Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚化学农药的使用:关于三种耕作系统中农民和农场工人知识、态度与实践的横断面比较研究

Use of Chemical Pesticides in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Farmers and Farm Workers in Three Farming Systems.

作者信息

Negatu Beyene, Kromhout Hans, Mekonnen Yalemtshay, Vermeulen Roel

机构信息

1.Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2.Pesticide Risk Reduction Project Ethiopia, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;

1.Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands;

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Jun;60(5):551-66. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew004. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Abstract

Chemical pesticides, regardless of their inherent hazard, are used intensively in the fast changing agricultural sector of Ethiopia. We conducted a cross-sectional pesticide Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) survey among 601 farmers and farm workers (applicators and re-entry workers) in three farming systems [large-scale closed greenhouses (LSGH), large-scale open farms (LSOF), and small-scale irrigated farms (SSIF)]. Main observations were that 85% of workers did not attain any pesticide-related training, 81% were not aware of modern alternatives for chemical pesticides, 10% used a full set of personal protective equipment, and 62% did not usually bath or shower after work. Among applicators pesticide training attendance was highest in LSGH (35%) and was lowest in SSIF (4%). None of the female re-entry farm workers had received pesticide-related training. Personal protective equipment use was twice as high among pesticide applicators as among re-entry workers (13 versus 7%), while none of the small-scale farm workers used personal protection equipment. Stockpiling and burial of empty pesticide containers and discarding empty pesticide containers in farming fields were reported in both LSOF and by 75% of the farm workers in SSIF. Considerable increment in chemical pesticide usage intensity, illegitimate usages of DDT and Endosulfan on food crops and direct import of pesticides without the formal Ethiopian registration process were also indicated. These results point out a general lack of training and knowledge regarding the safe use of pesticides in all farming systems but especially among small-scale farmers. This in combination with the increase in chemical pesticide usage in the past decade likely results in occupational and environmental health risks. Improved KAP that account for institutional difference among various farming systems and enforcement of regulatory measures including the available occupational and environmental proclamations in Ethiopia are urgently needed.

摘要

化学农药,无论其固有的危害性如何,在埃塞俄比亚快速变化的农业部门中都被大量使用。我们对三种耕作系统[大型封闭式温室(LSGH)、大型开放式农场(LSOF)和小型灌溉农场(SSIF)]中的601名农民和农场工人(施药人员和重新进入作业区的工人)进行了一项关于农药知识、态度和行为(KAP)的横断面调查。主要观察结果是,85%的工人未接受过任何与农药相关的培训,81%的人不知道化学农药的现代替代品,10%的人使用了全套个人防护装备,62%的人下班后通常不洗澡。在施药人员中,大型封闭式温室的农药培训出勤率最高(35%),小型灌溉农场最低(4%)。没有一名女性重新进入作业区的农场工人接受过与农药相关的培训。农药施药人员使用个人防护装备的比例是重新进入作业区工人的两倍(13%对7%),而小型农场工人中没有人使用个人防护装备。大型开放式农场以及75%的小型灌溉农场的农场工人都报告了空农药容器的储存和掩埋情况,以及在农田中丢弃空农药容器的情况。还表明化学农药使用强度大幅增加、在粮食作物上非法使用滴滴涕和硫丹以及在没有经过埃塞俄比亚正式注册程序的情况下直接进口农药。这些结果表明,所有耕作系统,尤其是小规模农民,普遍缺乏关于安全使用农药的培训和知识。这与过去十年化学农药使用量的增加相结合,可能导致职业和环境健康风险。迫切需要改进考虑到不同耕作系统之间制度差异的KAP,并加强监管措施的执行,包括埃塞俄比亚现有的职业和环境公告。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验