Suppr超能文献

基于社区的直接观察治疗对结核病治疗结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Impact of Community-Based DOT on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zhang HaiYang, Ehiri John, Yang Huan, Tang Shenglan, Li Ying

机构信息

College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0147744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147744. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment can lead to prolonged infectivity and poor treatment outcomes. Directly observed treatment (DOT) seeks to improve adherence to TB treatment by observing patients while they take their anti-TB medication. Although community-based DOT (CB-DOT) programs have been widely studied and promoted, their effectiveness has been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to critical appraise and summarize evidence of the effects of CB-DOT on TB treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Studies published up to the end of February 2015 were identified from three major international literature databases: Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and EMBASE. Unpublished data from the grey literature were identified through Google and Google Scholar searches.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies involving 12,839 pulmonary TB patients (PTB) in eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine cohort studies from 12 countries met the criteria for inclusion in this review and 14 studies were included in meta-analysis. Compared with clinic-based DOT, pooled results of RCTs for all PTB cases (including smear-negative or -positive, new or retreated TB cases) and smear-positive PTB cases indicated that CB-DOT promoted successful treatment [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 1.11 (1.02-1.19) for all PTB cases and 1.11 (1.02-1.19) for smear-positive PTB cases], and completed treatment [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 1.74(1.05, 2.90) for all PTB cases and 2.22(1.16, 4.23) for smear-positive PTB cases], reduced death [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 0.44 (0.26-0.72) for all PTB cases and 0.39 (0.23-0.66) for smear-positive PTB cases], and transfer out [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 0.37 (0.23-0.61) for all PTB cases and 0.42 (0.25-0.70) for smear-positive PTB cases]. Pooled results of all studies (RCTs and cohort studies) with all PTB cases demonstrated that CB-DOT promoted successful treatment [pooled RR (95%CI): 1.13 (1.03-1.24)] and curative treatment [pooled RR (95%CI): 1.24 (1.04-1.48)] compared with self-administered treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

CB-DOT did improved TB treatment outcomes according to the pooled results of included studies in this review. Studies on strategies for implementation of patient-centered and community-centered CB-DOT deserve further attention.

摘要

背景

对结核病治疗的依从性差会导致传染性延长和治疗效果不佳。直接观察治疗(DOT)旨在通过在患者服用抗结核药物时进行观察来提高对结核病治疗的依从性。尽管基于社区的DOT(CB-DOT)项目已得到广泛研究和推广,但其效果并不一致。本研究的目的是批判性评价和总结CB-DOT对结核病治疗效果的证据。

方法

从三个主要的国际文献数据库中识别截至2015年2月底发表的研究:Medline/PubMed、EBSCO和EMBASE。通过谷歌和谷歌学术搜索识别灰色文献中的未发表数据。

结果

来自12个国家的8项随机对照试验(RCT)和9项队列研究中的17项研究涉及12839例肺结核患者(PTB),符合纳入本综述的标准,14项研究纳入荟萃分析。与基于诊所的DOT相比,所有PTB病例(包括涂片阴性或阳性、新发病例或复发病例)和涂片阳性PTB病例的RCT汇总结果表明,CB-DOT促进了治疗成功[所有PTB病例的汇总RR(95%CI):1.11(1.02-1.19),涂片阳性PTB病例的汇总RR(95%CI):1.11(1.02-1.19)],并完成了治疗[所有PTB病例的汇总RR(95%CI):1.74(1.05,2.90),涂片阳性PTB病例的汇总RR(95%CI):2.22(1.16,4.23)],降低了死亡率[所有PTB病例的汇总RR(95%CI):0.44(0.26-0.72),涂片阳性PTB病例的汇总RR(95%CI):0.39(0.23-0.66)],以及转出率[所有PTB病例的汇总RR(95%CI):0.37(0.23-0.61),涂片阳性PTB病例的汇总RR(95%CI):0.42(0.25-0.70)]。所有PTB病例的所有研究(RCT和队列研究)的汇总结果表明,与自我给药治疗相比,CB-DOT促进了治疗成功[汇总RR(95%CI):1.13(1.03-1.24)]和治愈性治疗[汇总RR(95%CI):1.24(1.04-1.48)]。

结论

根据本综述纳入研究的汇总结果,CB-DOT确实改善了结核病治疗效果。关于以患者为中心和以社区为中心的CB-DOT实施策略的研究值得进一步关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7b/4744041/16dcff9b4870/pone.0147744.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验