Kemper Peter F, de Bruijne Martine, van Dyck Cathy, So Ralph L, Tangkau Peter, Wagner Cordula
Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Organisational Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):577-87. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003994. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
There is a growing awareness today that adverse events in the intensive care unit (ICU) are more often caused by problems related to non-technical skills than by a lack of technical, or clinical, expertise. Team training, such as crew resource management (CRM), aims to improve these non-technical skills. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of CRM in the ICU.
Six ICUs participated in a paired controlled trial, with one pretest and two post-test measurements (after 3 and 12 months). Three ICUs received CRM training and were compared with a matched control unit. The 2-day classroom-based training was delivered to multidisciplinary groups (ie, ICU physicians, nurses, managers). All levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework were assessed using a mixed method design, including questionnaires, observations and routinely administered patient outcome data.
Level I-reaction: participants were very positive directly after the training. Level II-learning: attitudes towards behaviour aimed at optimising situational awareness were relatively high at baseline and remained stable. Level III-behaviour: self-reported behaviour aimed at optimising situational awareness improved in the intervention group. No changes were found in observed explicit professional oral communication. Level IV-organisation: patient outcomes were unaffected. Error management culture and job satisfaction improved in the intervention group. Patient safety culture improved in both control and intervention units.
We can conclude that CRM, as delivered in the present study, does not change behaviour or patient outcomes by itself, yet changes how participants think about errors and risks. This indicates that CRM requires a combination with other initiatives in order to improve clinical outcomes.
如今,人们越来越意识到重症监护病房(ICU)中的不良事件更多是由与非技术技能相关的问题引起的,而非技术或临床专业知识的缺乏。团队培训,如机组资源管理(CRM),旨在提高这些非技术技能。本研究评估了CRM在ICU中的有效性。
六个ICU参与了一项配对对照试验,进行一次预测试和两次后测试(分别在3个月和12个月后)。三个ICU接受了CRM培训,并与一个匹配的对照单位进行比较。为期两天的基于课堂的培训面向多学科团队(即ICU医生、护士、管理人员)。使用混合方法设计评估了柯克帕特里克评估框架的所有级别,包括问卷调查、观察和常规收集的患者结局数据。
一级反应:培训结束后,参与者的反应非常积极。二级学习:在基线时,对旨在优化态势感知的行为的态度相对较高,并保持稳定。三级行为:干预组中,自我报告的旨在优化态势感知的行为有所改善。在观察到的明确的专业口头沟通方面未发现变化。四级组织:患者结局未受影响。干预组的差错管理文化和工作满意度有所改善。对照组和干预组的患者安全文化均有所改善。
我们可以得出结论,本研究中实施的CRM本身不会改变行为或患者结局,但会改变参与者对差错和风险的看法。这表明CRM需要与其他举措相结合,以改善临床结局。