Sanders Justin J, Robinson Maisha T, Block Susan D
1 Division of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ariadne Labs , Boston, Massachusetts.
2 Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, California.
J Palliat Med. 2016 Feb;19(2):202-27. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0325.
African Americans (AA) are more likely to receive worse end-of-life (EOL) care and are less likely to participate in advance care planning (ACP) than white Americans.
Our goal was to understand factors impacting ACP among AA and explore their interactions, in order to guide further research and intervention development.
We systematically identified, using Medline, Embase, and World of Science databases, the quantitative and qualitative ACP literature in which AA were included. We assessed the quality of these studies and evaluated the literature in an iterative and integrative fashion, using themes developed from the qualitative literature to understand and categorize findings from the quantitative literature.
Thirty-eight mostly moderate and low quality quantitative studies focused largely on advance directive (AD) completion. Whereas most conclude that AA, when compared with white Americans, prefer more aggressive care, participate less in ACP, and are more likely to informally discuss EOL care than to formally document wishes, study findings were contradictory in a number of domains. Fourteen qualitative studies revealed a number of themes that informed the development of an empirically derived model to explain the relationship of factors impacting ACP for AA along historical and structural axes.
The multiple factors that impact ACP for AA are inter-related and may result in part from historical realities that shape contemporary experience. We know little from the data about how best to improve ACP in AA. That AA appear to prefer informal discussions about ACP to formal documentation of preferences suggests that future research should focus on improving ACP conversations among clinicians, patients, and their families in order to improve the receipt of goal-concordant care at EOL.
非裔美国人比美国白人更有可能接受较差的临终关怀,且参与预先护理计划(ACP)的可能性更低。
我们的目标是了解影响非裔美国人ACP的因素,并探索它们之间的相互作用,以指导进一步的研究和干预措施的制定。
我们使用Medline、Embase和科学在线数据库系统地识别了纳入非裔美国人的定量和定性ACP文献。我们评估了这些研究的质量,并以迭代和综合的方式评估文献,利用定性文献中形成的主题来理解和分类定量文献中的研究结果。
38项大多为中等质量和低质量的定量研究主要集中在预先指示(AD)的完成情况。虽然大多数研究得出结论,与美国白人相比,非裔美国人更喜欢积极的治疗,参与ACP的程度较低,并且更有可能非正式地讨论临终关怀,而不是正式记录意愿,但在许多领域研究结果相互矛盾。14项定性研究揭示了一些主题,这些主题为一个基于实证的模型的发展提供了信息,该模型从历史和结构轴上解释了影响非裔美国人ACP的因素之间的关系。
影响非裔美国人ACP的多种因素相互关联,可能部分源于塑造当代经历的历史现实。从数据中我们对如何最好地改善非裔美国人的ACP知之甚少。非裔美国人似乎更喜欢关于ACP的非正式讨论,而不是对偏好进行正式记录,这表明未来的研究应侧重于改善临床医生、患者及其家人之间关于ACP的对话,以便在临终时更好地接受符合目标的护理。