• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析与手术不良事件相关的人为绩效缺陷。

Analysis of Human Performance Deficiencies Associated With Surgical Adverse Events.

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e198067. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8067.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8067
PMID:31365107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6669897/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Potentially preventable adverse events remain a formidable cause of patient harm and health care expenditure despite advances in systems-based risk-reduction strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and describe the incidence of human performance deficiencies (HPDs) during the provision of surgical care to identify opportunities to enhance patient safety.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study used a new taxonomy to inform the development and implementation of an HPD classifier tool to categorize HPDs into errors associated with cognitive, technical, and team dynamic functions. The HPD classifier tool was then used to concurrently analyze surgical adverse events in 3 adult hospital affiliates-a level I municipal trauma center, a quaternary care university hospital, and a US Veterans Administration hospital-from January 2, 2018, to June 30, 2018. Surgical trainees presented data describing all adverse events associated with surgical services at weekly hospital-based morbidity and mortality conferences. Adverse events and HPDs were classified in discussion with attending faculty and residents. Data were analyzed from July 9, 2018, to December 23, 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The incidence and primary and secondary causes of HPDs were classified using an HPD classifier tool.

RESULTS

A total of 188 adverse events were recorded, including 182 adverse events (96.8%) among 5365 patients who underwent surgical operations and 6 adverse events (3.2%) among patients undergoing nonoperative treatment. Among these 188 adverse events, 106 (56.4%) were associated with HPDs. Among these 106 HPD adverse events, a total of 192 HPDs (mean [SD], 1.8 [0.9] HPDs per HPD event) were identified. Human performance deficiencies were categorized as execution (98 HPDs [51.0%]), planning or problem solving (55 HPDs [28.6%]), communication (24 HPDs [12.5%]), teamwork (9 HPDs [4.7%]), and rules violation (6 HPDs [3.1%]). Human performance deficiencies most commonly presented as cognitive errors in execution of care or in case planning or problem solving (99 of 192 HPDs [51.6%]). In contrast, technical execution errors without other associated HPDs were observed in 20 of 192 HPDs (10.4%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Human performance deficiencies were identified in more than half of adverse events, most commonly associated with cognitive error in the execution of care. These data provide a framework and impetus for new quality improvement initiatives incorporating cognitive training to mitigate human error in surgery.

摘要

重要性

尽管在基于系统的降低风险策略方面取得了进展,但潜在可预防的不良事件仍然是造成患者伤害和医疗支出的一个严重原因。

目的

分析和描述手术护理过程中人为绩效缺陷(HPD)的发生率,以确定增强患者安全性的机会。

设计、设置和参与者:本质量改进研究使用了一种新的分类法来制定和实施 HPD 分类器工具,以将 HPD 归类为与认知、技术和团队动态功能相关的错误。然后,使用 HPD 分类器工具同时分析 2018 年 1 月 2 日至 6 月 30 日期间 3 家成人医院分院(一家 I 级市创伤中心、一家四级护理大学医院和一家美国退伍军人管理局医院)的外科不良事件。外科受训人员每周在医院举办的发病率和死亡率会议上介绍与外科服务相关的所有不良事件的数据。在与主治医生和住院医师的讨论中对不良事件和 HPD 进行分类。数据于 2018 年 7 月 9 日至 12 月 23 日进行分析。

主要结果和措施

使用 HPD 分类器工具对 HPD 的发生率和主要及次要原因进行分类。

结果

共记录了 188 起不良事件,其中 5365 名接受手术的患者中有 182 起(96.8%)不良事件和 6 名接受非手术治疗的患者中有 6 起(3.2%)不良事件。在这 188 起不良事件中,有 106 起(56.4%)与 HPD 有关。在这 106 起 HPD 不良事件中,共发现 192 起 HPD(平均[SD]每起 HPD 事件 1.8[0.9]起 HPD)。人为绩效缺陷分为执行(98 起 HPD[51.0%])、计划或解决问题(55 起 HPD[28.6%])、沟通(24 起 HPD[12.5%])、团队合作(9 起 HPD[4.7%])和违反规则(6 起 HPD[3.1%])。人为绩效缺陷最常见的表现为护理执行或病例计划或解决问题中的认知错误(192 起 HPD 中的 99 起[51.6%])。相比之下,在 192 起 HPD 中观察到了 20 起没有其他相关 HPD 的技术执行错误(10.4%)。

