initial interpretation by radiographers in routine clinical practice.CT 结肠成像:放射技师在常规临床实践中的初始解读准确性。
Clin Radiol. 2010 Feb;65(2):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
6
CT colonography training for radiographers--a formal evaluation.CT 结肠成像技师培训——一项正式评估。
Clin Radiol. 2010 Dec;65(12):997-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of radiographer reporting of computed tomography colonography examinations: a systematic review.放射技师报告 CT 结肠成像检查的诊断准确性:系统评价。
Clin Radiol. 2013 Apr;68(4):e177-90. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.11.005. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
8
Comparison of radiologists' confidence in excluding significant colorectal neoplasia with multidetector-row CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema.多排螺旋CT结肠成像与双重对比钡灌肠在放射科医生排除重大结直肠肿瘤方面的信心比较。
Br J Radiol. 2006 Mar;79(939):208-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/99126323.
9
Computed tomography colonography ("virtual colonoscopy") in Israel: results of the National CT Colonography Survey of the Israeli Association of Abdominal Imaging and the Israeli Radiological Association.以色列的计算机断层扫描结肠成像(“虚拟结肠镜检查”):以色列腹部影像协会和以色列放射协会全国CT结肠成像调查结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2008 Oct;10(10):707-12.
10
Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training.CT结肠成像中的阅片者误差:原因及对培训的影响
Eur Radiol. 2006 Oct;16(10):2275-83. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0299-x. Epub 2006 May 16.