Harrison Neil R, Woodhouse Rob
Department of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK.
Cogn Process. 2016 May;17(2):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0749-6. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Previous research has demonstrated that threatening, compared to neutral pictures, can bias attention towards non-emotional auditory targets. Here we investigated which subcomponents of attention contributed to the influence of emotional visual stimuli on auditory spatial attention. Participants indicated the location of an auditory target, after brief (250 ms) presentation of a spatially non-predictive peripheral visual cue. Responses to targets were faster at the location of the preceding visual cue, compared to at the opposite location (cue validity effect). The cue validity effect was larger for targets following pleasant and unpleasant cues compared to neutral cues, for right-sided targets. For unpleasant cues, the crossmodal cue validity effect was driven by delayed attentional disengagement, and for pleasant cues, it was driven by enhanced engagement. We conclude that both pleasant and unpleasant visual cues influence the distribution of attention across modalities and that the associated attentional mechanisms depend on the valence of the visual cue.
先前的研究表明,与中性图片相比,具有威胁性的图片会使注意力偏向非情感性听觉目标。在此,我们研究了注意力的哪些子成分促成了情感视觉刺激对听觉空间注意力的影响。参与者在短暂(250毫秒)呈现空间上无预测性的外周视觉线索后,指出听觉目标的位置。与相反位置相比,在前一个视觉线索位置对目标的反应更快(线索有效性效应)。对于右侧目标,与中性线索相比,愉悦和不悦线索之后的目标的线索有效性效应更大。对于不悦线索,跨模态线索有效性效应是由注意力脱离延迟驱动的,而对于愉悦线索,则是由注意力增强参与驱动的。我们得出结论,愉悦和不悦的视觉线索都会影响跨模态的注意力分配,并且相关的注意力机制取决于视觉线索的效价。