结论和相关性

在超过一半的不良事件中发现了人为绩效缺陷,最常见的是与护理执行中的认知错误有关。这些数据为新的质量改进计划提供了框架和动力,该计划纳入认知训练以减轻手术中的人为错误。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Human Performance Deficiencies Associated With Surgical Adverse Events.分析与手术不良事件相关的人为绩效缺陷。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e198067. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8067.
2
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
3
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room.手术室内外不正确的外科手术程序。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1028-34. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.126.
4
Using a structured morbidity and mortality meeting to understand the contribution of human error to adverse surgical events in a South African regional hospital.利用结构化的发病率和死亡率会议来了解人为失误对南非一家地区医院不良手术事件的影响。
S Afr J Surg. 2013 Oct 22;51(4):122-6. doi: 10.7196/sajs.1537.
5
Analysis of Surgical Adverse Events at a Major University Hospital in South Africa.南非一大学附属医院手术不良事件分析。
World J Surg. 2019 Sep;43(9):2117-2122. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05008-9.
6
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room: a follow-up report.手术室内外的错误手术操作:一份随访报告。
Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1235-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.171. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
7
Identifying and addressing preventable process errors in trauma care.识别和解决创伤护理中的可预防流程错误。
World J Surg. 2013 Apr;37(4):752-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1917-9.
8
Sustainability and long-term effectiveness of the WHO surgical safety checklist combined with pulse oximetry in a resource-limited setting: two-year update from Moldova.在资源有限的环境下,世界卫生组织手术安全检查表与脉搏血氧饱和度监测相结合的可持续性和长期效果:来自摩尔多瓦的两年更新。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):473-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3848.
9
Surgical adverse events: a systematic review.手术不良事件:系统评价。
Am J Surg. 2013 Aug;206(2):253-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 May 1.
10
Association of Coworker Reports About Unprofessional Behavior by Surgeons With Surgical Complications in Their Patients.同事报告外科医生不专业行为与患者手术并发症的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):828-834. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1738.

引用本文的文献

1
The contribution of surgical data science to identifying intraoperative human errors and adverse events in elective liver surgery: A preliminary study.手术数据科学在识别择期肝脏手术术中人为失误和不良事件中的作用:一项初步研究。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2025 Aug 31;29(3):279-285. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.25-089. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Dynamic key vascular anatomy dataset for D2 lymph node dissection during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.腹腔镜胃癌手术中D2淋巴结清扫的动态关键血管解剖数据集
Sci Data. 2025 May 29;12(1):903. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05255-7.
3
Deep learning-based intraoperative visual guidance model for ureter identification in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Scaling Safety: The South Carolina Surgical Safety Checklist Experience.规模安全:南卡罗来纳州手术安全清单经验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1779-1786. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0717.
2
Chasing the 6-sigma: Drawing lessons from the cockpit culture.追求六西格玛:从驾驶舱文化中汲取经验教训。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(2):690-696.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.097. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
3
Exercise Intensity-Dependent Effects on Cognitive Control Function during and after Acute Treadmill Running in Young Healthy Adults.
基于深度学习的腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术中输尿管识别的术中视觉引导模型
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11694-5.
4
Artificial intelligence in surgical medicine: a brief review.外科学中的人工智能:简要综述。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 28;87(4):2180-2186. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003115. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Preoperative educational briefings: systematic review and novel evidence-based framework.术前教育简报:系统评价与基于证据的新型框架
Br J Surg. 2025 Mar 4;112(3). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf001.
6
Prediction and stratification for the surgical adverse events after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A two-center retrospective study.微创食管切除术后手术不良事件的预测与分层:一项双中心回顾性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 21;31(3):101041. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.101041.
7
Exploring medical error taxonomies and human factors in simulation-based healthcare education.探索基于模拟的医疗保健教育中的医疗差错分类法和人为因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0317128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317128. eCollection 2025.
8
Artificial intelligence-enhanced navigation for nerve recognition and surgical education in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.人工智能增强导航在腹腔镜结直肠手术中的神经识别与手术教育应用
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1388-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11489-0. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
9
Artificial intelligence assisted real-time recognition of intra-abdominal metastasis during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.人工智能辅助在腹腔镜胃癌手术中实时识别腹腔内转移
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jan 5;8(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01372-6.
10
AI-based visualization of loose connective tissue as a dissectable layer in gastrointestinal surgery.基于人工智能的疏松结缔组织可视化,作为胃肠外科手术中的可解剖层。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84044-5.
年轻健康成年人急性跑步机跑步期间及之后运动强度对认知控制功能的依赖性影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 21;8:406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00406. eCollection 2017.
4
Cluster randomized trial to evaluate the impact of team training on surgical outcomes.评价团队培训对手术结果影响的整群随机试验。
Br J Surg. 2016 Dec;103(13):1804-1814. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10295. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Investigating Adverse Event Free Admissions in Medicare Inpatients as a Patient Safety Indicator.将医疗保险住院患者的无不良事件入院情况作为患者安全指标进行调查。
Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):910-915. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001792.
6
Crew resource management training in the intensive care unit. A multisite controlled before-after study.重症监护病房中的医护人员资源管理培训。一项多中心前后对照研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):577-87. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003994. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
7
Projections to achieve minimum surgical rate threshold: an observational study.实现最低手术率阈值的预测:一项观察性研究。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 27;385 Suppl 2:S14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60809-1. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
8
Improved Surgical Outcomes for ACS NSQIP Hospitals Over Time: Evaluation of Hospital Cohorts With up to 8 Years of Participation.随着时间推移,美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)医院的手术结果得到改善:对参与长达8年的医院队列进行评估。
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):267-73. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001192.
9
Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.医院参与质量报告项目与医疗保险受益人的手术结果及支出之间的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):496-504. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.25.
10
What do we know about the safe surgery checklist now?我们现在对安全手术检查表了解多少?
Ann Surg. 2015 May;261(5):829-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001144.