• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Advance care planning as perceived by marginalized populations: Willing to engage and facing obstacles.边缘化群体对预先医疗照护计划的看法:愿意参与但面临阻碍。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0301426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301426. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessment of Feelings Towards Advanced Care Planning in the Latino Community.评估拉丁裔群体对高级医疗保健计划的感受。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Feb;41(2):187-192. doi: 10.1177/10499091231173413. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Attitudes and Perceptions on Advance Care Planning Among Chinese-Speaking Older Australians.讲华语的澳大利亚老年人对预先护理计划的态度和看法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Jun;41(7):814-823. doi: 10.1177/10499091231200366. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
"Don't Talk to Them About Goals of Care": Understanding Disparities in Advance Care Planning.“不要与他们谈论照护目标”:理解预先医疗照护计划中的差异。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Feb 3;77(2):339-346. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab091.
5
Normality and compassionate care: experiences from advanced cancer patients in their last time at home.常态与关怀:晚期癌症患者在家中临终时的体验。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02499-x.
6
Current Status of Advance Care Planning and End-of-life Communication for Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer.晚期和转移性乳腺癌患者的预先医疗指示和临终关怀沟通的现状。
Oncologist. 2021 Apr;26(4):e686-e693. doi: 10.1002/onco.13640. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
An examination of Latino advanced cancer patients' and their informal caregivers' preferences for communication about advance care planning: A qualitative study.对拉丁裔晚期癌症患者及其非正规照护者在预先医疗照护计划沟通方面的偏好进行的研究:一项定性研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Jun;18(3):277-284. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000890.
8
An Interview Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Advance Care Planning in ESRD.终末期肾病患者和照护者的预先医疗照护计划观点访谈研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Feb;71(2):216-224. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
9
Implementation and Impact of Patient Lay Navigator-Led Advance Care Planning Conversations.患者非专业导航员主导的预先护理计划对话的实施与影响
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):682-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.012. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
10
Clinicians' Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients With CKD in Australia: An Interview Study.澳大利亚慢性肾脏病患者预先医疗照护计划的临床医生观点:一项访谈研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Sep;70(3):315-323. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.023. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of care home staff in the delivery of heart failure care: a grounded theory.养老院工作人员提供心力衰竭护理的经验:一项扎根理论研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06079-1.
2
Post-Acute Transition to Home With Supportive Care (PATHS): A Novel Nurse Practitioner-Led Telehealth Intervention to Improve End-of-Life Oncology Care.急性后期过渡到居家支持性护理(PATHS):一种由执业护士主导的新型远程医疗干预措施,旨在改善临终肿瘤护理。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 May;69(5):496-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance care planning: It is time to rethink our goals.预先护理计划:是时候重新思考我们的目标了。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Dec;71(12):3963-3966. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18511. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Turning It Over to God: African American Assisted Living Residents' End-of-Life Preferences and Advance Care Planning.交托给上帝:非裔美国人辅助生活居民的临终偏好和预先护理计划。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Oct 9;78(10):1747-1755. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad100.
3
How does ethnicity affect presence of advance care planning in care records for individuals with advanced disease? A mixed-methods systematic review.种族如何影响晚期疾病患者护理记录中预先护理计划的存在?一项混合方法系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Apr 17;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01168-7.
4
"We've Got to Bring Information to Where People Are Comfortable": Community-Based Advance Care Planning with the Black Community.“我们必须将信息带给人们感到舒适的地方”:与黑人社区合作进行基于社区的预先医疗照护计划。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(11):2478-2485. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08134-2. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
5
The care planning umbrella: The evolution of advance care planning.护理计划总览:预先护理计划的演变
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2350-2356. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18287. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
6
Advance care planning among African Americans: A review and synthesis of theory application.非裔美国人的临终关怀规划:理论应用的回顾与综合
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Feb;21(1):118-126. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001863.
7
Older adults in the USA with limited English proficiency have high rates of intensive end-of-life care and low rates of palliative care and advance care planning.在美国,英语水平有限的老年人接受强化临终护理的比例很高,而接受姑息治疗和预先护理规划的比例很低。
Evid Based Nurs. 2023 Jul;26(3):116. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103593. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
8
"Advocating for what we need": A CBPR approach to advance care planning in the Latinx older adult community.倡导我们所需的:应用 CBPR 方法推进拉丁裔老年群体的预先护理计划。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Aug;71(8):2601-2614. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18236. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
The Association of Chinese Ethnicity and Language Preference with Advance Directive Completion Among Older Patients in an Integrated Health System.中文族群和语言偏好与综合卫生系统中老年患者预立医疗指示完成情况的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1137-1142. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07911-9. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
10
Acceptability of a Serious Illness Conversation Guide to Black Americans: Results from a focus group and oncology pilot study.美国黑人严重疾病对话指南的可接受性:焦点小组和肿瘤学初步研究的结果。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Oct;21(5):788-797. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522001298.

