Suppr超能文献

加拿大社区居民中轮椅和踏板车的使用 prevalence(此处 prevalence 直接保留英文,因为它在医学等领域有特定专业含义,暂未找到完全对应的中文术语,可根据上下文灵活处理,比如“患病率”等,但这里直接保留更合适)情况

Prevalence of Wheelchair and Scooter Use Among Community-Dwelling Canadians.

作者信息

Smith Emma M, Giesbrecht Edward M, Mortenson W Ben, Miller William C

机构信息

E.M. Smith, MScOT, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; GF Strong Rehabilitation Research Lab, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

E.M. Giesbrecht, BMR(OT), Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia; GF Strong Rehabilitation Research Lab; Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; and International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;96(8):1135-42. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150574. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobility impairments are the third leading cause of disability for community-dwelling Canadians. Wheelchairs and scooters help compensate for these challenges. There are limited data within the last decade estimating the prevalence of wheelchair and scooter use in Canada.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were: (1) to estimate the prevalence of wheelchair and scooter use in Canada and (2) to explore relevant demographic characteristics of wheelchair and scooter users.

DESIGN

This study was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional national survey.

METHODS

The Canadian Survey on Disability (2012) collected data on wheelchair and scooter use from community-dwelling individuals aged 15 years and over with a self-identified activity limitation on the National Household Survey. Prevalence estimates were calculated as weighted frequencies, with cross-tabulations to determine the number of wheelchair and scooter users in Canada, by province, and demographic characteristics (ie, age, sex) and bootstrapping to estimate the variance of all point estimates.

RESULTS

There were approximately 288,800 community-dwelling wheelchair and scooter users aged 15 years and over, representing 1.0% of the Canadian population. The sample included 197,560 manual wheelchair users, 42,360 powered wheelchair users, and 108,550 scooter users. Wheelchair and scooter users were predominantly women, with a mean age of 65 years. Approximately 50,620 individuals used a combination of 2 different types of devices.

LIMITATIONS

The results are representative of individuals living in the community in Canada and exclude individuals in residential or group-based settings; estimates do not represent the true population prevalence.

CONCLUSION

This analysis is the first in more than 10 years to provide a prevalence estimate and description of wheelchair and scooter users in Canada. Since 2004, there has been an increase in the proportion of the population who use wheelchairs and scooters, likely related to an aging Canadian population. These new prevalence data have potential to inform policy, research, and clinical practice.

摘要

背景

行动障碍是加拿大社区居民残疾的第三大主要原因。轮椅和踏板车有助于应对这些挑战。在过去十年中,估算加拿大轮椅和踏板车使用 prevalence 的数据有限。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)估算加拿大轮椅和踏板车的使用 prevalence;(2)探讨轮椅和踏板车使用者的相关人口统计学特征。

设计

本研究是对一项全国性横断面调查的二次分析。

方法

《加拿大残疾调查》(2012 年)从 15 岁及以上、在全国家庭调查中自我认定有活动受限的社区居民那里收集了关于轮椅和踏板车使用的数据。prevalence 估计值以加权频率计算,通过交叉列表确定加拿大轮椅和踏板车使用者的数量、按省份以及人口统计学特征(即年龄、性别),并采用自抽样法估计所有点估计值的方差。

结果

15 岁及以上的社区轮椅和踏板车使用者约有 288,800 人,占加拿大人口的 1.0%。样本包括 197,560 名手动轮椅使用者、42,360 名电动轮椅使用者和 108,550 名踏板车使用者。轮椅和踏板车使用者以女性为主,平均年龄为 65 岁。约 50,620 人使用了两种不同类型设备的组合。

局限性

结果仅代表加拿大社区居民,不包括居住在机构或集体环境中的人;估计值并不代表真实的人群 prevalence。

结论

该分析是十多年来首次对加拿大轮椅和踏板车使用者的 prevalence 进行估计和描述。自 2004 年以来,使用轮椅和踏板车的人口比例有所增加,这可能与加拿大人口老龄化有关。这些新的 prevalence 数据有可能为政策制定、研究和临床实践提供参考。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Wheelchair and Scooter Use Among Community-Dwelling Canadians.
Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;96(8):1135-42. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150574. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
3
A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):411-9. doi: 10.3109/17483101003793412.
6
Correlates of self-reported Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire scores of new users of mobility scooters: a cross-sectional study.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul;18(5):483-490. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1874065. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Predictors of type of powered mobility aid for patients: a retrospective study in a Singapore acute hospital.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Aug;19(6):2271-2278. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2279641. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
8
Adult Scandinavians' use of powered scooters: user satisfaction, frequency of use, and prediction of daily use.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Apr;13(3):212-219. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1306589. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
9
Health, Personal, and Environmental Predictors of Wheelchair-Use Confidence in Adult Wheelchair Users.
Phys Ther. 2015 Oct;95(10):1365-73. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140537. Epub 2015 May 7.
10
Barriers to wheelchair use in the winter.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the Standardized Navigation Of Winter Mobility & Accessibility Network (SNOWMAN) course.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 May 9;5:1330507. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1330507. eCollection 2024.
2
Powered mobility device use in residential aged care: a retrospective audit of incidents and injuries.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 11;23(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04073-z.
3
Comparing the usability of a virtual reality manual wheelchair simulator in two display conditions.
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022 Feb 24;9:20556683211067174. doi: 10.1177/20556683211067174. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Relationships between Cognitive Functioning and Powered Mobility Device Use: A Scoping Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12467. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312467.
7
Impact of the TEAM Wheels eHealth manual wheelchair training program: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258509. eCollection 2021.
8
Augmented feedback for manual wheelchair propulsion technique training in a virtual reality simulator.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Sep 21;18(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00936-x.
10
Musculoskeletal Pain Due to Wheelchair Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):973-984. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00294-5. Epub 2021 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
A cross-sectional study examining multiple mobility device use and fall status among middle-aged and older adults with multiple sclerosis.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Jan;9(1):12-6. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.782578. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
2
Multiple sclerosis and mobility-related assistive technology: systematic review of literature.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(3):213-23. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.07.0096.
3
A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):411-9. doi: 10.3109/17483101003793412.
4
Wheelchair repairs, breakdown, and adverse consequences for people with traumatic spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2034-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.020.
6
Distribution and cost of wheelchairs and scooters provided by Veterans Health Administration.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(4):581-92. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.10.0136.
7
Manual wheelchairs: Research and innovation in rehabilitation, sports, daily life and health.
Med Eng Phys. 2006 Nov;28(9):905-15. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
9
Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation.
J Rehabil Med. 2004 Mar;36(2):70-7. doi: 10.1080/16501970310017432.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验