Zavala Baltazar, Tan Huiling, Little Simon, Ashkan Keyoumars, Green Alexander L, Aziz Tipu, Foltynie Thomas, Zrinzo Ludvic, Zaghloul Kareem, Brown Peter
University of Oxford John Radcliffe Hospital.
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;28(6):811-25. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00934. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
The switch between automatic action selection and more controlled forms of decision-making is a dynamic process thought to involve both cortical and subcortical structures. During sensory conflict, medial pFC oscillations in the theta band (<8 Hz) drive those of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), and this is thought to increase the threshold of evidence needed for one competing response to be selected over another. Here, we were interested in testing whether STN activity is also altered by the rate at which evidence is presented during a congruent dot motion task absent of any explicit sensory conflict. By having a series of randomly moving dots gradually transform to congruent motion at three different rates (slow, medium, fast), we were able to show that a slower rate increased the time it took participants to make a response but did not alter the total amount of evidence that was integrated before the response. Notably, this resulted in a decision being made with a lower amount of instantaneous evidence during the slow and medium trials. Consistent with the idea that medial pFC-STN activity is involved in executing cognitive control, the higher levels of ambiguity during these trials were associated with increased theta band synchrony between the cortex and the STN, with the cortical oscillations Granger-causal to those of the STN. These results further confirm the involvement of the STN in decision-making and suggest that the disruption of this network may underlie some of the unwanted cognitive deficits associated with STN deep brain stimulation.
自动动作选择与更具控制性的决策形式之间的转换是一个动态过程,被认为涉及皮层和皮层下结构。在感觉冲突期间,内侧前额叶皮层(pFC)的θ频段(<8 Hz)振荡驱动丘脑底核(STN)的振荡,这被认为会提高一种竞争反应相对于另一种竞争反应被选择所需的证据阈值。在此,我们感兴趣的是测试在没有任何明确感觉冲突的同向点运动任务中,证据呈现的速率是否也会改变STN的活动。通过让一系列随机移动的点以三种不同速率(慢、中、快)逐渐转变为同向运动,我们能够表明,较慢的速率会增加参与者做出反应所需的时间,但不会改变反应前整合的证据总量。值得注意的是,这导致在慢速率和中速率试验期间,决策是基于较少的即时证据做出的。与内侧pFC-STN活动参与执行认知控制的观点一致,这些试验中较高水平的模糊性与皮层和STN之间θ频段同步性增加有关,皮层振荡对STN振荡具有格兰杰因果关系。这些结果进一步证实了STN参与决策,并表明该网络的破坏可能是与STN深部脑刺激相关的一些不必要认知缺陷的基础。