Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与耻骨后前列腺癌根治术后急性肾损伤的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析。

Comparison of Acute Kidney Injury After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

作者信息

Joo Eun-Young, Moon Yeon-Jin, Yoon Syn-Hae, Chin Ji-Hyun, Hwang Jai-Hyun, Kim Young-Kug

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(5):e2650. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002650.

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with extended hospital stay, a high risk of progressive chronic kidney diseases, and increased mortality. Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy are at increased risk of AKI because of intraoperative bleeding, obstructive uropathy, older age, and preexisting chronic kidney disease. In particular, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), which is in increasing demand as an alternative surgical option for retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), is associated with postoperative renal dysfunction because pneumoperitoneum during RALP can decrease cardiac output and renal perfusion. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative AKI between RRP and RALP.We included 1340 patients who underwent RRP (n = 370) or RALP (n = 970) between 2013 and 2014. Demographics, cancer-related data, and perioperative laboratory data were evaluated. Postoperative AKI was determined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Operation and anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, amounts of administered fluids and transfused packed red blood cells, and the lengths of the postoperative intensive care unit and hospital stays were evaluated. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce the influence of possible confounding variables and adjust for intergroup differences between the RRP and RALP groups.After performing 1:1 propensity score matching, the RRP and RALP groups included 307 patients, respectively. The operation time and anesthesia time in RALP were significantly longer than in the RRP group (both P < 0.001). However, the estimated blood loss and amount of administered fluids in RALP were significantly lower than in RRP (both P < 0.001). Also, RALP demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of transfusion and smaller amount of transfused packed red blood cells than RRP (both P < 0.001). Importantly, the incidence of AKI in RALP was significantly lower than in RRP (5.5% vs 10.4%; P = 0.044). Furthermore, the length of hospital stay in RALP was also significantly shorter (P < 0.001).The incidence of AKI after RALP is significantly lower than after RRP. RALP can therefore be a better surgical option than RRP in terms of decreasing the frequency of postoperative AKI.

摘要

急性肾损伤(AKI)与住院时间延长、进展为慢性肾病的高风险以及死亡率增加相关。接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者发生AKI的风险增加,原因包括术中出血、梗阻性尿路病、年龄较大以及既往存在慢性肾病。特别是,机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)作为耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)的替代手术选择,需求日益增加,它与术后肾功能障碍相关,因为RALP期间的气腹可降低心输出量和肾灌注。本研究的目的是比较RRP和RALP术后AKI的发生率。

我们纳入了2013年至2014年间接受RRP(n = 370)或RALP(n = 970)的1340例患者。评估了人口统计学、癌症相关数据和围手术期实验室数据。根据改善全球肾脏病预后组织(KDIGO)标准确定术后AKI。评估了手术和麻醉时间、估计失血量、补液量和输注的浓缩红细胞量,以及术后重症监护病房住院时间和住院总时长。进行倾向评分匹配分析以减少可能的混杂变量的影响,并调整RRP组和RALP组之间的组间差异。

在进行1:1倾向评分匹配后,RRP组和RALP组分别纳入307例患者。RALP的手术时间和麻醉时间显著长于RRP组(均P < 0.001)。然而,RALP的估计失血量和补液量显著低于RRP(均P < 0.001)。此外,RALP的输血发生率显著低于RRP,输注的浓缩红细胞量也少于RRP(均P < 0.001)。重要的是,RALP的AKI发生率显著低于RRP(5.5%对10.4%;P = 0.044)。此外,RALP的住院时间也显著更短(P < 0.001)。

RALP术后AKI的发生率显著低于RRP术后。因此,就降低术后AKI的发生率而言,RALP可能是比RRP更好的手术选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/321c/4748903/312959994e4b/medi-95-e2650-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验