Tal Idan, Abeles Moshe
Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel; and
Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel; and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;115(4):1810-20. doi: 10.1152/jn.00956.2015. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
The precision in space and time of interactions among multiple cortical sites was evaluated by examining repeating precise spatiotemporal patterns of instances in which cortical currents showed brief amplitude undulations. The amplitudes of the cortical current dipoles were estimated by applying a variant of synthetic aperture magnetometry to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings of subjects tapping to metric auditory rhythms of drum beats. Brief amplitude undulations were detected in the currents by template matching at a rate of 2-3 per second. Their timing was treated as point processes, and precise spatiotemporal patterns were searched for. By randomly teetering these point processes within a time window W, we estimated the accuracy of the timing of these brief amplitude undulations and compared the results with those obtained by applying the same analysis to traces composed of random numbers. The results demonstrated that the timing accuracy of patterns was better than 3 ms. Successful classification of two different cognitive processes based on these patterns suggests that at least some of the repeating patterns are specific to a cognitive process.
通过检查皮质电流显示出短暂幅度波动的实例的重复精确时空模式,评估了多个皮质位点之间相互作用在空间和时间上的精确性。通过将合成孔径磁测法的一种变体应用于受试者跟随鼓点的公制听觉节奏敲击时的脑磁图(MEG)记录,估计皮质电流偶极子的幅度。通过模板匹配以每秒2 - 3次的速率在电流中检测到短暂的幅度波动。它们的时间被视为点过程,并搜索精确的时空模式。通过在时间窗口W内随机摆动这些点过程,我们估计了这些短暂幅度波动的时间准确性,并将结果与对由随机数组成的轨迹进行相同分析所获得的结果进行比较。结果表明,模式的时间准确性优于3毫秒。基于这些模式对两种不同认知过程的成功分类表明,至少一些重复模式特定于某个认知过程。