Pickett M J
Department of Microbiology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2309-15. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2309-2315.1989.
Published reports disagree on the best features for detecting and distinguishing between Flavobacterium meningosepticum (biovar IIa) and Flavobacterium species CDC group IIb (biovar IIb; Flavobacterium indologenes). This report discloses that at least some of these disagreements may reflect the methods used. To detect production of indole, a modified Kovács reagent (not Ehrlich) and a buffered tryptophan medium were optimal, but not all strains of these two biovars produced indole. To distinguish the two biovars, hydrolysis of corn starch was preferable to that of soluble potato starch. Both biovars may hydrolyze DNA; the differentiation achieved varied with the methods used. Both biovars presented pigmented growth; only IIb, however, was obviously pigmented on a 2-day blood agar plate. Acidification of D-arabinose definitively distinguished these two biovars; several additional features were useful but not definitive.
已发表的报告对于检测和区分脑膜败血黄杆菌(生物变种IIa)和黄杆菌属CDC IIb组(生物变种IIb;产吲哚黄杆菌)的最佳特征存在分歧。本报告表明,这些分歧至少有一部分可能反映了所使用的方法。为检测吲哚的产生,改良的科瓦茨试剂(而非欧利希试剂)和缓冲色氨酸培养基是最佳选择,但这两个生物变种的并非所有菌株都能产生吲哚。为区分这两个生物变种,玉米淀粉水解优于可溶性马铃薯淀粉水解。两个生物变种都可能水解DNA;所实现的区分因所使用的方法而异。两个生物变种都呈现出色素沉着生长;然而,只有IIb在2天的血琼脂平板上有明显色素沉着。D -阿拉伯糖的酸化可明确区分这两个生物变种;还有几个其他特征也有用但不具有决定性。