Reid Lee B, Boyd Roslyn N, Cunnington Ross, Rose Stephen E
The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:2643491. doi: 10.1155/2016/2643491. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Direct measurement of recovery from brain injury is an important goal in neurorehabilitation, and requires reliable, objective, and interpretable measures of changes in brain function, referred to generally as "neuroplasticity." One popular imaging modality for measuring neuroplasticity is task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (t-fMRI). In the field of neurorehabilitation, however, assessing neuroplasticity using t-fMRI presents a significant challenge. This commentary reviews t-fMRI changes commonly reported in patients with cerebral palsy or acquired brain injuries, with a focus on studies of motor rehabilitation, and discusses complexities surrounding their interpretations. Specifically, we discuss the difficulties in interpreting t-fMRI changes in terms of their underlying causes, that is, differentiating whether they reflect genuine reorganisation, neurological restoration, compensation, use of preexisting redundancies, changes in strategy, or maladaptive processes. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of heterogeneous disease states and essential t-fMRI processing steps on the interpretability of activation patterns. To better understand therapy-induced neuroplastic changes, we suggest that researchers utilising t-fMRI consider concurrently acquiring information from an additional modality, to quantify, for example, haemodynamic differences or microstructural changes. We outline a variety of such supplementary measures for investigating brain reorganisation and discuss situations in which they may prove beneficial to the interpretation of t-fMRI data.
直接测量脑损伤后的恢复情况是神经康复领域的一个重要目标,这需要可靠、客观且可解释的脑功能变化测量方法,一般称之为“神经可塑性”。一种用于测量神经可塑性的常用成像方式是基于任务的功能磁共振成像(t-fMRI)。然而,在神经康复领域,使用t-fMRI评估神经可塑性面临重大挑战。本评论回顾了脑瘫或后天性脑损伤患者中常见的t-fMRI变化,重点关注运动康复研究,并讨论了围绕这些变化解释的复杂性。具体而言,我们讨论了根据t-fMRI变化的潜在原因进行解释的困难,即区分它们是反映真正的重组、神经恢复、代偿、对先前冗余的利用、策略变化还是适应不良过程。此外,我们讨论了异质性疾病状态和t-fMRI基本处理步骤对激活模式可解释性的影响。为了更好地理解治疗诱导的神经可塑性变化,我们建议使用t-fMRI的研究人员同时从另一种模式获取信息,例如量化血流动力学差异或微观结构变化。我们概述了多种用于研究脑重组的此类补充措施,并讨论了它们可能有助于解释t-fMRI数据的情况。