Horowitz A M, Suomi J D, Peterson J K, Lyman B A
J Public Health Dent. 1977 Summer;37(3):180-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1977.tb02897.x.
After two school years of a supervised daily plaque-removal program in school, children in the treatment group showed a significant reduction in plaque and gingival inflammation scores compared with children in the control group. However, differences between groups in terms of plaque and gingivitis scores virtually disappeared during the summer vacation. The increment of dental caries was lower in the treatment group than in the control group, but the reduction, which averaged about 20 percent, was not statistically significant either for teeth or for surfaces. Although the 24-month findings of the present study indicate some degree of success in reducing plaque and gingivitis and a marginal effect in reducing the incidence of dental caries among children who engaged in daily, supervised plaque-removal in school, obvious drawbacks limit the value of this regimen.
在学校进行了两年有监督的每日牙菌斑清除计划后,与对照组儿童相比,治疗组儿童的牙菌斑和牙龈炎症评分显著降低。然而,在暑假期间,两组在牙菌斑和牙龈炎评分方面的差异几乎消失。治疗组龋齿的增加低于对照组,但平均约20%的降低在牙齿或牙面方面也没有统计学意义。尽管本研究的24个月结果表明,对于在学校每日接受监督进行牙菌斑清除的儿童,在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面取得了一定程度的成功,在降低龋齿发病率方面有一定边际效应,但明显的缺点限制了该方案的价值。