边缘化群体对预先医疗照护计划的看法:愿意参与但面临阻碍。

Advance care planning as perceived by marginalized populations: Willing to engage and facing obstacles.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0301426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301426. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301426
PMID:38557983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10984538/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health disparities exist in end-of-life (EOL) care. Individuals and communities that are marginalized due to their race, ethnicity, income, geographic location, language, or cultural background experience systemic barriers to access and receive lower quality EOL care. Advance care planning (ACP) prepares patients and their caregivers for EOL decision-making for the purpose of promoting high-quality EOL care. Low engagement in ACP among marginalized populations is thought to have contributed to disparity in EOL care. To advance health equity and deliver care that aligns with the goals and values of each individual, there is a need to improve ACP for marginalized populations.

AIM

To describe how patients from marginalized populations experience and perceive ACP.

METHODS

We used an interpretive phenomenological approach with semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were recruited from four primary care clinics and one nursing home in a US Pacific Northwest city. Thirty patients from marginalized populations with serious illness participated in individual interviews between January and December 2021. Participants were asked to describe their experiences and perceptions about ACP during the interviews.

RESULTS

The mean age of 30 participants was 69.5; 19 (63%) were women; 12 (40%) identified as Asian/Pacific Islanders, 10 (33%) as Black; and 9 (30%) were non-native English speakers. Our three key findings were: 1) patients from marginalized populations are willing to engage in ACP; 2) there were multiple obstacles to engaging in ACP; and 3) meaningful ACP conversations could happen when clinicians listen. Although participants from marginalized populations were willing to engage in ACP, a fragmented and restrictive healthcare system and clinicians' biased behaviors or lack of interest in knowing their patients were obstacles. Participants who felt their clinicians took time and listened were encouraged to engage in ACP.

CONCLUSION

Patients from marginalized populations are willing to engage in ACP conversations despite a common belief otherwise. However, obstacles to meaningful ACP conversations with healthcare providers exist. Clinicians need to be aware of these obstacles and listen to build trust and engage marginalized patients in mutually meaningful ACP conversations.

摘要

背景

在临终关怀(EOL)中存在健康差距。由于种族、民族、收入、地理位置、语言或文化背景等原因而处于边缘地位的个人和社区,在获得和接受高质量 EOL 护理方面面临着系统性障碍。预先医疗指示(ACP)为患者及其护理人员制定 EOL 决策,目的是促进高质量的 EOL 护理。边缘化人群中低参与 ACP 被认为是 EOL 护理差异的原因之一。为了促进健康公平并提供符合每个个体目标和价值观的护理,需要改善边缘化人群的 ACP。

目的

描述边缘化人群的患者如何体验和感知 ACP。

方法

我们使用解释性现象学方法进行半结构化定性访谈。参与者是从美国太平洋西北地区一个城市的四家初级保健诊所和一家疗养院招募的。2021 年 1 月至 12 月期间,30 名患有严重疾病的边缘化人群患者参加了个人访谈。在访谈中,参与者被要求描述他们对 ACP 的经验和看法。

结果

30 名参与者的平均年龄为 69.5 岁;19 名(63%)为女性;12 名(40%)为亚裔/太平洋岛民,10 名(33%)为黑人;9 名(30%)为非英语母语者。我们的三个主要发现是:1)边缘化人群的患者愿意参与 ACP;2)参与 ACP 存在多种障碍;3)当临床医生倾听时,有意义的 ACP 对话是可以进行的。尽管边缘化人群的患者愿意参与 ACP,但零碎和限制的医疗保健系统以及临床医生的偏见行为或缺乏了解患者的兴趣,都是障碍。那些觉得他们的临床医生花时间倾听的患者,会受到鼓励去参与 ACP。

结论

尽管普遍认为边缘化人群的患者不愿意参与 ACP 对话,但他们愿意参与 ACP 对话。然而,与医疗保健提供者进行有意义的 ACP 对话存在障碍。临床医生需要意识到这些障碍,并倾听,以建立信任并使边缘化患者参与到有共同意义的 ACP 对话中。