Patil V M, Chakraborty S, Dessai S, Kumar S S, Ratheesan K, Bindu T, Geetha M, Sujith K, Babu S, Raghavan V, Nair C K, Syam V, Surij S, Sathessan B
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Malabar Cancer Center, Thallassery, Kerala, India.
Indian J Cancer. 2015 Jan-Mar;52(1):157-61. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.175590.
There is deficit of data from India on elderly patients with cancer. Comprehensive geriatric assessment may lead to a better decision making capacity in this population. However, routine implementation of such assessment is resource consuming.
The aim of this study was to determine the patterns of care in elderly patients treated at a tertiary rural cancer center in India.
All patients with age 70 or above with solid tumors without any definitive treatment prior to the registration at our center and registered between 01/01/2010 and 31/12/2011 were selected for this study. The baseline demographic pattern and the pattern of care of treatment were analyzed. SPSS version 16 (IBM Inc, Armonk, New York, U.S.) was used for analysis. Descriptive data are provided.
A total of 761 patients were evaluable subject to the aforementioned inclusion criteria. The median age of this cohort was 75 years (70-95 years). The most frequent primary sites of malignancies in 451 males were head neck (32.4%), lung (23.3%) and gastrointestinal (23.3%). In 310 females, the most common sites were head neck (31.6%), gynecological (18.4%) and gastrointestinal (24.5%). 228 (30%) of the patients had localized disease, 376 (49.4%) had loco-regionally advanced disease and 145 (19.1%) had distant metastases at presentation. 334 (46.32%) of patients were treated with curative intent. On logistic regression analysis the factors that predicted use of curative intent treatment were age <75 years, performance status 0-1, primary site and clinical extent of disease.
Routine comprehensive geriatric assessment needs to be implemented in our setting as almost 50% of our geriatric patients undergo curative intent treatment.
印度缺乏关于老年癌症患者的数据。综合老年评估可能会提高该人群的决策能力。然而,常规实施此类评估会消耗资源。
本研究的目的是确定在印度一家农村三级癌症中心接受治疗的老年患者的护理模式。
选择所有年龄在70岁及以上、患有实体瘤、在我们中心登记前未接受任何确定性治疗且于2010年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间登记的患者进行本研究。分析了基线人口统计学模式和治疗护理模式。使用SPSS 16版(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行分析。提供了描述性数据。
共有761名患者符合上述纳入标准并可进行评估。该队列的中位年龄为75岁(70 - 95岁)。451名男性中最常见的恶性肿瘤原发部位是头颈(32.4%)、肺(23.3%)和胃肠道(23.3%)。在310名女性中,最常见的部位是头颈(31.6%)、妇科(18.4%)和胃肠道(24.5%)。228名(30%)患者为局限性疾病,376名(49.4%)为局部区域进展期疾病,145名(19.1%)患者在就诊时已有远处转移。334名(46.32%)患者接受了根治性治疗。逻辑回归分析显示,预测采用根治性治疗的因素为年龄<75岁、体能状态0 - 1、原发部位和疾病临床范围。
我们的环境中需要实施常规综合老年评估,因为几乎50%的老年患者接受了根治性治疗。