Suppr超能文献

贝伐单抗联合替莫唑胺与单纯替莫唑胺作为新辅助治疗用于未切除的胶质母细胞瘤:GENOM 009随机II期试验

Bevacizumab and temozolomide versus temozolomide alone as neoadjuvant treatment in unresected glioblastoma: the GENOM 009 randomized phase II trial.

作者信息

Balana Carmen, De Las Penas Ramon, Sepúlveda Juan Manuel, Gil-Gil Miguel J, Luque Raquel, Gallego Oscar, Carrato Cristina, Sanz Carolina, Reynes Gaspar, Herrero Ana, Ramirez Jose Luis, Pérez-Segura Pedro, Berrocal Alfonso, Vieitez Jose Maria, Garcia Almudena, Vazquez-Estevez Sergio, Peralta Sergi, Fernandez Isaura, Henriquez Ivan, Martinez-Garcia Maria, De la Cruz Juan Jose, Capellades Jaume, Giner Pilar, Villà Salvador

机构信息

Medical Oncology Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera Canyet, s/n, 08916, Badalona, Spain.

Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2016 May;127(3):569-79. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2065-5. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

Abstract

We sought to determine the impact of bevacizumab on reduction of tumor size prior to chemoradiotherapy in unresected glioblastoma patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive temozolomide (TMZ arm) or temozolomide plus bevacizumab (TMZ + BEV arm). In both arms, neoadjuvant treatment was temozolomide (85 mg/m(2), days 1-21, two 28-day cycles), concurrent radiation plus temozolomide, and six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. In the TMZ + BEV arm, bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) was added on days 1 and 15 of each neoadjuvant cycle and on days 1, 15 and 30 of concurrent treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed response to neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the impact on outcome of MGMT methylation in tumor and serum. One hundred and two patients were included; 43 in the TMZ arm and 44 in the TMZ + BEV arm were evaluable for response. Results favored the TMZ + BEV arm in terms of objective response (3 [6.7 %] vs. 11 [22.9 %]; odds ratio 4.2; P = 0.04). PFS and OS were longer in the TMZ + BEV arm, though the difference did not reach statistical significance. MGMT methylation in tumor, but not in serum, was associated with outcome. More patients experienced toxicities in the TMZ + BEV than in the TMZ arm (P = 0.06). The combination of bevacizumab plus temozolomide is more active than temozolomide alone and may well confer benefit in terms of tumor shrinkage in unresected patients albeit at the expense of greater toxicity.

摘要

我们试图确定贝伐单抗对未切除的胶质母细胞瘤患者在放化疗前肿瘤大小缩小的影响。患者按1:1随机分组,分别接受替莫唑胺(替莫唑胺组)或替莫唑胺加贝伐单抗(替莫唑胺 + 贝伐单抗组)。在两组中,新辅助治疗均为替莫唑胺(85mg/m²,第1 - 21天,两个28天周期)同时进行放疗加替莫唑胺,以及六个周期的辅助替莫唑胺治疗。在替莫唑胺 + 贝伐单抗组中,在每个新辅助周期的第1天和第15天以及同步治疗的第1天、第15天和第30天添加贝伐单抗(10mg/kg)。主要终点是研究者评估的对新辅助治疗的反应。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)以及肿瘤和血清中MGMT甲基化对预后的影响。共纳入102例患者;替莫唑胺组43例,替莫唑胺 + 贝伐单抗组44例可评估反应。结果显示,在客观反应方面替莫唑胺 + 贝伐单抗组更优(3例[6.7%]对11例[22.9%];优势比4.2;P = 0.04)。替莫唑胺 + 贝伐单抗组的PFS和OS更长,尽管差异未达到统计学意义。肿瘤中的MGMT甲基化而非血清中的MGMT甲基化与预后相关。替莫唑胺 + 贝伐单抗组比替莫唑胺组有更多患者出现毒性反应(P = 0.06)。贝伐单抗加替莫唑胺的联合治疗比单独使用替莫唑胺更有效,并且在未切除患者的肿瘤缩小方面可能带来益处,尽管代价是更大的毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验