• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗的功能独立性测量:创伤性脑损伤患者的验证性因素分析及天花板效应和地板效应评估

Functional Independence Measure in Iran: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Evaluation of Ceiling and Floor Effects in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

作者信息

Rezaei Sajjad, Dehnadi Moghadam Anoush, Khodadadi Naeima, Rahmatpour Pardis

机构信息

Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran.

Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran.

出版信息

Arch Trauma Res. 2015 Dec 12;4(4):e25363. doi: 10.5812/atr.25363. eCollection 2015 Dec.

DOI:10.5812/atr.25363
PMID:26848469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4733519/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The functional independence measure (FIM) is one of the most important assessment instruments for motor and cognitive dependence in rehabilitation medicine; however, there is little data about its confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and ceiling/floor effects from other countries and also in Iranian patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate a two-factor model (motor and cognitive independence as latent variables) and ceiling/floor effects for FIM in Iranian patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 185 subacute TBI patients were selected from emergency and neurosurgery departments of Poursina Hospital (the largest trauma hospital in northern Iran, Rasht) using the consecutive sampling method and were assessed for functional independence.

RESULTS

The results of this study showed that the floor effect was not observed; however, ceiling effects were observed for the FIM total score and its subscales. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the chi-square/df ratio was 2.8 for the two-factor structure and the fit indices for this structural model including root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.099, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.96, tucker lewis index (TLI) = 0.97, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.97 were close to standard indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ceiling effects should be considered for rehabilitation targets, the two-factor model of FIM (motor and cognitive independence) has an eligible fitness for Iranian patients with TBI.

摘要

背景

功能独立性测量(FIM)是康复医学中评估运动和认知依赖性最重要的评估工具之一;然而,来自其他国家以及伊朗患者中关于其验证性因素分析(CFA)和天花板/地板效应的数据很少。

目的

本研究的目的是评估伊朗创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中FIM的双因素模型(运动和认知独立性作为潜在变量)以及天花板/地板效应。

患者和方法

在这项横断面研究中,采用连续抽样方法从普尔西纳医院(伊朗北部拉什特最大的创伤医院)的急诊科和神经外科选取了185例亚急性TBI患者,并对其功能独立性进行评估。

结果

本研究结果表明未观察到地板效应;然而,观察到FIM总分及其子量表存在天花板效应。验证性因素分析表明,双因素结构的卡方/自由度比为2.8,该结构模型的拟合指数包括近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=0.099、规范拟合指数(NFI)=0.96、塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)=0.97、比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.97,接近标准指数。

结论

尽管在确定康复目标时应考虑天花板效应,但FIM的双因素模型(运动和认知独立性)对伊朗TBI患者具有合适的拟合度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a62/4733519/54e355ddb3dd/atr-04-04-25363-i001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a62/4733519/54e355ddb3dd/atr-04-04-25363-i001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a62/4733519/54e355ddb3dd/atr-04-04-25363-i001.jpg

相似文献

1
Functional Independence Measure in Iran: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Evaluation of Ceiling and Floor Effects in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.伊朗的功能独立性测量:创伤性脑损伤患者的验证性因素分析及天花板效应和地板效应评估
Arch Trauma Res. 2015 Dec 12;4(4):e25363. doi: 10.5812/atr.25363. eCollection 2015 Dec.
2
Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury.在单次脑损伤后的早期住院康复期间使用巴氏指数和功能独立性测量。
Clin Rehabil. 2006 Feb;20(2):153-9. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr917oa.
3
The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.FIM+FAM在评估创伤性脑损伤日间项目结果中的效用。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):267-77. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000290971.56130.c8.
4
Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the Functional Independence Measure for patients with stroke.针对中风患者的波斯语版功能独立性测量量表的跨文化验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(3):289-98. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1036173. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
5
The Development of Two New Computer Adaptive Tests To Evaluate Feelings of Loss in Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: TBI-CareQOL Feelings of Loss-Self and Feelings of Loss-Person With Traumatic Brain Injury.开发两个新的计算机自适应测试来评估创伤性脑损伤患者照顾者的失落感:TBI-CareQOL 失落感-自我和创伤性脑损伤患者的失落感-人。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;100(4S):S31-S42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.评估用于社区个体长期随访的创伤性脑损伤结局指标。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar;82(3):367-74. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.21525.
7
Conceptual Structure of Health-Related Quality of Life for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury: Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the TBI-QOL.创伤性脑损伤患者健康相关生活质量的概念结构:TBI-QOL 的验证性因子分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1):62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
Presence of a dedicated trauma center physiatrist improves functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury.配备专业的创伤中心精神科医生可改善创伤性脑损伤后的功能预后。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Jan;80(1):70-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000890.
9
Structural Validity of an ICF-Based Measure of Activity and Participation for Children in Taiwan's Disability Eligibility Determination System.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的台湾残疾资格评定系统中儿童活动和参与测量的结构效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 24;17(17):6134. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176134.
10
The Responsiveness of the Lucerne ICF-Based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale: A Comparison with the Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel Index.基于卢塞恩国际功能、残疾和健康分类的多学科观察量表的反应性:与功能独立性测量和巴氏指数的比较。
Front Neurol. 2016 Sep 26;7:152. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00152. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伊朗创伤性脑损伤的流行病学:系统评价与荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Sep;52(9):1818-1831. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i9.13565.
2
Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite cross-sectional study.《中国生育体验问卷(CEQ)的适应性研究:一项多地点横断面研究》。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0215373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215373. eCollection 2019.
3
The Feasibility of Telephone-Administered Cognitive Testing in Individuals 1 and 2 Years after Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of pediatric head trauma in guilan.吉兰省小儿头部创伤的流行病学
Arch Trauma Res. 2012 Spring;1(1):19-22. doi: 10.5812/atr.5289. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
2
Measures of injury severity and prediction of acute traumatic brain injury outcomes.创伤严重程度的评估及急性创伤性脑损伤预后的预测
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):136-42. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000026.
3
Systematic review of the risk of dementia and chronic cognitive impairment after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.
颅脑创伤住院康复后 1 至 2 年患者实施电话认知测试的可行性。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 May 15;35(10):1138-1145. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5347. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
轻度创伤性脑损伤后痴呆和慢性认知障碍风险的系统评价:国际轻度创伤性脑损伤预后合作研究的结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S245-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.036.
4
Motor rehabilitation in stroke and traumatic brain injury: stimulating and intense.脑卒中与创伤性脑损伤的运动康复:激发与强化。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2013 Dec;26(6):595-601. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000024.
5
Factor analysis of the WeeFIM in children with spastic cerebral palsy.痉挛型脑瘫儿童 WeeFIM 的因子分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Aug;35(17):1466-71. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.737082. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
6
Factors predicting functional and cognitive recovery following severe traumatic, anoxic, and cerebrovascular brain damage.预测严重创伤性、缺氧性和脑血管性脑损伤后功能和认知恢复的因素。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):131-40. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31823c0127.
7
Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤的结果指标。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011 Jul;113(6):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.013. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
8
Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists.测量重大头部损伤后的功能和生活质量结果:常用量表和清单。
Injury. 2011 Mar;42(3):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.047. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
9
Cognitive rehabilitation in traumatic brain injury.颅脑损伤的认知康复。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2010 Sep;12(5):412-23. doi: 10.1007/s11940-010-0085-6.
10
Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.功能独立性测量项目评分在从一个康复环境转移到另一个康复环境的患者中的一致性。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Dec;45(4):479-85. Epub 2009 Jul 23.