Schaefer Kai, Rensing Susanne, Hillen Heinz, Burkhardt John E, Germann Paul-Georg
AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Knollstrasse, Ludwigshafen, Germany
AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Knollstrasse, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Toxicol Pathol. 2016 Apr;44(3):474-9. doi: 10.1177/0192623315624572. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
Dogs have been often chosen as a nonrodent species for preclinical development of small molecule drugs mainly due to availability and relative ease of handling. Recently, focus has increased on the minipig as a potential alternative to the dog, based on either scientific rationale or public opinion concerns. There are, however, other factors influencing nonrodent choices, in particular drug amount and synthesis time, which differ between species and therefore may impact the milestones of a drug development program. To assess the magnitude of compound need, a retrospective internal survey was conducted on drug amounts used in dog studies which were translated into the requirements for minipigs. Compound need approximately doubles if minipigs are used. Costs of compound are accordingly higher, and synthesis times are slightly increased. In our company, the differences were not considered significant enough to preclude the use of minipigs if the later preclinical program might benefit from improved human risk prediction.
狗常被选作小分子药物临床前开发的非啮齿类动物,主要是因为其易得性和相对易于处理。最近,基于科学依据或公众舆论关注,小型猪作为狗的潜在替代品受到了更多关注。然而,还有其他因素影响非啮齿类动物的选择,特别是药物用量和合成时间,不同物种之间存在差异,因此可能会影响药物开发项目的各个阶段。为了评估化合物需求的规模,我们进行了一项回顾性内部调查,统计了狗研究中使用的药物量,并将其换算为小型猪的需求。如果使用小型猪,化合物需求大约会翻倍。相应地,化合物成本会更高,合成时间也会略有增加。在我们公司,如果后期临床前项目可能受益于改进的人类风险预测,这些差异被认为不足以排除使用小型猪。